Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

This coverage is made possible by a grant from The Saint Paul Foundation.

Minneapolis approves $392,500 settlement with former cop over invasion of privacy

A former police officer — who accused cops from across the Twin Cities of invasion of privacy when they inappropriately accessed her driver’s license information — will receive $392,500 from Minneapolis.

Anne Marie Rasmusson, a one-time St. Paul and Eden Prairie police officer, has alleged that 140 officers accessed her Department of Motor Vehicles file 554 times between 2005 and 2012 without an official reason.

The DVM file includes photographs, addresses, physical descriptions and her driving record.

The Minneapolis City Council approved the settlement on a voice vote after nearly an hour behind closed doors discussing the matter with the city attorney and members of her staff.  Closed-door meetings to discuss legal matters are allowed under Minnesota’s open meeting laws.

“We knew there was quite a range of potential risk in this case,” said City Attorney Susan Segal after the vote.  She said the decision to settle was not an admission of liability in the case.

“Anytime we look at settling lawsuits we have to weigh the cost of going forward,” said Segal, who said that figure could include the cost of staff and  police time and the possibility of having to pay attorneys’ fees for the complainant. “This means we have agreed to resolve the case.”

The Minneapolis settlement brings Rasmusson’s total awards to $1,057,500, including $385,000 from St. Paul with another $280,000 from other smaller communities.

Rasmusson’s settlement will be paid by Minneapolis from a reserve fund established for legal settlements.  Segal said that use of that fund has been fairly low this year.

“We don’t roll over easily in cases,” said Segal, adding that two-thirds of the cases brought against the city go to trial where Minneapolis has a winning record.

Council wants Orchestra settlement

A resolution urging the Minnesota Orchestra and its locked-out musicians to get back to the negotiating table was unanimously approved by council members.

“There is absolutely no excuse to not have negotiations now,” said Mayor R.T. Rybak, who asked both sides in the dispute to “get into a room, lock yourselves in and resolve this dispute.”

The resolution mentions the support Minneapolis has given the Minnesota Orchestra in the past, including $14 million in state bonding in 2010 and another $15 million in bonding in 2012.

“To find a solution, everyone needs to come to the table,” said Council Member Betsy Hodges, adding, “I discourage lockouts as a solution.”

The musicians have been locked out by the Minnesota Orchestra since Oct. 1, an action that has caused the first six weeks of the season to be canceled.

The Orchestra is expected to post a $6 million deficit for the fiscal year that  ended Aug. 31.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Mac Riddel on 11/02/2012 - 09:22 pm.

    A MILLION dollars for having her pictures viewed??

    Seriously, this is crazy. She gets a million bucks by losing some weight and having a picture of her viewed by her coworkers. Yes, it was probably inappropriate for others to view that picture. But forcing cities to pay tax-payer money totaling over a million dollars to her? How on Earth did she earn a fraction of that? Did she suffer that greatly? I’m sure she’s laughing all the way to the bank after this debacle.

    As a taxpayer, I wish I could sue her to get my money back. At least voters can vote the city council members who agreed on the amounts out on Tuesday.

    • Submitted by Harris Goldstein on 11/03/2012 - 10:38 am.

      Sue who?

      Yes, too much money given the circumstances. But rather than sue her to get the money back, I’d like to sue those who improperly used their access to pay the judgement.

  2. Submitted by Jeannie O on 11/05/2012 - 12:04 pm.

    It’s too bad . . .

    I wish it didn’t have to be the way of awarding this person so much money. But it seems to be the only way this sort of thing gains recognition. If the awards were not awarded, this would have been a non-story and there would be no one complaining.

    It is time to hold people accountable. Why weren’t these people fired? Why did so many of them freely participate? Were their supervisors part of the problem? Maybe even higher up? Hold these people accountable and you won’t have to worry about big settlements.

Leave a Reply