Minneapolis delegates arriving Saturday morning wore their mayoral choice on their chest.
Campaign T-shirts were the uniform of the day when the first order of business was glad-handing in the lobby outside of the auditorium. After that, DFLers spent the next 12 hours fighting about which candidate to endorse.
As the day wore on, it became obvious that for most delegates, their first choice was their only choice.
When a candidate was dropped from consideration, very few delegates switched their support to someone else. Their second choice was pretty much “go home.”
That view didn’t please the state DFL Party’s top official.
DFL’s Martin pushes for endorsement
“It would be a shame if we left here with no endorsement,” DFL Chair Ken Martin told delegates just after the first ballot of the day. “We do not want to sit on the sidelines in this race for mayor.”
In the end, they all went home without an endorsement, ensuring that all six DFL candidates would be in the race all the way to November —and likely prompting others to join Independent candidate Cam Winton in running.
Two candidates — Mark Andrew and Betsy Hodges — battled throughout the day, with Andrew leading on every ballot but never nearing 60 percent.
Three already had said they would continue running even if the DFL had endorsed a candidate.
Those three — Jackie Cherryhomes, Don Samuels and Jim Thomas — were eliminated on the first ballot when each of them failed to secure at least 10 percent of the vote.
Andrew and Gary Schiff had said before the convention that they would not run against an endorsed candidate, and Hodges had said she was keeping her options open. But in a morning question-and-answer session, Hodges said she would not challenge an endorsed candidate.
Central Committee endorsement?
Delegates also were concerned about the possibility that the Minneapolis DFL Central Committee could make an endorsement if the convention didn’t. Despite that possibility, Minneapolis DFL Chair Dan McConnell said endorsement by the Central Committee was “very unlikely.”
Then came the balloting.
On the first ballot, Andrew led with 497 votes, or 35.8 percent, with Hodges at 360 votes (25.9 percent) and Schiff had 326 votes (23.5 percent). There were also 15 votes, or 1.1 percent, cast for no endorsement.
Endorsement would have required 834 votes, 60 percent of the 1,389 votes cast.
The convention rules required five ballots before a motion to adjourn without endorsement or a vote to have no endorsement could be advanced.
The three candidates who were dropped after the first ballot received a total of 182 votes, or 13.1 percent, of the vote — but those votes didn’t all show up in Round 2. On the second ballot, only 1,280 cast ballots, down 109 from the first ballot.
No one came close on the second ballot, but two of the remaining three gained support.
Andrew gained 37 votes, up 5.9 percentage points to 41.7 percent. Hodges gained 43 votes, up 5.6 points to 31.5 percent. “No Endorsement” also picked up 6 votes, totaling 21.
Schiff finished third, down 4 from the first ballot.
This is where it started to get interesting. Schiff approached a floor microphone and asked to address the delegates. To do that, two-thirds of the delegates had to vote in favor of suspending the rules. A voice vote to suspend the rules wasn’t clear, so a hand-count determined the motion had failed.
There were rumors that Schiff had planned to ask his supporters to back Hodges, a move that could have given her the potential for 725 votes, or 56.7 percent, going into the third ballot.
Instead, Schiff announced from the floor that he was withdrawing from the next ballot and received a standing ovation from the delegates.
Dwindling numbers
There was also growing concern about the number of people who were leaving. If the Andrew delegates left, Hodges could have enough votes for endorsement and the required quorum of 729. The Andrew delegates were not leaving.
There was also speculation that the Schiff delegates wouldn’t move to Hodges, regardless of who asked them and despite the two candidates shared views on progressive politics.
Out in the lobby, Schiff stood on a chair and told everyone he was not dropping out of the race for mayor or suspending his campaign.
“There is a long time to go until November,” said Schiff, who said his second choice for mayor would be Hodges.
“Let’s go get an endorsement,” said Hodges as they headed back to the convention hall to cast the third ballot of the day.
Meanwhile, the Minneapolis firefighters were handing out bright orange fliers, saying they had moved their support from Schiff to Andrew. And they were not happy.
“We had a meeting. Gary was dropping out of this race because he knew he wasn’t getting the 30 percent [needed to stay on the endorsement ballot],” said Fire Fighters Local 82 President Mark Lakosky. “Mark Andrew was our second choice.”
Ten hours into the convention, delegates cast their third ballots: 1,219 voting, down only 61 from the second ballot. Hodges picked up 214 votes and Andrew gained 62.
On the third ballot, Andrew had 596, shy of endorsement by 136, and Hodges has 574, short of endorsement by 158 votes. No endorsement rose to 49 votes.
Rumors abound
At this point, rumors circulated that the Hodges people were not happy with the way third round ballots were counted.
Convention Chair Rick Stafford, who has chaired more DFL conventions than even he can remember, was becoming annoyed.
“Where I get angry is when the campaigns make charges that have no basis in fact or evidence,” Stafford told delegates.
Meanwhile, the Hodges supporters were assembling just outside of the Convention Center on the sidewalk. There were a few Schiff delegates still hanging around but not many. Most of the Andrew supporters remained in the auditorium awaiting the fourth-ballot results.
MinnPost photo by Terry GydesenCandidate Betsy Hodges on the sidewalk outside the convention center telling her supporters to go home.
The convention was nearing its 12th hour when the results were announced: 1,092 ballots cast with 656 needed for endorsement. That total was down 127 ballots from the previous vote and down 297 from the first ballot.
No Endorsement picked up some steam, going from 49 to 61 votes. Andrew, meanwhile, dropped 54 votes to 542, and Hodges dropped 90 to 484.
Time to move on to the fifth ballot and after that the option of voting for no endorsement.
But the Hodges people were gone. And so were some of the Andrew people. And so perhaps was the 729-member quorum required to do business.
They voted anyway, even with a doubtful quorum. (The vote was counted, but totals were not released because it turned out there was no quorum.)
They also knew if they stayed in the Convention Center past midnight, it would cost the party another $20,000.
“There were some, I think, questionable back-room tricks going on,” said Andrew in an interview on an empty convention floor.
“I’m going to move forward as the leading candidate. We had a majority of the votes,” said Andrew. “We were ahead on every ballot of the day.”
And so begins the next phase of the campaign.
Possible small correction
Great article. One possible correction. I don’t believe this line is accurate: “Schiff finished third, down 4 from the first ballot and was required by convention rules to drop from the race.”
As I understood things, the cutoff for dropping candidates was 20% in that round, so Schiff could have stayed in for another ballot but chose to drop rather than drag things out. That made his request to address the floor different from the previous request from Thomas, who had already been mathematically eliminated.
I just have to say…
I don’t know why old media reporters are so enamored with procedure, especially political procedure. This is the second article on the failure to endorse a candidate within 24 hours on Minnpost and all it offers is more procedural detail than the first. Do you NOT know how incredibly un-interesting and un-informative this is?
It would be nice if someone discussed the differences between the candidates that inspired such loyalty in the first place. Why were people so reluctant to change their votes? Did they not trust anyone other than their candidate and if so why? Vote totals tell us nothing.
Look, there are what? 700,000 people in MPLS? Only 1,600 of them showed up here, if the rest of us were THAT interested in the endoresment procedures we would have been there don’t ya think? Who are you writing for?
Numbers
It’s more like 485,000 but who’s counting.
what are the political differences?
What are the political differences between Andrews and Hodges?
The biggest one…
…Andrew supported welfare for Wilf, Hodges was against it. That’s why I’m for Hodges, by the way.
A minor but perhaps significant point: Gary Shiff was not required to withdraw (i.e., to be dropped automatically from the ballot) after the second ballot. Only those who on the third ballot failed to get 30% were to be dropped–repeat: after the third. That’s why he asked for permission from the body to withdraw voluntarily, one ballot early (after the second, and foreseeing the third).
Ask yourself: why would the Andrew people NOT want Gary Schiff to withdraw after the second ballot? They obviously cared enough about not letting him do that to be shown up as rude. They stood to benefit in a third ballot with both Hodges and Schiff still in , and neither of them getting the required 30% to stay in contention–which would have meant a kind of endorsement by default, then, for Andrew.
It’s lovely to watch the DFL do its convention power struggles! Machiavelli lives there. Great show, city DFL!
We’ve fixed the error you cited regarding Mr. Schiff’s status
Thanks, Ed and Connie, for spotting the error.
Don Effenberger, News Editor
Nice Summary
It is rare to such a good account of a complex process.
Down with Mark Andrew
I hope this is the end of the Andrew campaign. He’s so bad he would make me miss Rybak.
Leslie Davis
If People Won’t Switch, Preference Voting Doomed
If the convention tells us that people have one candidate that they like and won’t switch, what does that tell us about how “Preference Order Voting” is Going to Work in November?
I’ll tell you — it could fail to deliver a majority victor. If a very high percentage of people still vote for just one candidate, then a very high percentage of “exhausted” ballots will exist by the time the voting is rolled up to the final two. And, the one with the higher number may NOT be a majority of all votes cast — because so many ballots were exhausted.
And, if there are 10 or 12 candidates, it may take days or weeks (and possibly another election) to determine the final result of the Preference Vote.
But, there is a happy side. A failed election will mean that the people of Minneapolis will finally figure out that they were sold a bill of goods on that new method of voting. (Voting for breakfast juice is not at all like voting for people! Gee, who woulda thunk it?)