Indigenous leaders and activists participating in a prayer at the Mississippi headwaters in Solway on June 7.
Indigenous leaders and activists participating in a prayer at the Mississippi headwaters in Solway on June 7. Credit: REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi

As a mother, I know that my purpose is to protect and nurture the lives I birthed. Every day I try to protect my kids from the dangers in this world. I buckle them into car seats. I put on their bike helmets. I hold their hands when we are in crowds. I place them in the care of only trusted adults.

I also desire to protect them from the scarier things that keep me up at night, like what kind of a future they will inherit as an environmental catastrophe unfolds around us. In this moment, these worries are focused on the human-induced harm being imposed by the construction of Line 3 in Minnesota. This pipeline being built by the Canadian multinational Enbridge will soon carry 760,000 barrels of tar sand oil per day from Alberta, Canada, to Superior, Wisconsin.

​​On July 20, I gathered with dozens of others at the headwaters of the Mississippi and witnessed historic levels of drought, which threaten ways of life for all of us, but most immediately for the Anishinaabe people who have harvested wild rice (manoomin) in the region for centuries. I observed the impact of the Minnesota DNR’s decision to permit the Enbridge corporation to pull 5 billion gallons of water from the water table for the construction of Line 3. Amidst the haze in the air from the wildfires, I felt profound grief for the disregard of life I was witnessing. From our ecosystems to the assault of Indigenous rights and their means of maintenance, which carries horrid echoes of the historic and ongoing colonial assaults committed against Indigenous people always in the hunt for economic profit, I felt the acuteness of the crisis in which we find ourselves more sharply than ever.

And as I stood there, I could also sense the interconnections between the water that gives life to the wetlands of northern Minnesota and my – and many others’ – search to not only protect, but nurture our children and other forms of life so that hope and love can flourish in their lives. The question, which emerged then is: What does it mean to nurture and protect now in this urgent moment?

Indigenous leaders, environmental activists, scientists and concerned members of the public have had foresight that this exigency was coming. For over more than seven years, they attended all the hearings, provided the testimonies, conducted the studies, created the documentaries, wrote the songs, created the art, and cooked the gathering meals to stop the construction of the Line 3 pipeline. These wise people of conscience resisting Line 3 have the ancestral wisdom to understand inherently that protection of all life is what is just, right and necessary.

And yet, Minnesota agencies permitted Line 3 and construction began late last year, illuminating that the profit of corporate elites is valued over natural life. That wealth is also valued over the lives and livelihoods of Indigenous people whose stolen land is being drilled through as well as other marginalized groups who are disproportionately affected by climate chaos.

Amy C. Finnegan
[image_caption]Amy C. Finnegan[/image_caption]
As I stood on July 20 at the end of the easement on Great River Road in Clearwater County at the first Line 3 crossing on the Mississippi River, a muddy sludge mixed with unknown chemicals (the composition is a secret but it is known to contaminate the environment and have negative health effects) used in the pipeline drilling process seeped to the surface of the fragile wetlands. It is the ninth location on the pipeline route — that we know of — that such a frac out has occurred. The water protectors saw how workers scrambled. They observed, took footage of the spill, collected samples, prayed, held space and made calls to state officials and regulatory agencies. Based on my own unpleasant encounters with pipeline workers and the overall lack of regulatory oversight on Line 3, I fear that if the water protectors had not been nearby at the time of the spill, many of us would likely still not know of the dangerous accident that had taken place.

Unlike the water protectors who are sleeping at Camp Firelight in Clearwater County, I can’t see or hear the searing sounds of the pipeline drill every day, 24 hours a day, though it is haunting me. It is easier to put it out of sight, out of mind, as I tuck my children into bed back in the Twin Cities. But as a mother, I teach my kids to tell the truth, to respect others and our earth, to repair harm, and to speak up when something is not right. I know that I also must practice what I teach.

Thanks to Indigenous leaders like Gaagigeyaashiik (Dawn Goodwin) and Winona LaDuke, among others, I have learned that our responsibilities to nurture and protect life lie way beyond the human bodies to which we are closest.  All lives, including the plants, the trees, the microbes, the insects, the animals, the water, and entire ecosystems all deserve our love and protection. In the midst of the hazy air, the drought, and the heat, the urgency of our climate crisis could not be more poignant. What can protection mean for us today? At the bare minimum, it must call us to stand together in solidarity to stop Line 3.

Amy C. Finnegan organizes with EqualHealth and is an associate professor in justice and peace studies at the University of St. Thomas.

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see our Submission Guidelines.)

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. Life has inherent dangers like transporting oil by rail/road. The 18 wheelers spew pollution into the air while transporting oil, there are accidents that cause huge spills, it is also slower and costs more. Same for rail… People, the oil is still being transported, just by slower, more dangerous, more costly means.

  2. Get over it already. This has been through the regulatory agencies and the courts. The line is 2/3 built. You should be happy they are replacing an old pipeline with a new one. Everything you are doing is a complete waste of time.

  3. I know you’re not an insurance actuary or a risk assessment professional, but as a lay person, what do you think is more likely to occur: a leak from a brand new underground pipeline or a train derailment along the several-hundred-mile rail line?

  4. If the issue is whether to transport oil via a new pipeline, or by the old pipeline, or truck or rail, the answer is obviously, the new pipeline. If the question is why are we building infrastructure (a new larger pipeline) to transport tar sand oil when we have a climate crisis, the answer is not so easy.

    Unless there is some last minute success with the various appeals and lawsuits, it looks like the pipeline will be completed. Some have benefited from being employed on the construction of the pipeline and some have benefited from the spending by those workers and Enbridge. I am sure the billboard and newspaper industry have also been glad of the extra revenues.

    If I was an investor in the pipeline, I would be nervous. As has been pointed out many times, tar sand oil will be more expensive to move and process than is regular oil. Even if there are precautions, there will be spills and accidents which cost money to rectify. If the switch to alternative energy reaches a tipping point as predicted, how marketable is expensive tar sand oil going to be?

    This article points out some of the long term impacts on our environment especially for Native Americans, and others living along the pipeline route. But the continued dependence on and use of oil, will affect us all in a very negative way. These seem like valid concerns.

    The reassurance that this project has gone through reviews and the permitting process is not always comforting. This same argument has been used to justify many projects that have had very bad outcomes. My daughters live in New Orleans and it is not hard to find examples of projects built by the petroleum industry have been huge disasters – polluted air and water, and severely damaged health of those living next to them. One area is known widely as cancer alley. Guess who lives there, not the well off.

    Line 3 may be completed and used. In my opinion, that won’t be something to be proud of.

      1. Nope, the old pipeline is a hazard. I guess my preference is no pipeline, but it doesn’t look like that is going to happen. What I was trying to say (as others have), the new pipeline once completed is going to be a poor use of investment capital, and prolong the shift to cleaner fuels.

        1. “the new pipeline once completed is going to be a poor use of investment capital, and prolong the shift to cleaner fuels.”

          Enbridge is an energy delivery company. Good, bad or indifferent that is the lot in life they have chosen. It is their investment capital and it is going to some pipeline somewhere because that is what they do. Not unlike telling Ford car lines are a poor use of their investment capital, maybe true, but it is what they do. And I join you in wishing them a poor return on investment on there very safe, overbuilt, new pipeline.

  5. Sorry, about 60 days from completion. Face it, were stuck with a reliable new pipeline instead of the old leaky one that could be patched forever: leak/spill/patch/clean up. Rinse and repeat. Oh, you say just pull the old one up and be done with them all? You must have stock in oil trains.

    Anyone who really cares about the environment should direct their efforts at the ends of the pipeline, not the middle.
    As it is, most major players have pulled out of tar sands development. It is on life support from the Canadian government and local providers: go after them.

    And make the pipeline a very safe and little used means to get the somewhat better Bakken oil to consumers who need it less and less because of more affordable clean energy alternatives. Accelerate that process and the pipeline goes out of business: WIN!!!

    It has become more about the glory of the protest than protecting the environment: never better represented than by the above article.

    1. Well said. And many here have said that there is no need for the new pipeline which means on the day it opens, no oil will come out. Win-win!

      1. Other than the flowing white robes the picture with the article is right out of the Coen brothers : “Oh Brother Where Art Thou?”

        Life imitates art…

  6. A. The pipeline is within a few weeks of being done
    B. The tribes are divided as some support it, some oppose, mainly based on revenue from using their land.
    C. This is a big fundraiser for the anti line 3 groups, so they continue to beat this drum.
    D. This is MUCH less dangerous than train or truck for the public.
    E. This does promote the burning of fossil fuel, which needs to be reduced, but endangering the public with an out of date and poor State of repair pipeline is not good policy or sense.

    Focus on the consumption side- demand more use of renewables, reduce waste and conserve electricity consumption to reduce greenhouse gases. And embrace the Clean Car initiatives, where we all can make the biggest impact personally.

Leave a comment