Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Minnesota lawmaker drafting plan to allow importation of prescription drugs

Canada drugs
Pill photo by analuisa gamboa on Unsplash/MinnPost photo illustration by Corey Anderson

The leading Republican on the state Senate’s Health and Human Services Committee plans to introduce legislation to allow some form of importation of prescription drugs from outside the U.S. into Minnesota. 

Sen. Michelle Benson of Ham Lake has been holding town halls around the state to hear from residents struggling to afford the high cost of drug prices — and to discuss two new options recently made available by the federal government for states to address the issue. Under a proposal by the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, states could craft demonstration projects to import some drugs from Canada to control costs.

That proposal represents a reversal by the federal agency. “For the first time in HHS’s history, we are open to importation,” Secretary Alex Azar told reporters in July. “What we’re saying is we’re open. There is a pathway. We can be convinced.” It also represents a turnaround for Azar, a former drug company executive who once said importation was “just a gimmick.”

Unlike the U.S., which doesn’t regulate the price of drugs, Canada sets a price cap for brand-name drugs based on prices in other industrialized countries. Under the proposal, HHS could allow importation if doing so wouldn’t jeopardize public health and would provide significant cost reductions for patients. Though the agency has such authority for more than a decade, it has never used it.


President Trump and Republicans around the country are looking for a way to show they are responding to complaints about high drug prices. The affordability of medications — illustrated most vividly by the high price of insulin — has shown up prominently in polling about 2020 election issues.

How it would work

The federal rule hasn’t been formally proposed, and it could take several years for it to be approved. Yet Benson said she wants to have legislation ready for introduction when the Legislature convenes on Feb. 11, 2020.  

She said she currently favors what the federal agency calls “Pathway 2,” which wouldn’t import drugs directly from Canada. Instead, it would involve the state working with willing American drug makers to import their own products from Canada or other countries — or to offer their drugs domestically at the same prices they charge in foreign markets.

Benson said she has asked for a meeting with Gov. Tim Walz and has spoken briefly with House Health Care committee chair Rep. Tina Liebling about introducing a bill during the 2020 session.

Sen. Sharon Benson, right, and Sen. Paul Anderson discussing options for reduced drug pricing for Minnesotans.
MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan
Sen. Michelle Benson, right, and Sen. Paul Anderson discussing options for reduced drug pricing for Minnesotans.
“I’m gonna keep working to get language drafted,” Benson said after a town hall in Plymouth with fellow Republican Sen. Paul Anderson. “I have a growing interest in pathway 2, where we would partner directly with manufacturers.” 

She said the state might need to do a pilot project with some critical drugs that have become unaffordable for some patients.

Florida is considered a leader on the issue, having passed legislation earlier this year, though its plan calls for a pilot project that involves buying medications in bulk from Canadian wholesalers, which the feds refer to as Pathway 1. Generally, drug supplies in the U.S. are strictly tracked and monitored to assure quality and combat counterfeiting, and Florida’s plan needs to be approved by Azar before it can be implemented. 

“If we can be part of a federal waiver based on the Florida law, I would take that as a victory,” Benson said. “I would take Pathway 1 — but I also want to work on Pathway 2 in case waivers get stalled.”

Walz wants to do more

So why would drug makers want to help states buy medications at lower prices?

Benson said drug makers have grown frustrated with the current system in which drug buyers — either pharmacy benefit managers working with insurance companies or government health providers — seek heavy rebates for their purchases. 

As a result, drug makers increase prices and then effectively reduce them by paying the rebates — a system that means patients not on government health programs, or without insurance, often end up paying the highest prices, since they aren’t privy to the rebates, Benson said.

Patients then direct their anger about those prices at the drug makers. “They keep getting beat up,” she said. “So let’s try a different path to getting necessary drugs to Minnesotans. We’re trying to put downward pressure on this system.” She said her goal is to have bill language ready for review by groups interested in the issue shortly after the first of the year. 

Walz, through a spokesperson, said he was open to the idea but said he also thinks more needs to be done. He has been critical of drug makers, not only because of rapid increases in insulin prices but also for the cost of brand name and generic drugs. “Too many Minnesotans struggle to afford the skyrocketing costs of prescription drugs,” Walz said in a statement. “We should consider all options to provide Minnesotans relief, but our main focus must be to create more affordable options here in Minnesota.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, Quinn Nystrom
REUTERS/Rebecca Cook
Minnesota insulin activist Quinn Nystrom, right, shown with presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, purchasing lower priced insulin at a Windsor, Ontario, pharmacy in July.
During a June round table with diabetics and their family members, Walz had even harsher words for drug companies. “I’m not going to step in and watch people make obscene profits, shift the cost back to the taxpayers of Minnesota and then walk away with that money too,” he said. 

Cody Wiberg, the executive director of the state board of pharmacy, said he has not been involved in crafting the importation legislation, and that the board hasn’t taken a position on the issue. “I would not ask the Board to take any position until legislation is publicly available,” he said. 

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the trade organization that represents the makers of brand-name drugs, opposes the federal rule, mostly on safety concerns, and the group asked Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to veto the bill that put that state first in line to import drugs from Canada. DeSantis ended up signing the bill.


Nick McGee, director of public affairs for PhRMA, said the group’s opposition hasn’t changed since that letter was sent. “It’s not just our position. It’s the position of former FDA commissioners and law enforcement, that this type of proposal is too dangerous for patients,” McGee said. “The United States has the gold standard of drug supply chains and these proposals open up that supply chain and there’s no way to guarantee the safety of drugs that come from outside the United States.”

Even supplies that are imported from Canada aren’t guaranteed to be made there and could have passed through Canada from other countries, he said.

Canadian health officials have also criticized the plan, fearing it could cause shortages of drug supplies in that country if it becomes overwhelmed with demand from the much-larger population of the U.S. 

At the federal level, there are bills by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (S. 97) and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (S. 61), that seek to allow drug importation from Canada.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Gerald Abrahamson on 11/15/2019 - 11:22 am.

    First, the state can not do this because only the federal govt has the authority to deal with international trade, imports, etc. Second, the “import from Canada” thing has been beaten to death and won’t happen–Canada will NOT allow the US to import through Canada. If Canada gets a good price, why can’t US businesses get an even better deal by “going direct to the mfr” and *skip* the cost of a Canadian middleman? If the US buys more, then the price should be LOWER (buy more = lower price, right?). Deal direct = lower price (eliminate middlemen AND kill counterfeits).

    • Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 11/16/2019 - 09:10 am.

      Yes, Gerald is correct. Pawlenty tried to do this and it was blocked, I don’t know why anyone would expect it to work now. The problem is that the FDA has to certify drugs imported or re-imported into the US and they can’t or won’t do that for drugs being imported from Canada. The only way they can certify that the insulin you buy in Canada is the same insulin you buy in the US is to set up an inspection regime, and they won’t do that.

      I don’t know how someone can write an entire article without once mentioning the failed attempt to do this exact same thing a little more than a decade ago? This is NOT a new idea.

      Second, we need to fix this, not patch it. Making patients leave the country to obtain medication available in the US is a ridiculous “solution”. This is literally bending over backwards to accommodate price gouging in the US and while it may get some medications into the hands of those who need them for now… it’s a temporary fix at best.

Leave a Reply