Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Target snags $1.6 billion tax break for Canadian exit

In January, Target announced plans to exit Canada, closing 133 stores north of the border that employed 17,600 people.

Canada proved to be a huge disaster for Minneapolis-based retailer Target Corp.

Twin Cities BusinessIn January, the company announced plans to exit Canada, closing 133 stores north of the border that employed 17,600 people. In its announcement of the company’s fourth quarter and year-end results, Target pegged the losses for the Canadian exit at $5.1 billion.

The silver lining? The company’s annual filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission indicates that the company will get a tax break as a result of the losses in Canada.

According to the filing: “We have recognized a tax benefit of $1.6 billion in discontinued operations, which primarily relates to the loss on our investment in Canada and includes other tax benefits resulting from certain asset write-offs and liabilities paid or accrued to facilitate the liquidation. We have realized the majority of these tax benefits in the first quarter of 2015 and expect to realize substantially all of the remainder in 2015.”

In general terms, tax benefits can ultimately boost a company’s bottom line by offsetting losses when calculating a company’s net income.

Target’s annual 10-K report was filed with the SEC on Friday. A Target spokeswoman could not be immediately reached for comment on the filing.

The annual filing also reported that the data breach that hit the company has cost $252 million so far.

Those expenses will be partly offset by insurance proceeds. According to Target’s filing: “As of January 31, 2015, we have incurred $252 million of cumulative data breach-related expenses, partially offset by $90 million of expected insurance recoveries, for net cumulative expenses of $162 million.”

The newly disclosed total for data breach costs combines Target’s data breach expenses for the company’s fiscal 2013 ($61 million) and fiscal 2014 ($191 million), numbers that the company has previously reported separately.

The data breach, which came to light in December 2013, comprised the data of an estimated 70 million Target customers and was a key factor in the May 2014 resignation of previous CEO Gregg Steinhafel. New CEO Brian Cornell took the helm in August.

For fiscal 2014, Target reported a loss of $1.6 billion on revenue of $72.6 billion. The company’s overall numbers were dragged down by Canada.

During fiscal 2014, Target opened 16 new U.S. stores, but closed 19 locations. At the end of January, the company had 1,790 stores, three fewer than a year ago. Target has 75 stores in Minnesota comprising 10.7 million square feet of retail space.

In early March, Cornell outlined plans to overhaul the company. The company’s statement noted: “Target’s store opening plans will increasingly focus on new, more flexible formats like TargetExpress and CityTarget, which cater to guests in rapidly-growing, dense urban areas. Throughout 2015, the retailer will open eight TargetExpress locations across the country. In addition, the company will continue to open the right stores to fit each community and test new layouts in its general merchandise stores.”

The company’s March 3 outline of the “roadmap” to transform its business signaled significant job cuts on the horizon. That hit home on Tuesday, March 10, when the company cut about 1,700 jobs, primarily from its Twin Cities headquarters. At the same time the company announced that it would not fill 1,400 open positions.

In January, the company cut 550 local jobs for employees who supported the Canadian operations.

For the latest round of job cuts, Target filed a WARN notice with the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development on March 12. Federal law requires companies to file Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) documents to notify employees of mass layoffs. 

In an email to Twin Cities Business, DEED spokeswoman Madeline Koch indicated that Target’s filing indicated that 1,679 employees were affected.

Per the company’s letter to DEED: “This reduction is expected to be permanent.”

This article is reprinted in partnership with Twin Cities Business.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Hiram Foster on 03/23/2015 - 09:24 am.

    “Adam Smith”

    Most of what I know about taxation, I learned from a movie called “The Wheeler Dealers” which is occasionally shown on the Turner Classic Movies. James Garner plays a Texas oil guy who says what you have to know about capitalism is that when you make money you keep it, and when you lose money, you have to find a way for government to take three quarters of the loss. That’s just as true today as it was in the early 1960s when the movie was made.

  2. Submitted by Frank Phelan on 03/23/2015 - 06:26 pm.

    Infernal Revenue Service

    Is that the same tax code that is so unfriendly to business?

  3. Submitted by Michael Hess on 03/24/2015 - 12:54 am.

    less profit,less tax

    Calling it a tax break makes it sound like some kind of special treatment. Tax law is super complicated but at high level if they had a loss of $5.1 billion, reducing profits that much, the federal Tax on that profit would have been $1.7B or so.

    would you say the Target employees who were impacted in the layoffs who don’t find work right away get a ‘tax break’ because their lower income means a smaller income tax bill? I doubt it.

Leave a Reply