Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

This coverage is made possible by a grant from The Saint Paul Foundation.

Timetable set for Minneapolis City Council’s stadium vote

Minneapolis City Council

Once Gov. Mark Dayton signs the stadium bill, the Minneapolis City Council has 30 days to vote on accepting or rejecting the legislation.

How this comes out is no big mystery because there are seven stadium supporters on the 13-member Council, and they have already voted on the proposal once.

The tentative voting schedule outlined today by City Council Vice President Robert Lilligren places the stadium legislation before the Ways and Means/Budget Committee on May 21. There are three yes votes and three no votes on that committee.

A tie vote could send the stadium proposal could before the full City Council with no recommendation from the committee.

This could produce a May 24 vote of the Committee of the Whole, followed the next day by the formal City Council vote.

The City Council could also be convened by Mayor R.T. Rybak or, in his absence, the council president, for a special council meeting to consider the stadium legislation.

And just because this seems like a done deal, don’t expect City Council members on either side of the issue to miss a chance for public comment.

New city coordinator

Paul Aasen
MinnPost photo by Karen BorosPaul Aasen

Paul Aasen, Rybak’s nominee for city coordinator, was officially introduced to City Council members today during a public hearing.

Aasen, who has been Gov. Mark Dayton’s head of the Pollution Control Agency, also served in leadership positions for Govs. Jesse Ventura and Arne Carlson.

“He has managed large organizations that have legislative bodies. This will not be new to him,” said Rybak as he introduced Aasen. “He’s a person who has a professional, easy-going attitude,” the mayor added.

Aasen fielded questions about his scientific background and experience, telling council members about the “continued need to drive value out of the government service machine,” which he said is the measure of government doing its work.

Craig Johnson of the League of Minnesota Cities was among those praising Aasen, describing him as a “creative problem-solver” and someone who is “always calm.”

“It’s hard to endure that much public praise,” said Council Member Betsy Hodges, who said she is supporting Aasen’s nomination, but she offered a “cautionary note.”

“It’s possible that he thinks state government has prepared him for City Hall, that he has herded cats at the state Legislature and can herd cats here,” she said, adding, “There are fewer of us and fewer places to hide.”

The Committee of the Whole approved the appointment on a voice vote, sending it to the full City Council for a vote Friday.

Property value appeals

The number of property owners who appealed their assessed value in 2012 increased from a year ago but did not match the recent previous high set in 2009, according to City Assessor Patrick Todd, who presented the 2012 data to City Council members.

The number of appeals this year was 615, up by 65 from the 550 appeals in 2011. In 2009, there were 1,335 appeals.

Property owners can appeal the assessed value of their holdings to the city assessor.  If that does not resolve the problem, property owners can take their case to the Board of Appeal and Equalization. 

This year, 81 took their case to the board for resolution. Of those, 40 assessments were reduced, 24 were sustained and 17 were increased. 

Most of the appeals came from owners of residential property.

Underwater voters?

A small correction has been made to newly created voter precinct maps. It seems that one precinct has no known residents because it is in Lake Calhoun. Should there be any voters living in the lake, they will have to mail in their ballots. There will be no polling place for them.

Two Cities blog, which covers Minneapolis and St. Paul City Halls, is made possible in part by grants from The Saint Paul Foundation and the Carolyn Foundation.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Solly Johnson on 05/10/2012 - 06:09 pm.


    The entire stadium process has made a sham of democracy, by both city and state governments. The city council had input from residents and businesses last month, simply to say that they had received input from residents since everybody already knew how the council members would vote. At the state level rules and procedures were bent to allow the bill to move quickly, something that would not occur for any other legislation. From watching this entire process one can understand why the USA ranks 20th in the world in corruption in government, behind Canada and most of the socialist democracies of western Europe which rank as the most honest.

  2. Submitted by Jim Bernstein on 05/11/2012 - 02:41 pm.


    Not even a whiff of corruption! This was hard ball politics at its finest. Compromises all along the way, tough negotiations, even tougher votes, lots of debate, everyone playing by the rules and using them to their advantage, and all under deadline pressure. Of course some people are not happy with the result but this was the Legislature at its best! Most importantly, the result is the Vikings stay in Minnesota and a lot of folks are very happy about that.

Leave a Reply