It’s been the fundamental political dilemma for those who want Minnesota to join the 19 states and the District of Columbia that have legalized marijuana for recreational uses: do they run their own candidates under their own banner or support DFLers who pledge to push legalization.
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan[/image_credit][image_caption]Michael Ford[/image_caption]
Ford was chair of one of the two legalization parties from 2015 to 2019. By winning just more than 5 percent of the vote for state auditor in 2018, he won major party rights for LMN. At the same election, Noah Johnson won 5.7 percent of the vote for attorney general and earned major party status for the aligned Grassroots – Legalize Cannabis Party (GLC).
Ford says that wasn’t the plan. Instead, the marijuana activists wanted to show the other parties that there was support for the issue and it wasn’t a political handicap.
“I organized a campaign to get candidates on the ballot for that election just so we could maintain minor party status,” Ford said. “We didn’t expect to get major party status. That was a shock. The idea was to get enough votes so legislators would see the issue, take it seriously and not be afraid to take a solid stance.”
Winning major party status had unintended results. As a minor party, organizers have control over who runs under their party name by gathering signatures on a nominating petition. Major parties do not. In 2020, anyone with a filing fee could run under one of the two legalization parties. Some did so because they believed in the issue. But some with closer ties to the GOP than either the LMN or the GLC parties ran as well, and the effect was to make close races even closer.
DFL House leadership worked to try to convince pro-legalization voters that their candidates were the best way to get achieve legalization. House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler, DFL-Golden Valley, led a statewide tour to take testimony and then pushed House File 600 through the House. It did not advance in the Senate.
[image_credit]Minnesota House DFL[/image_credit][image_caption]House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler, at podium, used the Minnesota State Fair as a backdrop for an announcement that DFL lawmakers would tour the state to get feedback that would inform a legalization bill they would be introducing in 2020.[/image_caption]
[image_caption]Former state Rep. Brad Tabke[/image_caption]
“This year we’re hoping to educate voters that voting for Legal Marijuana Now or Grassroots candidates isn’t going to get us closer to legalization. It can actually hurt us,” Ford said. “The only way we’re going to get there is either by the Republicans magically saying, ‘hey we changed our minds,’ or by electing legislators who have already taken stands.”
While LMN does have a slate of candidates, the Grassroots party is less active. One of its founders, Oliver Steinberg, is also focused on identifying spoiler candidates using the party name.
Steinberg said in May that the parties were caught off guard in 2020 but won’t be this election.
“We know what we’re facing, and potentially if they attempt again to encourage people fraudulently to pretend to be who they are not, I will proceed under the laws that we have by filing a complaint under fair campaign practices laws,” Steinberg said.
Spoiler alert
Leili Fatehi has been working on marijuana legalization for several years as a political consultant and lobbyist. She is a partner in Blunt Strategies (pun very much intended) and was a strategist behind the House DFL legalization bill in 2021. She also co-founded Minnesotans for Responsible Marijuana Regulation.
[image_caption]Leili Fatehi[/image_caption]
“That’s why it is important to do this in collaboration with leaders from that third-party movement, leaders who are recognizable to single-issue cannabis voters,” she said. The recent legalization of THC-infused edibles has provided some momentum.
“This election cycle is very exciting,” Fatehi said. “It feels like the community has really coalesced together that hasn’t existed before.”
A separate effort will be led by Maren Schroeder, the policy director for medical and recreational legalization advocates Sensible Change MN. That is the voter outreach and voter registration campaign that cannot endorse or advocate for specific candidates. Using data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Schroeder estimates how many of the 735,000 Minnesotans who say they use marijuana are in each legislative district.
Schroeder said the challenge is to convince voters who would be attracted to candidates with a legal marijuana party below their names. The coalition is offering a seal of approval for candidates who pledge to work for legalization that can be included on campaign materials and mailers.
Schroeder said the voter education part of the new coalition will try to raise money from advocates of legalization as well as those who might profit from a new market, now including retailers and producers of hemp-derived THC edibles. That could be another challenge, however.
“There’s been a lot of work on the advocacy side at little to no pay while private industry is making a boatload of money,” she said. So far, little of that has flowed into politics or issue advocacy.
[image_caption]Corey Day[/image_caption]
But Day said it was difficult to raise support from the industry – both in-state and out-of-state. The way the new coalition is positioned, however, it might not need to tap those sources of cash.
“It’ll be far easier to raise money when you’re targeting competitive Democratic seats with the blessing of the DFL caucuses and the DFL party,” Day said. “When you look at their disclosure reports, you’re going to see the same donors that give to the House caucus, the Senate caucus. You’re not going to see business interests from out of state all of a sudden wanting to play in this market.”
This is an interesting paradox that progressives have been grappling with for decades. Those of us who remember the Green Party and it’s candidates will remember the dilemma of popularity.
On one hand, third Party challenges, rationale, and logic always arise as reactions to status quo intransigence. The bipartisan regime routinely fails to acknowledge much less resolve multiple crises and popular demands. In many ways the status quo bipartisan regime and it’s participants would rather lose elections than recognize popular sentiments. At the same time, this impulse to ignore and marginalize popular sentiments promotes popular movements that can gain enough momentum to disrupt bipartisan consensus.
The dilemma for popular challenges always ends up being a disruption to the two party duopoly that can accomplish a narrow goal while promoting Fascism. So here we see that the movement actually worked… we now have somewhat legalized marijuana, but the collateral damage was a political defeat in other areas.
Of course the most obvious solution is for Democrats primarily, to stop embracing extreme centrism and recognize and promote popular reforms and policies before they spin off on their own. Had Democrats embraced legalization sooner, there would have no need for a third party challenge in the first place and Democrats would have gotten those votes.
Ken, thank you, I read the article, and I was here during the last election.
The point is those republicans wouldn’t have had a third party to exploit were it not for third party activism in the first place, hence the progressive dilemma. Once you start capturing enough votes, someone will try to exploit that and you can’t control who that will be or how they will do it. If we had truly responsive and representative major Parties, these dilemma’s wouldn’t arise in the first place. This is just one of many issues that Democrats were willing to leave on the table indefinitely, and it’s not the first time that this “centrist/moderate” intransigence has cost them votes.
Right. The simplest way to achieve this is to support only true Progressive Democrats, like Bernie Sanders and AOC. Ever since the democracy-crushing Citizens United Supreme Court decision, most Dem politicians have been bought and are now corrupt, corporate Democrats. There is little difference between them and Republicans, since they both work for the same corporate/wealthy donors instead of the working class, i.e. the majority.
Aside from that, supporters of ending the insane persecution of marijuana consumers need to GET IN THE STREETS, protesting against every corrupt politician that does not actively work to end this shameful, cruel witch-hunt – at the state AND federal level.