Coal
A clean energy future powered by coal doesn’t exist. Credit: REUTERS/Carlo Allegri

Innovation breeds resistance, and as Minnesota’s Legislature works to set our state on a new ambitious course towards 100% clean energy our neighbors in North Dakota are doing their best to muddy the waters.

The so-called “Coalition for a Secure Energy Future” has jumped into action with the start of Minnesota’s new legislative session, publishing op-eds urging Minnesotans to consider that our carbon free energy goals would be best served by expanding our definition of carbon-free to include energy sources such as … coal.

According to their op-ed signature, the Coalition for a Secure Energy Future is “a nonprofit working to ensure affordable, reliable energy for Minnesotans.” But peeling back the layers of the Coalition’s identity reveals a deep connection to the dirtiest of all fossil fuels — coal. Despite the fact a clean energy future powered by coal doesn’t exist. On their website, the coalition reveals that they are “a project of the Lignite Energy Council,” a North Dakota-based coal industry lobbying group which has bragged in the past about their successful interventions to block previous iterations of Minnesota’s 100% clean energy plans. The coalition has also received millions of dollars of funding from the North Dakota Industrial Commission, an organization staffed by the state’s governor, attorney general, and agriculture commissioner, a group of people looking out for the best interests of North Dakota, not Minnesota.

That the coalition’s backers feel the need to cloak their lobbying efforts with a thin veneer of Minnesotan authenticity — hiring a Minnesotan PR professional to sign their op-eds and serve as their “executive director,” the only employee listed on their site — says something about how much North Dakota feels their interests are impacted by Minnesota’s decisions when it comes to energy.

Making a full switch to renewables would benefit Minnesotans in nearly every way. The benefits of technologies like wind and solar go beyond climate, offering Minnesotans cleaner air and improved health, with electricity that is not only more affordable, but more reliable in a crunch: when severe winter weather in 2021 knocked out power generation across the country causing blackouts for millions, 73% of the lost generator capacity came from coal and methane plants.

Minnesota has no fossil fuel reserves or production to speak of, meaning most of the jobs created by our energy consumption don’t stay in our state and instead benefit economies of other states such as North Dakota, a trend that a home-grown renewable energy economy could begin to reverse.

It’s clear our neighbors in North Dakota are putting up a fight to stop Minnesota from charting our own energy future. In 2020 Minnesota-based Great River Energy tried to close Coal Creek Station, a failing coal power plant that had cost the electric co-op’s member-owners an estimated $170 million the year before. Officials in McLean County, North Dakota, where the station is located, responded by threatening to have the state’s attorneys nuke all renewable energy leases in the area, effectively holding hostage a high voltage power line carrying power from Coal Creek to the Twin Cities 436 miles away. In a time when transmission of electricity is perhaps the No. 1 barrier to electrifying our economy the message to Great River Energy was clear: The line would be used for coal, or for nothing.

Duane Ninneman
[image_caption]Duane Ninneman[/image_caption]
The Lignite Council’s strategy here is a proven one: buy friends, disguise your interests, misrepresent the facts, and do anything to buy a little more time for the dying coal industry. Fossil fuel interests have been using the same playbook for decades, starting when they buried the research of their own scientists by hiding evidence of climate change from the public. Once word got out about this deception they worked to delay the clean energy transition in any way possible — discrediting science, blocking alternatives, and asking us to believe in an alternate “clean coal” reality in which carbon capture isn’t prohibitively expensive and where fossil fuels have been our clean energy solution all along.

Renewable energy, not fossil fuels, is Minnesota’s path forward, benefiting our wallets and health as well as our climate. We welcome informed and honest debate about how the whole region can thrive going forward, but that does not include furtive meddling and veiled threats. This an uncomfortable truth for North Dakota’s outdated dirty energy economy, but Minnesota needs to do what is best for Minnesota—and this means passing the 100% Clean Energy bill (H.F. 7 / S.F. 4) now.

Duane Ninneman is Executive Director of CURE, a nonprofit organization based in Montevideo, MN that works to move people to action and build power within rural communities.

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

  1. Nobody really knows what ‘Clean Energy’ is anyway. The only ‘Clean Energy’ is the energy you don’t use. Coal Clean.. nope. Natural Gas Clean.. nope. Windmills clean.. nope. Solar clean.. nope. Nuclear clean.. nope.

    1. Maybe you could apply your energy insights and rate all those sources for there characteristics of clean to dirty?

      Or maybe a few words on the equivalence of solar and coal?

  2. Please define “100% clean energy “ for me. If you are talking solar, wind, hydro and geo thermal only powering major cities, that is years and years away. It will decades before the state of Minnesota can use only solar, wind, hydro and geo thermal. Don’t these “experts” and folks who run nonprofits read the news. Germany told its citizens that their commitment to “clean energy” (they tried claiming natural gas as green) would sustain them if they lost fossil fuels from Russia. They have been opening coal fired plants left and right trying to produce energy for their people this winter.
    I will once again ask the simple questions of “if 100% clean energy” is capable of running a major metropolitan area, why isn’t it? Over 80% of Minnesota’s energy is fossil fuel driven right now, why?? Is natural gas, a fossil fuel, soon to be a clean energy?
    Hopefully one day “clean energy “ (again, a definition please) will be able to supply cities and states with dependable energy. That day however is years off and this push to destroy the fossil fuel industry just makes energy more expensive for everyone.

    1. “If you are talking solar, wind, hydro and geo thermal only powering major cities, that is years and years away.”

      California (FYI: big state out West with a few big cities) regularly hits 90% of energy need being filled by renewables.

      As much as it may bitterly disappoint you, the domination of renewables is coming faster than you think. Maybe fill your garage full of coal for nostalgia?

      1. Edward, you are wrong. The 90% you are talking about came on a Saturday in April and lasted 4 seconds. The system was supported by fossil fuels and the actual percentage was impossible to gauge. The “test” did not include L.A., Sacramento and other major metropolitan areas. Headlines can be deceiving.

        1. So can bs statistics from professional conservative trolls, you sure you wanna go down THAT particular road?

          1. Bring it on!! Minnesota uses 80%+ fossil fuels and wind/solar is not viable as of now…. So yes bring on your facts and I will bring on mine.

            1. “It isn’t immediately available today” is a stupid reason to avoid planning for a different future. If it worked already we wouldn’t need to plan the transition.

  3. I suggest the new state of Wyo-dak-nebras-ida-tana.

    They would have a few thousand more voters than Tennessee…

  4. Lets see, Minnesota imports 30% of its electricity and all of its Petroleum/Natural Gas/Propane products. Minnesota would grind to a halt in 3 days without the energy exports of the Dakotas. Keep your head in the sand.

    1. Of course, prior to 2002 fracking and horizontal drilling did not exist and ND was a marginal oil player.

      And guess what! We did not grind to a halt before that and we would not today except in the rationalizing mind of a climate change denier.

    2. Yes. The Fortune 500 companies can just flip a switch and make natural gas magically appear out of thin air. The same goes for electricity and oil. Do you think at all before you put your foot in your mouth? Look a little bit how the pipelines and power lines work. They take 5-10 years to build. You can’t just snap your fingers and make energy appear. It has to come from somewhere. Maybe you can shutter the border to the dakotas too while you are at it. Close mindedness and infantile thinking hasn’t solved a single problem in the world yet.

      1. Maybe you can shutter the border to the dakotas too while you are at it.

        Now you’re just being a tease…if only…

    3. Thank you for concisely stating the problem. This is why Minnesota needs a plan to transition to other forms of energy. Wind and solar can be sourced locally, unlike fossil fuels.

Leave a comment