[image_credit]Photo by Taylor Wright on Unsplash[/image_credit]
As mothers, people from communities most impacted by maternal deaths, and professors who know the data and lead this research, we know all too well what is at stake for people who are pregnant and their families here in Minnesota and across the country. We have served on Minnesota’s maternal mortality review committee, reading the painful accounts of maternal death in our state, discussing ways to prevent future deaths, and holding space for the pain and suffering that can never be reversed.  Each lost mother is a person stolen from a family and a community, and someone who was loved.

In Minnesota, the maternal mortality rate for U.S. born Black people is 2.8 times higher when compared to white people who give birth. The Indigenous (American Indian/Native American) maternal mortality rate is approximately eight times higher than that for white people who give birth. This means that while just 6.4% of Minnesotans are Black, they represent 15% of maternal deaths in our state. And while Indigenous people represent 2% of those who give birth in Minnesota, 12% of all Minnesotans who died during pregnancy, childbirth or the postpartum year are Indigenous.

We see similar heartbreaking statistics for babies. Among Black and Indigenous people in Minnesota who survive pregnancy and childbirth, they still face the reality that their newborns are two times more likely than white newborns to die before they celebrate their first birthday.

This disproportionate burden of loss is staggering. Tragically, this keeps with the historical precedent set by Minnesota’s first governor, Henry Sibley, whose actions and words dehumanized Dakota people, “Oh the fiends, the devils in human shape! My heart is hardened against them beyond any touch of mercy.” (Henry Sibley, 1858) Dehumanization and racism have hurt Indigenous and Black Minnesotans for centuries.

The tragic effects continue today, as Minnesota’s Black parents are haunted by the killing of our Black children at the hands of law enforcement. Police brutality is traumatic for entire communities, harming pregnant people and families. Our research shows that here in Minneapolis, pregnant people who live in neighborhoods with disproportionate police presence are at greater risk of giving birth to babies too soon (before 37 weeks gestation), putting them at risk for a host of serious short and long-term challenges.

Minnesotans — and the entire United States — face a maternal health crisis. Nationally, maternal morbidity and mortality rates are rising. Maternal mortality rates in the United States now exceed that of any other developed country; our maternal death rates are on par with Saudi Arabia, Latvia, and Uruguay.

Katy Backes Kozhimannil
[image_caption]Katy Backes Kozhimannil[/image_caption]
Yet the shame of international comparison obscures the deeply unjust inequities in maternal mortality among historically marginalized communities. Nationally, Black, Indigenous, poor and rural people face greater risks during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum. A focus on ensuring the safety and vitality of Black and Indigenous communities is urgently needed here in Minnesota and across the country.

On Tuesday, Dec. 7, the White House announced the first ever Day of Maternal Health Action, highlighting commitments that the federal government, private sector and Congress have made to improve maternal health and reduce inequities. For example, the federal Build Back Better Act invests in mothers.  It includes a provision that would extend pregnancy-related Medicaid coverage for a year after childbirth, reducing insurance disruptions that are common among low-income postpartum people.  The Build Better Act includes provisions from the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act, which would expand and diversify the perinatal workforce, address the social determinants of health, invest in research and data collection and expand access to digital health tools.

Rachel R. Hardeman
[image_caption]Rachel R. Hardeman[/image_caption]
In Minnesota, the Dignity Pregnancy and Childbirth Act will support antiracism and anti-bias training for maternity care clinicians across the state. But more work is needed. It is essential that efforts to support racial justice here in Minnesota include investments directly in the communities most affected by poor outcomes — Black and Indigenous people — and to ensure representation by those groups in decisions. Racial justice is not possible without reproductive justice, and passing the Protect Reproductive Options Act (PRO Act), which establishes Minnesotans’ fundamental right to make their own decisions about their reproductive health care, is a necessary step to improve maternal and infant health. Pending Supreme Court decisions threaten to undermine the constitutional right to abortion, so states must act.

Maternal death disrupts the cycle of life in a way that is deep, violent, tragic and destructive; it affects us across generations. Personally, our life and work are shaped by the memory of those we have lost. We are all touched by the historical traumas our ancestors have faced.

Our legacy toward Black and Indigenous families in Minnesota does not need to be defined by the words of Henry Sibley. Minnesota’s racial inequities in maternal mortality demonstrate that historical trends persist into contemporary reality. But the time for change is now. The health and well-being of pregnant Minnesotans and their families should not be “beyond any touch of mercy.”

Katy Backes Kozhimannil, PhD, is Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, director of the University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center and Rural Health Program, and senior adviser to the Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity. Rachel R. Hardeman, PhD, MPH, is Blue Cross Endowed Professor of Health and Racial Equity and founding director of the Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and a 2021 Bush Fellow.

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. Are the authors claiming police presence in areas cause birth issues? How many children were killed by police last year (of any color) in Minnesota? Not sure I understand the correlation between a quote from 1858 and 2021 birth mortality rates.
    I assume a board of pediatric doctors have come up with guidelines for a healthy pregnancy, no matter the color of your skin. Having a healthy pregnancy should start with following basic health guidelines, regardless of skin color.

  2. “pregnant people who live in neighborhoods with disproportionate police presence” Looks like a de-fund the police program in the making, any correlation to crime and disproportional police presence, i.e more low income, more dysfunction, more crime, more police? Seems these well educated folks are choosing their solutions to support their politics.

    1. Looks like commenters have decided to use this article – and one remark in it – as a means to push their own agendas.

      Any comments on the overall issue of maternal health?

      1. Yeah, I find it difficult to believe that it is a policing problem! It also seems difficult to say it is a severe funding problem, got a county budget (Hennepin County) with near 80% of $2.4B going for Health, Operations and disparity reduction, human services and public safety. Would agree there are tough times for some folks, but it is also near impossible to get some folks to change the way they see the world, and how they interact. Did not see anything in the article about other circumstances such as, poor nutrition choices, drug and alcohol abuse, abusive relationships, etc. etc. but calling out excessive policing, that is very difficult to chew down!

      2. To be fair, this garbage article tries to tie police presence in neighborhoods to maternal health. This was never a serious discussion to begin with.

  3. ” …. as Minnesota’s Black parents are haunted by the killing of our Black children at the hands of law enforcement.” And YET … not a single word written about the killing of Black children and Black people by Black criminals who are increasing and growing bolder all the time. The killing of Black children (very arbitrary as a teen ager with a gun, or who is committing a dangerous crime, is no longer a child) by law enforcement is miniscule compared to the killing of Blacks by other Blacks. Let’s get real and speak the truth !
    I, and many others, are sick of these lies.

    1. Do you think the “and many others” strengthened your argument? Or do you think it made it appear as if you were fishing for validation of an opinion you know to racist and reprehensible, like a schoolyard bully seeking out the approval of timid “followers” in the crowd as they punch down on their latest victim of opportunity? I know which way I’D lean…

      1. I would say the outcome of the defund the police vote, where Minneapolis’s black voters were the strongest opposition provides the “many others.”

  4. What an absolutely worthless piece.

    The problem here is, as usual, poverty. The BIPOC community is poorer than the state as a whole, and poor mothers can’t afford proper healthcare, have good nutrition, avoid drugs and alcohol, etc.

    This isn’t because a governor was racist a couple centuries ago. And this:

    “Our research shows that here in Minneapolis, pregnant people who live in neighborhoods with disproportionate police presence are at greater risk of giving birth to babies too soon (before 37 weeks gestation), putting them at risk for a host of serious short and long-term challenges.”

    If this had been a high school term paper, the authors would have received an “F.” Yeah, its not the police presence. Its the poverty. Which leads to the crime and to the police presence. While the authors were busy confusing causation and correlation, the residents of these neighborhoods overwhelmingly rejected the defund the police measure. Because they are worried about actual crime and having more police.

    1. Drs. Hardeman and Kozhimannil are quoting their peer-reviewed research which compared many demographics. As an obstetrician, I’m aware of many studies that show education, income and excellent health going into a pregnancy do NOT protect women of color and indigenous women from poorer outcomes in pregnancy. We have a lot of work to do to protect and empower all mothers.

      1. First, to be clear, I read the links before my first comment and now just read them again.

        “Drs. Hardeman and Kozhimannil are quoting their peer-reviewed research which compared many demographics. ”

        No, that isn’t what is happening at all. They are making outlandish claims not supported by even their own research. This is textbook correlation/causation misuse.

        “As an obstetrician, I’m aware of many studies that show education, income and excellent health going into a pregnancy do NOT protect women of color and indigenous women from poorer outcomes in pregnancy.”

        There may well be “many studies” that support that point. I was just commenting on what is in front of me. And what is in front of me is nonsense.

Leave a comment