An attendee looking over a Sig Sauer semiautomatic rifle during the Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 2019.
An attendee looking over a Sig Sauer semiautomatic rifle during the Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 2019. Credit: REUTERS/Steve Marcus

WASHINGTON — Despite high-profile mass shootings this year and a continuing epidemic of less publicized gun violence, the issue of guns has taken a backseat to other hot-button voter concerns in this midterm election, including abortion, inflation and crime.

That doesn’t mean the gun issue is being ignored. There are hundreds of campaign ads running across the nation, mostly by Republican candidates, that stress the need to protect – and expand – gun rights.

And Iowans will vote on ballot initiative on Nov. 8 that would add gun rights to the state’s constitution. The amendment need as simple majority of vote to pass. Opponents say it would make it more difficult to win approval of new gun control measures and easier to overturn existing gun laws.

Various polls, including one by MinnPost/Embold Research, found substantial support for the expansion of gun laws.

The MinnPost/Embold Research poll asked 1,585 likely Minnesota voters last week “which of the following comes closest to your overall view of gun laws in this country?”

Fifty percent of the respondents agreed that “gun laws should be more strict than they are today.” And 19% agreed that “gun laws should be less strict than they are today.”

Support for stricter gun laws cut across gender, age, racial and geographic divisions. Even rural respondents supported strengthening gun laws, 37%, while 26% said they said the should be less strict.

The only real division was among those who identified as either Republicans or Democrats. Just 9% of those who identified as Republicans agreed with the statement that gun laws should be stricter; 50% said they agreed that “gun laws are about right” and 37% agreed that “gun laws should be less strict than they are today.”

Meanwhile, 91% of those who identified at Democrats agreed with the statement that gun laws should be made stricter.

Bryan Strawser, chairman of the board of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, said the poll’s result are based on concerns over the number of high-profile shootings this year.

“A lot of folk are aware there have been a lot of gun tragedies lately and wonder ‘what should we do about it?’” Strawser said.

But he said that once individuals become aware of what new gun restrictions would entail, their support of stricter gun laws wanes.

Strawser also said “no matter who controls the state legislature” in Minnesota after November’s election, new state gun control laws will be introduced, including a “Red Flag” bill that would allow authorities to temporarily remove weapons from those considered a danger to themselves or others.

Strawser also predicted that another bill, expanding background checks to those who buy guns at gun shows and over the internet, will also be introduced.

But if Republicans take over control of the state House, Strawser said those bill “will have no chance of passing.” His politically active organization has given Gov. Tim Walz an “F” grade and is skeptical of GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott Jensen’s commitment to gun rights.

Since the start of this year, there has been an elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Tex., a grocery store shooting in Buffalo N.Y., a 4th of July parade shooting in Highland Park, Ill. and a quiet neighborhood in Raleigh, N.C. There have also been 350 other mass shootings.

Yet fewer Democrats this year are stumping on the issue, with some notable exceptions, including Rep. Val Demings, who is trying to unseat Sen. Marco Rubio in Florida.

Democrats may be focusing less on the issue because Congress approved a modest gun bill this year that helps close the “boyfriend loophole,” barring convicted domestic abusers from purchasing a gun for five years; strengthens background checks for those under 21 and allocates funding to support crisis intervention services and states that implement Red Flag laws.

Omar v. McCarthy and vice versa

Earlier this month, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-5th, teamed up with Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. to produce a digital ad that slams House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on the hot-button issue of crime.

The progressive Democrats are trying to push back on Republican accusations that their party is soft on crime and supports the defunding of police. Meanwhile, the GOP is marketing itself as the party of law and order in these midterms, which McCarthy hopes will catapult him into the position of Speaker of the House.

The ad sponsored by Swalwell and Omar cites a 2021 report that ranks Bakersfield, Calif., a town in McCarthy’s district, No. 10 in a list of the most dangerous cities in the United States.  The ad also slams McCarthy for missing a vote on the American Rescue Plan, a bill backed by Democrats that included pandemic relief funds to local police forces. And it accuses Republicans of ignoring “certain crimes,” including the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol and former President Trump’s mishandling of classified documents.

“Everyone can see you are not pro-cop, Kevin McCarthy. You’re pro-coup,” the ad’s voiceover says.

Meanwhile, McCarthy this week reiterated a promise to kick Omar off the House Foreign Relations Committee if he wins the leadership of the U.S. House. He also said he won’t allow Swalwell to serve on the House Intelligence Committee and another California Democrat who was a prominent member of the panel who prosecuted Trump’s impeachment and serves on the Jan. 6 committee – Rep. Adam Schiff – to serve on the intelligence panel either.

Party leaders in the House determine which of their members sit on all of the chamber’s committees. Democratic leaders will have to remove some of their members from those committees if their party loses the majority in the midterm.

But Democrats took an unprecedented step last year to remove a Republican, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, from her committee assignments for endorsing conspiracy theories and promoting violence against Democratic lawmakers. They removed Greene from her committee assignments through a House vote on a resolution that was supported by 11 Republicans.

Democrats later stripped Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., from his committee assignments after he posted an anime video showing him killing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.

Meanwhile, New York Times magazine reported that Greene has warned McCarthy that he needs to give her more “power” and “leeway” to please Republican voters if the party wins control of Congress in November’s elections.

“I think that to be the best Speaker of the House and to please the base, he’s going to give me a lot of power and a lot of leeway,” Greene said. “And if he doesn’t, they’re going to be very unhappy about it. I think that’s the best way to read that.”

McCarthy said he would return both Greene and Gosar to committees if he becomes the leader of the House and that Greene and Gosar would have “better assignments.”

Poll: Latinos say inflation, cost of living top of mind

The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) released the results of a tracking poll that showed both distinctions, and similarities among the different groups of Latinos surveyed.

For the sixth consecutive week, Latino voters ranked inflation and the rising cost of living as their most important election issue, at 42%, followed by women’s reproductive and abortion rights, at 29%.

“Notably, Cuban origin voters expressed similar levels of support for protecting DACA recipients,” the poll said, a reference to young, undocumented Latinos who, as children, were brought to this country by their parents and have been given temporary protection from deportation.

Support for making DACA protections permanent was at 82% and passing legislation to guarantee access to abortion was 76% among those of Cuban origin who were polled, despite their having the highest support for Republican candidates for Congress compared to those other Latinos.

The tracking poll also said President Biden continues to have strong and steady favorability among Latino voters, at 59% and Latino voters overall continue to favor Democrats over Republicans in congressional races, by a margin of 56% to 31%.

The sixth week of polling also found Democrats continue to lead in outreach to Latino voters, but half of Latino voters (50%) have yet to be contacted by any candidate or campaign. Of the 50% who said they had been contacted, 62% indicated someone from the Democratic Party contacted them, and 40% indicated it was someone from the Republican Party.

“This week’s results shed critical light on the diversity of views among Latino voters with distinct origins. Latinos of Central American and Cuban origin demonstrate higher Republican support than other Latino origin groups, and also express higher interest in voting this November,” said Arturo Vargas, chief executive Officer of NALEO Educational Fund. “At the same time, we are seeing little progress in outreach to Latino voters — half of whom still have not been contacted by any candidate or campaign. With Latinos poised to play a decisive role in House and Senate races across the country, it is time for both parties to double down on engaging our communities.”

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

  1. Gun Laws—-enforcement of current gun laws would be nice. I am tired of seeing “felon in possession of a gun” not enforced. It should be AUTOMATIC back into prison for the remainder of their sentence or 5 year minimum. Simple Bad guys off the streets.

  2. Well with the Bruen decision I think new laws will be few and far in between. Gun control is not the answer, criminal control is the answer.

    How about enforcing the laws we have? How many times do we read the current criminal has a long list of past felonies with a firearm? The plea downs and catch and release is getting old.

    Another law is going to make you feel safer?

    1. Let’s start by passing common sense laws supported by a majority of Americans including, yes, a remarkable number of Republicans.

      1. Stop the background check loopholes for private and online sales, and for gun shows.

      2. Raise the age to buy guns to match the age to purchase cigarettes. Seems the two match up well, both lethal and both often equated with “tough guy” look.

      3. Delay purchase and possession for a week or two. That way, we might save 10-25 little kids each year when one of these mass murdering young disgruntled persons gets worked up and decides to kill teachers and students – but the delay allows for even one or two to come down from their outbid control “intend to kill” level while having to wait a week or two to get that weapon.

    2. Agreed, enforcing current laws would be helpful. However research does show restricting guns to those who shouldn’t have them(ex red flag laws) can help. Gun deaths far outnumber deaths by stabbings, etc.. and it is harder to recover from gun injuries-doctors are seeing this with more high powered firearms.
      Also stressing responsible ownership would help. Don’t leave in your car, lock it up at home.

    3. insurrection: a violent uprising against an authority or government. Sounds like Minneapolis in 2020.

      Being lax on crime will be the reason both the House and Senate turn red this election cycle.

      What good is another gun law that isn’t enforced?

      1. What good is an existing gun law that won’t be enforced because of legislative inaction/indifference/obstruction?

  3. Did the poll on gun laws ask about specific proposals or just a generic question about more or less laws. As the article pointed out, once you get into specifics support wanes. It seems the progressives, with their all or nothing attitude on so many things, get a little crazy with their proposals and end up losing support for any measure.

  4. Seems the crazy gun comments are raining again, like get the criminals, and “Dah-what the H you think the police are doing? You all talk about stronger sentencing against bad guys with guns, but then vote against every minuscule piece of gun control legislation. So the local boys in blue get 10 bad guys with guns and in the mean time 50 more guns flow into the streets for more bad guys, with fewer police and fewer ways to get at the bad guys. Yes more laws with stricter enforcement will make me feel better!

  5. Make the laws tougher, fine with me, after you make them tougher please enforce them. Current laws are not being enforced so I doubt stricter laws will be enforced. It is commonly known that legal gun owners are responsible for less than 2% of gun crimes. It is illegal gun owners who are the problem.

    1. So how do I know/identify a legal good guy gun owner from a bad guy or illegal gun owner? And how do I know when a good guy legal gun owner turns into a bad guy gun owner? You know like when they kill their wife, kids, neighbors, or husband, etc. or decide to have a field day at a local school and kill 17 or so kids a couple of teachers and blow grandma’s face away, or can legally purchase guns but then sell them to the bad guys? Its clear you are not serious.

      1. You ask them for there carry permit. If they don’t have one, they are part of the 98%,

      2. Dennis, you can tell easily the legal gun owner from the illegal gun owner, 98+% of the time a crime is committed, it is the ILLEGAL GUN OWNER who committed the crime. Unfortunately for Lefties they want to concentrate on the -2% of crime committed by legal gun owners. That is why Republicans are more trusted to stop the crime wave hurting the country.

        1. How do you tell the difference? Red hats, same T-shirts, sun glasses, you need to tell the difference before they commit the crime not after they are sent to jail! Unfortunate for all of us, we can’t just walk down the street or drive down the highway and tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys, its just that simple.

          1. Well, since nobody was shot on Jan 6th, nor was a weapon even fired. Here is a quote from a Chicago news story today: “Nine juveniles were among at least 52 people shot, 11 fatally, in Chicago gun violence so far this weekend, police said.”

            The Insurrection narrative is dead anyway. Only the hosts of the View or a few commenters here think otherwise.

          2. Dennis, if +98% of all crime comes from illegal gun owners why not throw them in jail and leave legal gun owners alone. It is easy to tell legal gun owners from illegal for law enforcement, once they’ve been arrested. Republicans want to enable cops to get the illegal gun owners off the street, the Lefties want to defund the police. No wonder why the voters want Republicans in office.

            1. Joe, why do 100% of the folks boarding airplanes have to pass through screening if only .005% of the folks boarding airplanes are a threat? Why not throw them in jail and leave the legal airplane boarders alone? It is easy to tell legal airplane boarders from illegal airplane boarders for law enforcement, once they’ve been arrested!

            2. Hmmm….

              Only 2% of guns causing trouble and 400 million guns in the USA…

              8 Million problematic guns in the USA.

              Nothing to be concerned about, right?

    1. “St. Louis school shooter Orlando Harris had 600 rounds of ammunition”
      We’ll see if he was a “legal” gun owner that we should have just left alone!

  6. Just a reminder: the various “statistics” that Joe Smith habitually throws out above are total nonsense and have been debunked many times before. No such statistics about violent crime by “legal” gun ownership are compiled; nor can they be, simply because a large portion of violent crimes are never solved. So this is just gun-rights propaganda.

    Indeed, as the NYT recently reported, the latest studies are demonstrating that the jurisdictions with the lowest levels of restrictions on gun ownership have the highest rates of violent crime. In other words, the more people owning and running around with guns (“legal” or no), the more violent crime you get.

    Just as common sense would indicate, and exactly the opposite of what the “conservative” gun enthusiasts have preached for years.

    1. Plus, more guns (legal or not) naturally means more gun deaths and injuries. Such as the Houston TX yahoo who pulled out his (unlicensed) gun to kill the person robbing him and wound up shooting and killing a 9 year old girl in a passing car. More guns, more deaths from guns.

      As Joe Smith often says, not that hard to understand!

  7. Interesting to note that almost everything that has wide spread popular support is supported by the Ds and opposed by the Rs:

    Gun safety
    Reproductive choice
    Climate action
    Pharma price negotiation
    Minimum corporate taxes

    And all of these things have been put forward in the past two years

    If the Rs gain control, the things they are running on:

    Inflation
    Crime
    Well, I guess that’s it

    Will see nothing accomplished other than trying to learn that the answer is in Hunter’s lap top

    The end is near, if not 2022 then 2024.

Leave a comment