photo of school building
At Maxfield Elementary, where a majority of students identify as Black or African American, Principal Ryan Vernosh feels compelled to take a public stance in defense of anti-racism work. Credit: MinnPost photo by Erin Hinrichs

There’s a learning curve for everyone this year, as students and educators head into a new school year taking place both online and in person, or a mixture of the two. 

Teachers are discovering cumbersome quirks of video platforms, like having to individually admit each student participant into a live video meeting while also logging attendance. Students are learning to stay socially distanced while newly reunited with their peers and teachers. And parents are bracing for any pivots to a new learning format, triggered by changing COVID-19 infection rates. 

As everyone works out the kinks in their new school formats, education leaders are asking parents and community members to show grace and compassion. At the same time, many school leaders are asking their teachers to unpack how racism and white privilege continue to shape lessons and school experiences for students of color. 

While this sort of anti-racism work has been taking shape in districts for a while now, many called for a renewed sense of urgency around it in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. Over the summer, that call to action included book clubs and reflective conversations. Now that students are back, many school leaders say they’re committed to not losing sight of this work. Here’s a look at how an elementary principal in St. Paul, a high school principal in Minneapolis,  and a superintendent in a neighboring district are advancing this work in the midst of an unconventional back-to-school experience. 

Taking a public stance

photo of ryan vernosh
[image_caption]Ryan Vernosh[/image_caption]
In advance of Labor Day weekend, the Trump administration announced a new directive: to identify and weed out all trainings for federal employees that touch on things like “white privilege” and “critical race theory” — characterizing these concepts as “divisive, un-American propaganda.”

These are the sorts of concepts that have been guiding the anti-racism efforts inside many public schools, including those led by Ryan Vernosh, principal at Maxfield Elementary School in the St. Paul Public Schools district. So he took a public stance, on Twitter, criticizing the Trump administration’s move as “white supremacy at work” and cautioned that a similar move, to end equity work at the public school level, could soon follow. 

His Tweet got picked up by a few right-wing provocateurs in the media, he says, and the pushback — ranging from threats of violence to accusations of reverse racism — began to flood his feed. “A lot of the reactions and pushback, I feel, misses the mark of what anti-racism work — like critical race theory — is. To me, that’s to analyze the systems in play that create these disproportionate outcomes for communities of color,” he said, noting the disproportionate outcomes extend beyond the education sphere to housing, health care and beyond.

As a white male, leading a school where a majority of students identify as Black or African American, he feels compelled to take a public stance in defense of anti-racism work. “Dismantling white supremacist systems — or nationalistic systems, or institutionalized racism — falls on white folks. As a leader, I need to be intentional with that work, and can’t stay silent,” he said.  

A few days later, Trump validated some of Vernosh’s initial concerns, by announcing plans to direct the Department of Education to examine the use of the New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project in schools. The project unpacks the role slavery played in shaping America. And Trump has threatened to withhold funding from schools that use it. 

Not all of Vernosh’s anti-racism efforts are playing out in such public spaces. Before the death of George Floyd, he says his team had already begun analyzing and processing several deaths within the community that were connected to gun violence in St. Paul. After Floyd’s killing at the hands of Minneapolis police, they continued to hold virtual restorative circles over the summer, to give school teachers and staff a space to process their pain, anger and frustration — the reactions they needed to sort through in order to support students who were being impacted. 

Over the summer, his staff also led a number of book studies to deepen their understanding of race and racism. Some of that reflective work will continue into this fall and beyond. For instance, his leadership team is currently examining their own racial biographies. But he’s most focused on challenging his educators to advance equity through their instructional practices — ensuring they are differentiating instruction to ensure all students are accessing the material and progressing. “That’s what, to me, true justice will be — when we can ensure that we have equitable systems and that every one of our young people are amazing readers, writers, scientists, mathematicians, critical thinkers,” he said.

Liberation through education

Driving home from a day of back-to-school prep with teachers and staff at North Community High School in the Minneapolis Public Schools district the last week of August, Principal Mauri Friestleben felt compelled to pull over so she could record her thoughts on putting anti-racism work into action this school year. Her message was straightforward: Don’t stress over convincing students that you’re an anti-racist. Show them, through your teaching. 

“Teach like you’ve never taught before. Let your revolution come through your instruction and your education,” she said in her video message on Facebook. “Teach with such an anti-racist lens that everything that you present to them — every content, every concept — is taught with such clarity, compassion, depth and conviction that they learn and learn and learn.”

Reflecting on that call to action, Friestleben says her teachers came back grieved by the Memorial Day killing of George Floyd and felt challenged by the reaction and response from the community. Coming back to prepare for the return of students, she sensed many were grasping for things she’d consider “quick fixes” — things like curriculum packets and training on how to create space for kids to process racism. 

She’s been redirecting that passion, challenging her teachers to take their convictions and desires to be an anti-racist teachers and apply it to their teaching. That means focusing on deeply understanding the state standards that they’re teaching to and deeply understanding the children that they are teaching. They need solid footing in both, in order to fully engage students in learning. 

In advance of the school year, she spent time checking in with teachers to assess their comfort level with the standards, along with the materials they planned on using. If you’re teaching a unit on persuasive writing, she says, then give the students prompts that they feel passionate about — things like law enforcement and housing and other issues impacting their lives, she said. 

“We’re all feeling very insecure and very anxious right now about the platform,” she said of starting the year in a distance learning format. “But as far as engaging in some of this anti-racism work, this isn’t new to us.” They’re already familiar with unpacking concepts of privilege and racism, through book studies and professional development opportunities. It’s the sort of reflective work that’s ongoing. 

As a school leader, she’s co-coordinating a group for local principals who are committed to advancing educational justice. It’s called Good (Trouble) Principals; and over 150 have signed on, showing their commitment to this work, no matter the pushback they may encounter. 

As far as she’s concerned, anti-racism work could be considered some of the most pro-American content you’ll ever find. “It is the story of our most Indigenous people and their strength, and their dignity, and their bravery and their compassion and their generosity. It is the story of our earliest settlers, who were also co-conspirators with abolitionists,” she said. “It’s the story of reconstruction and the African Americans that emerged as civil and political leaders, as bankers and lawyers. It is a great American story that every child, no matter what color of their skin, has an entry point into and can engage in.”

Beyond the classroom

photo of renee corneille
[image_caption]Renee Corneille[/image_caption]
Located nearby, in the St. Anthony-New Brighton School District, Superintendent Renee Corneille says she and her educators are also engaged in the sorts of book studies and reflections that are a hallmark of equity work in many schools. They’ve also been re-examining things like dress code and discipline policies and grading practices, to ensure a more equitable learning environment for all students. 

With the new school year under way, she’s asking her educators to focus their equity efforts on getting to know who their students are and building solid relationships with them, then finding ways to engage them with the content. 

“Relationships are what everything is steeped in. And we engage in our equity work by providing rigorous and relevant instruction,” she said, noting equity work in her district is grounded in research-based best practices around how children learn best, which is when they feel connected. 

When she first came to the district, to work as a middle school principal about 10 years ago, she says the community was reluctant to have deep conversations about race and privilege. Nestled into northeast Minneapolis, the district had became a white flight destination. 

When Philando Castile was fatally shot by a local police officer during a traffic stop along Larpenteur Avenue, conversations about race seemed to take off — but more so in the form of divisive echo chambers on social media. There are some who have become newly outspoken and engaged in equity work, she says. Others may still not “believe that race is a character in the story of America,” she says. And then there are people who had been steeped in anti-racism work prior — including many in the schools, where they’re charged with breaking down any systems that prevent students from learning. 

Currently, her school board is in the process of finalizing plans to facilitate conversations about race and equity with people outside of the school. They’re exploring options for bringing in trained facilitators, to help people in the community find more common ground, Corneille says. In many ways, schools are best positioned to spark these important conversations because they serve families across the community. Meanwhile, she’s using her platform, as the district leader, to set basic expectations around equity. 

“I feel like just because of COVID, there have been more opportunities required of me to communicate with my community — as well as post-George Floyd and the civil unrest that has occurred — that I’ve had to be in a space where I talk without being apologetic that we need to keep our kids safe. Sometimes that’s physical safety, as well as their emotional safety. I’ve been able to share with our community our commitment as a school district, to ensure that learning has to be for all and we can’t pick and choose who gets it and who doesn’t.”

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

  1. Math knows no race, reading knows no race, writing knows no race, problem solving knows no race. Please try teaching children the basics so after 13 years of public schools our children can have a paying career. Leave the raising and instilling principles in children to the parents, where it belongs…. Newsflash to public schools, you are not their parents, quit trying to be. Teach them the basics and let the parents instill the values they want their children to have. Stay in your lane, please.

    1. No teaching of patriotism? Or respect for law enforcement? Or the virtues of free market capitalism?

      1. RB, not sure what planet you’re on but those haven’t been taught in 25 years. Problem is they don’t do a good job with basic learning either.

        1. I’m not talking about what is done, I’m talking about what should be done. I hear frequent calls from the right to teach patriotism, and to teach why free market capitalism is God’s gift to humanity. Apparently the country started going to hell in a bucket when kids were no longer made to stand up and “plejuleejence” every morning.

          Incidentally, as I read the Minnesota Constitution, preparing students for a career is not why public schools were established.

    2. Do you really believe that all parents are teaching values and principles? I was in secondary education for 34 years and I am frustrated to the point of amazement at the lack of values and principles from absent parents. Sometimes parents cannot even take care of themselves because of absent fathers, broken homes, alcoholism, drug use, parents in the court system, etc., etc., etc. Little kids coming to school without coats on or without appropriate clothing in winter weather, kids who are not getting enough to eat at home. Kids who are bullies and have no empathy for others. It is the parents job to prepare kids to be ready to come to school …. it simply is not happening. And so …. you suggest that educators and schools not try to instill and teach principles and values? With all due respect to you … you have no idea how many absent parents there are now. And so …. it may be the schools major job … to instill values and principles. Schools have had to take over so much of what society not longer does … nutrition, fitness, health, counseling, dependability, courtesy, empathy, etc. And don’t blame schools for students failure … isn’t that the students responsibility? And parents? Do doctors have patients die prematurely because of smoking, poor nutrition, diabetes, obesity, drug use, etc. … of course they do. Is that the doctor’s fault? The same question can be asked of pastors and clergy … do all of their parishioners stop sinning? Of course not … is that the clergy’s fault? Does our court system have success with every person who goes through its system? Society provides the opportunity, but success / failure is the responsiblity of the individual.

  2. Absolutely nothing wrong with the Pledge of Allegiance, so sad that many feel it is abhorrent to value the country in which you live, oh well. Children need to be taught to read, write, do math and problem solve. You have to have a basic education to be employable. Would you hire a 19 year old that can’t read, write or do math? It is not that hard to understand. When over 50% of children who go through Mpls public schools are not proficient in the basics, you have a failing school. Again, not that hard. Teachers are not their parents, nor should they try to be. This equity/white guilt training is not the job of teachers, again not that hard to comprehend. Teach the children the basics of what they will need to succeed in America and leave the rest to the parents.

    1. “Absolutely nothing wrong with the Pledge of Allegiance, so sad that many feel it is abhorrent to value the country in which you live, oh well.”

      I could make exactly the same point about equity education.It’s about valuing the country in which we actually live, and trying to make it live up to its ideals.

      The fact that you equate it so effortlessly with “white guilt” speaks volumes right there.

  3. White privilege and white guilt are fictions of someone’s imagination. There is economic privilege but poor is poor, black or white.

    1. The late Dick Gregory had a comment about this that went something like “You try waking up tomorrow black as I am, and see what you think.”

Leave a comment