Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Restoring cottonwoods to a healthy role in the Mississippi River floodplains

Courtesy of the National Park Service
Researcher Maria DeLaundreau is dwarfed by a
floodplain cottonwood.

When I read the other day, in a media advisory from the Mississippi River Fund, about a couple of volunteer events to plant cottonwood trees in the river corridor, I admit my first reaction was to chortle:

Really? Those blizzards of seed-bearing fluff aren’t getting the job done without human intervention?

Not everywhere, they’re not. In floodplain portions of the river’s metro reaches, the trees haven’t been reproducing for perhaps 20 years or more. Because they play some highly important ecological roles, a support program is being tested and deployed.

The problem was first quantified in a 2011 survey of floodplain vegetation by the National Park Service, which coordinates a range of environmental programming and management within the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, a nontraditional “park” unit made up of lands owned mostly by other entities in the stretch between, roughly, Dayton and Hastings.

Next Wednesday, after many months of research and preparation,  Maria DeLaundreau will lead her first team of 25 volunteers in planting more than 2,000 cottonwoods. Her project will not only address the problem along the metro portion of the river, but will also try  to determine the best way of cultivating cottonwoods in similar circumstances elsewhere.

Much remains to be learned about cultivating cottonwoods, which up to now have not seemed worth the trouble.

DeLaundreau, who finished a degree in biology and environmental studies at Wisconsin’s Lawrence University last June, is a Minnesota GreenCorps participant hosted by the Mississippi River Fund.

She knows her cottonwoods, and was kind enough to educate me in a telephone interview on Wednesday. Excerpts from her comments follow:

Cottonwoods are important in the floodplain because they do a lot of really fantastic things. There’s a certain synergy: They are the preferred nesting tree for bald eagles, they help honeybees stay healthy, they improve fish habitat, they reduce erosion both directly – with their own roots – and indirectly by facilitating the growth of other floodplain plants.

Floodplains are very harsh on plants. There’s very often full sun in areas that have been highly disturbed by flooding. There can be a lot of scouring by floodwaters, and sediment deposits. The cottonwoods come in, providing shade, and there’s one less stressor on plants in those areas.

The shade can be good for fish, too. And while the roots of all trees hold down erosion along the banks, the large roots of cottonwoods – after some of the soil is washed away from them – provide another fish habitat.

* * *

Bald eagles prefer them because of their exceptional height. Most of the trees in a forest end up topping out at about the same level. Every now and then you’ll see one that just jumps up out of the canopy – these are called super-canopy trees – and cottonwoods are in this group.

Because eagles are so big, they don’t have the ability to maneuver in a tight space, so they really like that when they come to a cottonwood tree, there’s easy access to get inside where they can build a nest.

Cottonwoods are also very strong, which is important because eagle nests get so heavy.

Yes, you could say that they get the penthouse location. The view is also pretty great, because they like scavenging  for fish, and you can’t get any closer to the river’s edge.

They’ll hunt for live fish, too, but they prefer to find fish that are already dead, or that they can take away from other animals.

* * *

When cottonwoods are forming their buds, there’s a protective of layer of resin around them. Honeybees, and other bees, will collect that resin and bring it back to their hives and just plaster the inside of the hives with it.

It works almost like a caulk, sealing up cracks, but it also has a lot of antimicrobial properties. So it kills off fungal and bacterial pathogens that might make a colony sick.

* * *

Courtesy of the National Park Service
An NPS technician measures a large cottonwood for the
2011 inventory that found no young trees.

When the National Park Service conducted its inventorying and monitoring survey in 2011, they couldn’t find any cottonwoods that had a diameter smaller than 15 centimeters.

This tells us that the cottonwoods aren’t regenerating, that young cottonwoods are not germinating and joining the forest, and haven’t been for a couple of decades, probably. It’s hard to be exact.

It’s actually hard to know how old cottonwoods are, often, because they hollow out and that makes it hard to count tree rings.

We don’t know exactly why failure to regenerate is happening. We know a lot of different factors that could be behind it:

  • Invasive species, like reed canary grass, coming into some areas and just shading out the cottonwoods when they’re really young.
  • Changes in hydrology – cottonwoods rely on periods of flooding, and then of water receding, in the right way, over a period of several years. You don’t expect to get new trees every year, but maybe only one in seven years, because you need the hydrology to be good in that year and then the next couple of years. We’re thinking maybe the lock and dam system could be having an influence.
  • Another factor could be climate change. Right now we’re looking at a couple of sites that would seem to be really good for cottonwoods to grow in, but instead of the water going down before the seeds are released, the seeds are coming down when the water’s still so high that it’s covering the soil.

This is an area of active research.

* * *

We’re trying to determine the best places for the restoration plantings – whether it’s an old field in the floodplain, or in a mature forest, or on a ridge along the river.

We have a test site at Lilydale Regional Park, in St. Paul, and another on National Park Service Island 108, which is in Minneapolis, directly below the Camp Coldwater Spring area.

We’re also still working on finding the best way to plant them by hand, for restoration: whether it’s better to plant seeds, or transplant seedlings, or use cuttings. Cottonwoods are kind of unique in that you can take a cutting from a sapling, or a twig, and put it in the ground and it will form roots and become its own tree.

Courtesy of Maria DeLaundreau
Cottonwoods, indicated in the graph above in lavender, are practically absent in small sizes in the Mississippi River floodplains.

You would think that somebody would have figured this out a hundred years ago, such an important and basic thing, but cottonwood trees are not particularly valuable economically. Species like maple, or oak, there’s been a lot more research into the best way to grow them.

Cottonwoods are only just beginning to get that attention, as we come to understand more about their functions in the floodplain.

* * *

Next Wednesday, at Lilydale,  we’re going to plant about 2,000 seeds —  I mean, exactly 2,000 seeds. I’ve been counting them, by hand. Quite the process.

We’ll also have 40 plots for livestake cuttings, a total of 200 cuttings, each about two feet long. And we’ll be planting 300 seedlings as well.

We were going to plant this Saturday, too, at Island 108, but unfortunately we just made the decision today to postpone that. The water level is too high now. We’ll be setting a new date later.

* * *

We’re very excited to be working with St. Paul’s parks and recreation department on this, too. It all got started with the National Park Service, with the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, which is a partnership park: The park service owns very little land, and most of their management is through partnerships.

As we’re doing this experiment, and determining the best way to plant, we’re really being conscious of how, if we want to replicate this, to be doing things that other city and county governments can see and do themselves.

* * *

For further reading, DeLaundreau offers links to material on bees and cottonwoods, and on livestake propagation.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by Lance Groth on 06/12/2014 - 01:16 pm.


    I like cottonwoods, unlike many I guess. Of course, I don’t like it when the fluff clogs my air conditioner, but the trees are spectacular, and provide wonderful shade. There are a couple of magnificent specimens on Summit Avenue. I’m still surprised at how many people don’t plant shade trees on the south and west sides of their house. Shade keeps the house cool and reduces the need for air conditioning – which reduces both the electric bill and one’s carbon footprint. Why would you want to let your house bake in the sun?

    It’s surprising and troubling that the cottonwoods are not regenerating. There are so many environmental effects that we are only dimly aware of. Glad they’re planting some.

  2. Submitted by Lee Wenzel on 06/12/2014 - 02:38 pm.


    “You would think that somebody would have figured this out a hundred years ago,”

    I grew up in the Red River Valley where most of the land was settled under the auspice of the Homestead Act of 1862 which provided a quarter section for living there and another quarter section of land for planting ten acres of trees. Most of these tree claims were predominantly cottonwoods. Maybe somebody did figure it out a hundred years ago and more, and we have just lost touch with the technology.

  3. Submitted by Ray Schoch on 06/12/2014 - 02:49 pm.

    It’s not automatic

    I’d pretty much have the same reaction as Mr. Meador except that, in the course of research for retracing the Oregon Trail when I was teaching American history (and was much younger), I discovered that many prairie rivers (e.g., the Platte in Nebraska), now easily identified by the Cottonwoods lining both banks, were apparently bereft of trees of any appreciable size a couple centuries ago. When Fort Kearney was built along the Platte in the late 1840s, timber along the river was scarce.

    Not the case now, of course, but most of the Cottonwoods lining the present-day Platte are descendants of trees planted (and seeds brought along inadvertently) during the emigrant migrations of the mid-19th century, including the California Gold Rush. They’re such a fixture of the current landscape that it’s hard to imagine those prairie rivers without them, but apparently that was the case – grass and sand right down to the river’s edge until the Cottonwoods were introduced by travelers. One more example of the unintended consequences of human habitation, though relatively benign in this case.

    I lived in Loveland, CO for several years in an un-air-conditioned house that had begun life as someone’s fishing cabin. In an area of the Front Range that sees 100° temperatures every summer, the fact that the house was surrounded by half a dozen mature, 50-foot Cottonwoods made a HUGE difference in comfort (not to mention electric bills). On the other hand, the leaves from those six trees were more than the city’s “lawn waste” collection could handle every fall, and I always ended up with a pile that had to, in effect, be stored over the winter and disposed of the next spring. I could use some of the leaves as compost, but I’d have needed several acres of land to use them all, and it was only a 7,000-square-foot lot.

    Cottonwoods are relatives of Poplar and Aspen, each with its own quirks, and like the other commenters, I’ll be interested in the results of this experiment.

  4. Submitted by jason myron on 06/12/2014 - 06:10 pm.


    your columns never fail to add enjoyment to my day. I sincerely look forward to reading them. Thank you!

Leave a Reply