Attorney General Keith Ellison answering questions about the investigation into the death of George Floyd at a May 27, 2020, press conference.
Attorney General Keith Ellison answering questions about the investigation into the death of George Floyd at a May 27, 2020, press conference. Credit: John Autey/Pioneer Press/Pool via REUTERS

In political ads for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, the national progressive organization Color of Change highlights Ellison’s history of “holding police accountable” and “leading criminal justice reform.” At the same time, a television spot by Republican candidate Jim Schultz says Ellison “partnered with Ilhan Omar to defund the police.”

Those dueling ads reflect an unlikely reality: While attorneys general usually focus on key duties like representing state agencies in court and handling consumer protection cases, police reform has in many ways defined Ellison’s first term in office and become a major flashpoint in what polls show is a hotly contested reelection campaign.

photo of george floyd
[image_credit]Ben Crump Law[/image_credit][image_caption]George Floyd[/image_caption]
George Floyd’s murder in 2020 put Ellison in the national spotlight as he led the prosecution of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. He secured a conviction for Chauvin and later for former Brooklyn Center officer Kim Potter in a state that had never imprisoned a white officer for killing a Black man. Ellison also waded into fierce debate over how to change the Minneapolis Police Department, becoming the only statewide elected official and one of the most prominent DFLers to endorse a failed charter amendment that would have replaced MPD with a department of public safety.

Schultz, a private practice and business attorney running on an anti-crime message, has relentlessly criticized Ellison’s handling of the Potter case and for “extraordinarily reckless” support for a ballot measure he said “demoralized police.” Republicans hope that resonates with voters who cite crime as a top concern, and 40 county sheriffs and the 10,000-member Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA) have endorsed Schultz.

Jim Schultz
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan[/image_credit][image_caption]Jim Schultz[/image_caption]
“Not only should you lose this election because of it,” Schultz said of Ellison’s charter amendment endorsement during a televised debate Sunday. “You should spend the rest of your career apologizing to the people of Minnesota.”

But Ellison and his supporters argue the incumbent has been a trail-blazing leader who has sought justice and was rightfully focused on police accountability — even before Floyd’s murder and the widespread protests and riots that rocked the Twin Cities.

“I have a track record of bringing people together to drive conversation about how we obtain meaningful reform,” Ellison said at the debate.

Ellison’s deadly force task force

Ellison did not wait to jump into the issue of police reform after being elected. 

In July of 2019, months after he took office, the AG launched a task force with Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner John Harrington meant to find solutions for reducing the number of people killed by police.

Commissioner John Harrington
[image_caption]Commissioner John Harrington[/image_caption]
The panel had 18 members with wide-ranging political views. It included Philando Castile’s uncle, Clarence Castile; Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, a Republican from Alexandria and former sheriff; Elizer Darris from the ACLU and several police leaders such as Brian Peters, who is executive director of the MPPOA.

The task force held four public hearings and three listening sessions throughout the state. And the group met in private to negotiate 28 recommendations and 33 “action steps” that were released in February of 2020.

After Floyd’s murder a few months later, Ellison urged lawmakers to give the report serious consideration. 

The task force report “heavily informed our position” on police reform, said Jeff Hayden, a lobbyist who was a DFL state senator at the time representing the south Minneapolis district where Floyd was murdered. Hayden said the report was helpful in part because it didn’t solely focus on Minneapolis, but instead bolstered a case for statewide changes at the Legislature. Harrington’s background as St. Paul’s former police chief also gave the task force credibility with cops, he said.

“There were things in it that started to talk about police accountability and how people felt about law enforcement broadly,” Hayden said. “It starts to say that people all over the state had some concerns about how they were being treated by law enforcement, and through that there were things we thought could be helpful to law enforcement, frankly, and the community together.”

State Sen. Jeff Hayden
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Walker Orenstein[/image_credit][image_caption]The task force report “heavily informed our position” on police reform, said Jeff Hayden, a lobbyist who was a DFL state senator at the time representing the south Minneapolis district where Floyd was murdered.[/image_caption]
Even the MPPOA urged lawmakers to heed the report’s recommendations, perhaps because the task force did not reach consensus on more controversial issues, such as spelling out when police can use deadly force. Peters told MinnPost at the time that nine months of negotiating yielded “a playbook” for the Legislature.

“That was a perfect example of us coming together and making recommendations,” Peters said in an interview on Tuesday. “House Democrats took those reforms that were recommended and put them on steroids.”

That included a measure to direct the AG to handle all cases when police kill someone. But Republicans blocked it after some county attorneys worried it would be an unwelcome intrusion into local control and make prosecution subject to partisan politics.

The police accountability measures that did pass in July 2020 by the Republican-led Senate and DFL-majority House followed several recommendations from the task force, such as establishing an independent unit within the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to investigate when police kill people and requiring some training for officers to deal with mental health crises. 

The bill also included measures that followed task force recommendations that police “make sanctity of life a core organizational value” and require officers to intervene when they see unreasonable use of force.

The Chauvin and Potter prosecutions

Ellison took on the prosecution of Chauvin and three additional officers at the request of Walz and Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman — and at the urging of some activists, Minneapolis council members and members of Floyd’s family. That handoff came after days of widespread protests over Floyd’s murder, as well as damaging riots that led to activating the National Guard.

Hayden said Ellison, a Black man who had represented Minneapolis in both Congress and the state Legislature, was a trusted voice on the issue, especially for “the Black community and marginalized communities that were at the brunt of and had been dealing with this issue of police misconduct or brutality forever.”

Justin Terrell was leading the state’s Council for Minnesotans of African Heritage at the time, and said they recommended Ellison prosecute after much deliberation “when the city was on fire and people were expressing no confidence in the county attorney’s office.”

Derek Chauvin
[image_credit]Ramsey County Jail[/image_credit][image_caption]Derek Chauvin[/image_caption]
While Freeman could have handed the case to another county, “we understood right away it needed to be somebody that the community trusts,” said Terell, who is now executive director of the Minnesota Justice Research Center and a member of the Peace Officer Standards and Training board. Terrell noted because of that work, he doesn’t make political endorsements.

Ellison quickly added a higher murder charge for Chauvin. And the AG built a prosecution team that included Jerry Blackwell, who in June was nominated for a U.S. District Court Judge position. While Ellison tamped down expectations, telling national media that it’s “hard to convict the police,” a jury did convict Chauvin.

“When the eyes of the world were focused on Minnesota, Minnesota turned to me to prosecute the case involving George Floyd’s murder,” Ellison said. “I came through and showed the world that we had a justice system that could deliver justice.”

Most elected officials in Minnesota praised the Chauvin conviction. And in the debate on Sunday, Schultz said Chauvin did commit murder.

But the case nevertheless became a point of contention when Schultz downplayed Ellison’s role. “The fact is he brought in other attorneys to do it, and no, Keith, you cannot take credit for that,” Schultz said at the debate Sunday. “The fact is there’s people on your staff who did it.”

Ellison shot back by saying: “How would you possibly know? You’ve never prosecuted a single case, you’ve never tried a case, you’ve never argued a motion in court.”

Prosecutor Jerry Blackwell
[image_credit]Pool via REUTERS[/image_credit][image_caption]The AG built a prosecution team that included Jerry Blackwell, who in June was nominated for a U.S. District Court Judge position.[/image_caption]
The AG said he “chaired every single meeting that we had,” came up with the overall legal strategy, helped structure the case and identified “who would do what.”

Several members of the prosecution team have since come to Ellison’s defense amid the heated partisan election. Lola Velazquez-Aguilu, an attorney on the prosecution team, said on Twitter that Ellison “was an exemplary leader, the most skilled legal manager I ever had the privilege to work for.”

Some also praised Ellison publicly at the time. Neal Katyal, a member of the prosecution team, told the New York Times in April of 2021 that Ellison’s involvement was a “gentle steering of the ship” that also included more detailed work like editing legal briefs. Katyal told the paper Ellison was involved in nearly every aspect of the case, including preparing witnesses and giving input on jury selection.

Kimberly A. Potter
[image_credit]Hennepin County Jail[/image_credit][image_caption]Kimberly A. Potter[/image_caption]
The prosecution of Potter, who shot and killed Daunte Wright during a traffic stop in April of 2021, has been far more controversial. Freeman initially gave the case to then-Washington County Attorney Pete Orput, and his office charged Potter with second-degree manslaughter.

But amid activist pressure for a murder charge, protests at Orput’s house, and outrage over another killing of a Black man by police, the county turned over prosecution to Ellison. Days later, Washington County’s lead prosecutor on the case resigned, citing political influence on the job. Imran Ali now works for the MPPOA.

Ellison later upgraded the charge on Potter to first-degree manslaughter.

Schultz said in an interview that there was a “strong argument” for a second-degree manslaughter charge. But he said Ellison ignored two respected county prosecutors and responded to “mob justice” and pressures of the political environment. 

Ellison, Schultz argued, was “much more focused on appeasing a far-left base than justice for Minnesotans. “The up-charge there was deeply disturbing.” 

State Sen. Scott Jensen
[image_caption]Scott Jensen[/image_caption]
Both Schultz and Republican candidate for governor Scott Jensen have said they would vote to commute Potter’s sentence on Minnesota’s three-person pardons board. Potter yelled “Taser” three times before shooting Wright and said she did not mean to use her gun.

Ellison maintains Potter’s “reckless” discharge of a gun met the elements of first-degree manslaughter and points out Hennepin County Judge Regina Chu rejected a motion by Potter’s legal team to dismiss the first-degree charge. A jury, of course, also convicted Potter.

Even so, the incumbent AG has lately argued he was not overly aggressive or punitive in the Potter case. At first, Ellison sought a sentence that was tougher than recommended by state guidelines, and then he changed course, arguing for a sentence within those guidelines — roughly between six and eight-and-a-half years. He later told Fox 9 it would be futile to try to contest the two-year sentence Chu handed down in February.

[cms_ad:x104]
At the time, Ellison’s actions in sentencing Potter drew praise from the MPPOA, even as the organization criticized other aspects of the case. “We also acknowledge the actions of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in advocating for a just sentence for Ms. Potter and commend the professionalism in advancing a sentence commensurate with Ms. Potter’s actions,” Peters said in a 2021 statement.

Schultz maintains that the charge wasn’t justified by the later conviction. “Whether it be in the 1950s South or in 2022 today, we see juries get it wrong sometimes,” Schultz said. “We should have prosecutors who are responsible when they do their job and bring charges that reflect the actual crimes.”

Charter amendment and ‘defund’ politics

Ellison and Schultz have sparred over other issues related to criminal justice, like cash bail policy, the depth of Ellison’s involvement in the Legislature and his role in investigating the $250 million Feeding our Future fraud scandal. 

But on policing, Schultz has lodged his fiercest criticism of Ellison for endorsing the Minneapolis policing charter amendment last year  that voters rejected. The proposal came after a majority of the council in 2020 called for dismantling the police department while they spoke on a stage at Powderhorn Park framed by a large “defund police” sign.

The charter amendment itself would have replaced MPD with a public safety department, and it would have eliminated a minimum staffing requirement for officers and given the council more control over police. The ballot measure said the public safety department would include officers “if necessary.”

The charter amendment divided high-ranking DFLers: Gov. Tim Walz, U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, plus U.S. Rep. Angie Craig opposed the measure; Ellison and U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar backed it. Ellison’s support was notable enough that a pro-amendment campaign ran ads touting his endorsement.

In an op-ed in the StarTribune in September of 2021, Ellison said he hadn’t heard from anyone supporting the amendment who wanted to eliminate police entirely. And he said armed officers would still be necessary to respond to dangerous situations. But he said a “police-only model” doesn’t work for everyone. And he said the measure would help create “systems change,” allowing cops to focus on more dangerous work while a department staffed with mental health professionals and others could respond to nonviolent calls.

Throughout the campaign, Schultz has portrayed Ellison as out of step with voters in DFL-friendly Minneapolis — and even with other Democrats like Klobuchar. He notes the ballot measure was voted down in two city council wards in north Minneapolis.

The south Minneapolis ward where Floyd was killed did vote in favor of the amendment, and Hayden supports Ellison and doesn’t believe the AG wants to defund police. But Hayden also opposed the charter amendment, saying “it seemed that it was very closely tied to the people who wanted to abolish police, and the folks that I represented and the community that I come from didn’t want to abolish police, they just wanted police to do their job and be respectful.”

Ellison, meanwhile, says most of what he wanted from the charter amendment has been accomplished without the ballot measure passing. The city has a public safety department, now led by Cedric Alexander. And Ellison said the city is working on the issues of homelessness, addiction and gang violence prevention “in a more comprehensive way.”

Ellison called defunding the police “never a good idea” and “even worse phrasing.” At the same time, he has campaigned recently with Omar and U.S. Rep. Cori Bush, two politicians who did advocate for defunding police. Asked about Bush on Sunday, Ellison said the Missourian has done “great things” on homelessness, housing, tobacco, student loan debt and “tons of things” unrelated to policing.

“Look, my position is that this is a red herring,” Ellison said. “The police were not defunded, the charter amendment did not succeed. The police have more money now than ever. And so I’m supposed to flee from anybody who is associated with that because I’m scared that Jim Schultz is going to accuse me? That’s not who I am.”

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. Do any Republicans candidates think that 1. any of the five police officers should not have been charged with a crime, 2. that the jury was wrong to convict them or 3. that their judge imposed penalty was not proportionate to their crime? For Schultz, would he have refused to lead the prosecution or have recommended wrist slap penalties? Then say so.

    In my opinion, there has been no more high profile case in the world over the last five years and the Ellison team gets an A+ for the results.

    I have sympathy for Potter’s mistake and the rookie’s difficulty in intervening with a superior officer, but their sentences were appropriate for their connection. Ellison presented evidence – he did not determine guilt or set the sentence. A hedge fund lawyer who has never been in court and no history of supervising lawyers suggests he would have done better? Right!

    Then police reform. Is anyone suggesting it isn’t needed? Is crime in control? Are cases being closed with convictions? Are police themselves satisfied with how things are being? Are there obvious fixes? No on all counts. So we need dialogue, not finger pointing, open minds, not closed ones.

    Defund police was an emotional reaction to yet another totally unjustified police killing. Republicans got mileage out of it in 2020. Have funds been cut? No, they have been increased. Are police changing how they do their job and do they have things like more mental health resources to deal with the craziness.

    What is the most prominent Republican idea – more guns in the hands of more people who have no training and in many cases who are a risk to themselves and others. Bringing back the Wild West with far more powerful guns and today’s Marshall Dillon unable to take guns away from the bad guys.

    Why would a sane person want to work every day knowing that gunmen would not hesitate to shoot police, their wife and children or a schoolroom of students to get even for an imagined offense. Our society is sick – and Republicans seeming acceptance of avoidable gun violence is at odds with their claims to support law and order.

  2. Why can’t Republicans come up with credible, quality candidates for public office anymore? Has Trump Fascism become so ingrained within the party that those who are moderate are afraid of speaking out, afraid of being chastised like the Republican Senators who voted for Biden’s confirmation ?

    Look at what is being offered from the Republican party: conspiracy, fear mongering, inexperience, outright lying of records and past accomplishments, they fester of negativity…..they offer no positive actions or contributions.

    Any voter who will look closely at what the Republican party is offering to the people of Minnesota, and the USA, will see that they are merely skeletons of the many previous Republican office holders like Arnie Carlson and Dwight Eisenhower.

    1. I agree. Yet I also think many voters go for simplistic slogans and answers. Democrats, while well intentioned, did make some mistakes, I think, in the accountability bill–it is one thing to write up well meaning statutes, yet another to be the person, boots on the ground, having to deal with vague, well meaning laws. Add to it primaries that encourage extremes.

  3. I have a great deal of respect for Keith Ellison and I have no doubt, whatever the outcome of this election, that he will continue to have a good and meaningful career serving the people of Minnesota in some capacity. I am certain history will judge him very well for being visionary and passionate about true justice, and if half of Minnesota has forgotten to thank him for what he had done, GOP slam ads notwithstanding, perhaps a new AG will inspire them to.

    It is regrettable that, in the pursuit of justice, Ellison works in a system and a society that accepts the practice of taking small things and twisting and inflating them until you would actually believe that this public servant would, as the Republican ads have it, “cozy up to criminals.”

    You can talk all day about the need to be careful how you conduct yourself and what you say as a public figure. That is all well and good, and it comes with the territory. But anyone with a 6th grade education can see that Ellison has done very good things for the people of this state. That same 6th grader can also see that his opponent is not a shadow of the man, lawyer, public advocate, or citizen that Ellison is.

  4. Schultz’s trumped up rhetoric around aggressive prosecution of police for crimes (like murder) is meant to speak to our emotions. It’s not helpful. I live 6 blocks from George Floyd’s murder and I followed its aftermath closely, and still am. Particularly, I’m concerned about his position that “support for a ballot measure that demoralized” the police department. To my mind, that reads like “police feel demoralized when a white cop murders a black man and gets held accountable for it.” If police can’t handle accountability they should not become police men and women. Racists should not become police men and women. Our city is black, yellow, red, brown, and white, and everything in between. The police department should look like the city that employs them. Thus, the retirement and resignation of lots of police in Minneapolis and probably around the state. Schultz isn’t qualified by resume to take on AG Ellison. I should also add that “defund” the police is over and done with. There’s not a single ballot in Minnesota with a “defund the police” measure on it; nor is there a single city council throughout the entire state that’s talking about “defunding.” This isn’t a yes or no, black or white, question. There’s lots of conversations and policy to be made around how our communities want to be protected by its police force.

  5. Police and policing is an issue, but it’s not truly relevant to the AG contest. The Jensen campaign’s trying to hang it onto the gubernatorial contest as well. It wouldn’t be surprising if the state GOP still try to find a way to it into the campaigns for Secretary of State and State Auditor as well!

  6. The left leaning Strib editorial board couldn’t even endorse Ellison, that says something. Of course they would never endorse a republican.

    I think Ellison is probably toast.

    1. I agree. But it will be closer than it should be considering Ellison’s decades long support of gangs and cop killers. But we’re supposed to conclude those facts aren’t relevant to this election.

    2. Vs. a guy that has never been in a court room? Not a KE fan but , a rationale person would say no I don’t want a guy that has never flown an airplane to fly me to Japan! AB, that’s reality, want a heart surgeon that’s never been in an operating room the to do a valve replacement for you? Get real dude, party is one thing, rational thinking is another.

  7. As I see it, the problem is that Schulz was allowed to take a law and order position, without addressing the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers. Without doing that, what he stands for is basically the brutalization of the people of Minneapolis.

    1. Brutalizing the people of Minneapolis gets votes from outstate and suburban voters.

      1. The downside is what we are seeing. Police have lost their credibility and criminals are filling the vacuum. Carjacking is the classic example. There are cars parked all over Minneapolis. You see them everywhere. There just aren’t enough police officers to watch all of them. When thieves are made aware of that, they increase the number of carjackings. It’s a classic tradeoff.

  8. Crime is up, big time, under the watch of our fiddle playing Governor and Keith.

Leave a comment