Every so often now during COVID-19, I think of the movie “Awakenings.” Based on the memoir by Oliver Sacks, it starred Robin Williams as a doctor treating people living with permanent brain injuries. Thanks to an experimental medication, one of his long-comatose patients (played by Robert De Niro) briefly “wakes up” and leads a normal life. The heartbreaking ending arrives when the drug proves to be only temporary relief. The patients return to their previous debilitated states, and there’s nothing Robin Williams can do about it.
In many ways, the federal reaction to the COVID pandemic resembles that plot. For a brief moment in time, funding materialized that cured long-intractable problems like reducing child poverty, funding unemployment at a dignified level and functionally ending homelessness in cities like St. Paul. For the past year, anyone who needed a bed and a roof over their head could get one in Ramsey County.
That’s no longer true. The money has run out, and policymakers and shelter providers are facing the grim prospect of going back to the less humane way that our society treated people before COVID. “We’re moving from SRO (single-room occupancy) back to congregate care, which is not ideal for individuals, but that’s where we’re at,” explained Ramsey County Commissioner Trista MatasCastillo, who represents some of the cities’ least wealthy neighborhoods.
The federal money allowed Ramsey County, like many local governments, to sign temporary leases for SRO shelters — making a huge difference for folks who had been out on the street. “Honestly, the expansion for family shelter system was one of the biggest silver linings of the pandemic,” explained Sarah Liegl, the director of the St. Paul’s Project Home. “The influx of money taught us there’s a much better way. It’s amazing. Families can come in and have their own room and lock their door, and we’ve seen a huge increase in the number of families finding housing.”
Liegl’s Project Home is a decades-old interdenominational effort providing stability for unsheltered families with kids, usually in the local school system. It relies on religious institutions to provide space and volunteers to staff temporary shelters for a few weeks at at time. For example, I’ve volunteered a few times to help staff an overnight temporary shelter at St. John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in St. Paul’s Cathedral Hill. Kids and moms ate and watching TV in the large church kitchen and slept in cots set up in the gym, before heading off to school or other day shelters in the morning.
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Bill Lindeke[/image_credit][image_caption]The listening house shelter on West 7th street in St. Paul, which is to be closed.[/image_caption]
Without help, it leaves a bleak outlook for shelters focused on individuals, like the former Bethesda Hospital site in the Capitol Heights neighborhood. “The 100 men that were at Bethesda are no longer there,” said MatasCastillo, referring to the county’s temporary shelter. “Some were able to find housing, some moved to other shelters, and some went to live with family or double up.”
Bethesda was just one of the temporary hotels and buildings run by the county during COVID. Most of them are gone today, but their success left an impression on policymakers. “The big takeaway is that we need to to stabilize folks who are experiencing homelessness in a space that’s there 24 hours a day,” explained MatasCastillo. “The previous model that, unfortunately, we have to go back to was a lottery system: You get in line, get a ticket, hope to get a bed, and are waiting around all day to figure out where you’re going to sleep at night, only to get up early in the morning and do it all over again. You’re kind of stuck.”
It’s not surprising that spending more money “upstream” can improve outcomes. This kind of “housing first” approach is common in many countries, most notably Finland, where policymakers and politicians have learned that spending money upfront is a great investment. Not only is it the moral thing to do, it also saves tax dollars down the road because it avoids expensive social service costs.
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Bill Lindeke[/image_credit][image_caption]Without help, it leaves a bleak outlook for shelters focused on individuals, like the former Bethesda Hospital site in the Capitol Heights neighborhood.[/image_caption]
The ending of “Awakenings“ is gutting, as patients gradually return to their catatonic states. Their human capacities and personalities fade away, and they return to unresponsive comas.
In this case, though, nobody’s waiting for a miracle of science to solve a problem. The U.S. government just proved that it can fix long-standing social ills, and the hope is that a large state surplus can keep the county’s unsheltered families in their stable homes. “To have this big of a surplus, it seems pretty ridiculous to not be able to house families who need us,” said Liegl. “I hope they do the right thing and everything moves forward. I would hate to go backward to a system that does not work the best for the families.”
So what is this better way you speak of? Build county-run motels on the bus lines? Seems doable if you can design a building to be easily supervised and maintained.
It’s pretty clear that smaller, distributed SRO buildings should be part of our housing mix. I’d go so far as to say that much of the homelessness we see occurs because we outlawed SROs.
“The U.S. government just proved that it can fix long-standing social ills, and the hope is that a large state surplus can keep the county’s unsheltered families in their stable homes.”
The problem is, we printed at least 10 trillion dollars to float the economy particularly the big banks, of which made-up money the CARES Act was a part, and now everybody is suffering the pain of inflation because of it. I just paid $90 for a bag of groceries, as example. That is not sustainable.
The surplus too, is a projection, which could evaporate should the economy take a nosedive, which it already appears to be doing.
As I drove along Shepard Road the other day and saw the homeless encampments, the solution soon came into view. Several empty river barges reminded me of the time I spent in the shipyards in Bremerton, Washington. While our boat was having its reactor refueled and other refurbishments were carried out, the crew lived in barges moored alongside the pier. The shipyard had converted two large barges into comfortable living quarters that housed and slept over 100 men. What would it cost to buy and convert one or more of the river barges tied up at the downtown pier? Even if it was a million dollars, it would be cheaper than paying tens of millions of dollars for hotel rooms.
If the accommodations are good enough for members of the U.S. Submarine Service, they’re certainly good enough for this collection of homeless people. It’s not the Hilton Hotel but it’s not a tent in the park either.
Similarly, Ventura’s idea to refurb old barracks at Ft Snelling wasn’t all bad.
Not a bad idea, but you would have to check with the owners of the barges first (empty can mean they’re just waiting for a cargo).
How would it work in the winter?
A pie chart of homelessness would be useful. How big is the slice of folks who have these 2 issues: a lack of resources to afford housing and a need / desire to live their lives on their own terms with regard to drug use and other laws / regulations. Not mentioned here, yet often cited as a primary driver of the camps we saw on Hiawatha and in Powderhorn Park.
It is and was quite embarrassing to see how easy and inexpensive it actually was to drop our poverty rates and homeless numbers so dramatically. After decades of treating this like an intractable problem beyond relief we demonstrated just how resolvable it really is… and now we’re returning to station. Shame.
How cheaply can you build a 4-plex of 500 sqft apartments, independent of the cost of land? I think it can be built for $100/sqft with modular techniques or manufactured panels.
What do you think?