Minnesota House
The 2022 race for control of the Legislature was presaged by a swirl of retirements, incumbents running for other offices and court-drawn redistricting maps that changed the makeup of districts and placed many incumbents together in single races. Credit: MinnPost photo by Tom Olmscheid

Note: This story was updated at 9:02 a.m. Wednesday after all precincts reported.

The Minnesota DFL defied the usual expectations of a midterm backlash against the party of a sitting president, winning full control of the Legislature in elections Tuesday by retaining a majority in the state House and flipping the state Senate from Republican hands.

The GOP had hoped to win seats in battleground legislative races across the Twin Cities suburbs, which are usually key to control of the Legislature. But the promise to implement tough-on-crime legislation and offer big tax breaks with a large budget surplus didn’t lead to victories. Instead, Republicans were brushed back by Democrats in places like Coon Rapids, Lino Lakes, Blaine and Shakopee, where the DFL ran on protecting abortion access and pumping more money into K-12 schools. 

In Greater Minnesota, the DFL held seats in St. Cloud and eked out enough seats in the one-time DFL stronghold of northeastern Minnesota, even as Republicans gained some ground. Senate Democrats even won a seat the GOP had long expected to take in the Moorhead area.

While it became clear early Wednesday that Democrats would keep their slim House majority, political balance in the state Senate early Wednesday was unknown until after 3 a.m. That’s because results were not fully reported in a close race between DFLer Grant Hauschild of Hermantown and Republican Andrea Zupancich of Babbitt. But later in the morning, Hauschild was the apparent winner, delivering the DFL its 34th seat in the 67-member chamber and causing Senate Majority Leader Jeremy Miller, R-Winona, to concede.

In a speech at a DFL party, House Speaker Melissa Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park, said Minnesotans want “fully funded public schools,” affordable health care and an “economy that works for everyone.” She pledged to address climate change, gun violence and “protect democracy.”

“And, by the way: They want a government that respects their personal freedoms and their bodily autonomy,” Hortman said.

Gov. Tim Walz summed it up as: “There is no red wave.”

DFL likely to win House, retain significant legislative influence

The result puts Democrats in the driver’s seat at the Legislature, which next year will decide how to spend a record-setting $12.1 billion surplus.

But the party will have narrow governing majorities. In the House, unofficial results project a 70-64 majority, while in the Senate the DFL will have just a one-vote edge. That means the DFL will have to keep together disparate ends of their political spectrum, which spans more conservative Democrats in Greater Minnesota and parts of the metro suburbs seats to more progressive ones in the Twin Cities core.

A divided state government has been a hallmark of Minnesota politics lately. The DFL has had only held a “trifecta” — control of the House, Senate and governor’s office — for two years since 1992, according to party chair Ken Martin. That was 2013 and 2014. And Republicans haven’t had any since elections for the Legislature became officially partisan in the 1970s.

When the DFL in 2018 won back a House majority fueled by backlash to then-President Donald Trump, Minnesota — at least briefly — became the only state in the country where the Legislature was divided. Alaska’s House soon after was ruled by a coalition mostly of Democrats while the Senate was Republican. Virginia voted for a split House and Senate in 2021, but it’s still a rarity.

There are more states, like Wisconsin and Michigan, where one party has controlled both chambers of the Legislature but there is a governor from the opposite party.

Since 2018, the House DFL, Republican-led Senate, and Walz have reached two major budget deals and navigated the COVID-19 pandemic.

But in their latest test, lawmakers could not figure out how to spend most of a record-setting surplus. The Legislature did strike an agreement on two big issues: paying for pandemic bonus checks for frontline workers, and refilling an unemployment trust fund that was drained during the early days of the pandemic.

But Walz and the Legislature failed to complete a deal they had reached to spend roughly $4 billion of that remaining surplus on tax cuts and credits and use another $4 billion for government spending in priority areas like education and long-term care. Another $4 billion would be left unspent in budget reserves.

What’s leftover instead now is about $12.1 billion over the rest of this budget period and the two years that cover the next budget. For context, the last two-year budget was $52 billion.

Republicans had pushed for a larger amount to be sent back to voters in the form of tax cuts. The DFL may want to use more of it on spending. Democrats will have far greater leverage to set a budget how they’d like, and perhaps total control. One issue that most in the DFL support: legalizing recreational marijuana.

But lawmakers will also take up other priorities, including, potentially a package of publicly-financed construction projects known as a bonding bill.

A campaign yields wins for the DFL

In the testy campaign for state House, Republicans pinned their hopes on a message that Democrats had not adequately controlled crime or supported police. Most GOP candidates were endorsed by the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association.

They also campaigned on tax cuts as Minnesotans reported inflation as a top concern. Both issues polled well for Republicans.

But Democrats painted Republicans as extremists, particularly on the issue of abortion. The GOP said it would not try to severely limit abortion, especially in light of state constitutional protections and a recent court ruling cementing the right to an abortion in Minnesota. But the DFL nevertheless argued during the campaign that the GOP would try to chip away at abortion access or eliminate it altogether.

The issue perhaps resonated, especially in the most critical battlegrounds.

House GOP leader Kurt Daudt declined to comment, but a spokesman said he called Hortman after it became clear the DFL would win.

Miller, who is now the outgoing Senate Majority Leader, said in a statement that Senate Republicans “will continue to fight for keeping life affordable for working Minnesotans and seniors, safer communities and support for law enforcement, and more opportunities for students to be successful in the classroom and beyond.”

The Senate DFL leader, the retiring Melisa López Franzen of Edina, said voters “rejected fear and division in favor of a positive vision for our state and future.”

The Senate DFL campaign chair Erin Murphy said the party’s agenda will be for “an economy that works, freedom to make our own healthcare decisions, safe communities no matter where we live, and an end to the partisan extremes that have kept our state from moving forward.”

In the crucial Twin Cities suburbs, Democrats held their own, winning many key seats that Republicans had hoped to flip. For example, unofficial results show DFLers won two House seats in Coon Rapids, which will be held by Rep. Zack Stephenson and Jerry Newton, a DFL state senator who ran this year for the House.

The DFL beat Republican Rep. Erik Mortensen, a far-right figure who was alienated from his own fellow Republicans. They hung on in a crucial seat in St. Cloud, and flipped a district in North Mankato held by Rep. Susan Akland. DFLer Jeff Brand, who lost to Akland as an incumbent legislator in 2020, will return to the Legislature.

Democrats also beat Republican Rep. Donald Raleigh in the Blaine area in a seat that was less friendly to Raleigh after redistricting. And DFLer Josiah Hill of Stillwater beat Republican Mark Bishofsky, a Republican that some centrist GOPers had opposed due to his ties to far-right views.

In northeastern Minnesota, Republican Natalie Zeleznikar appeared to narrowly oust 46-year incumbent Rep. Mary Murphy of Hermantown and the GOP’s Rep. Spencer Igo of Grand Rapids beat Rep. Julie Sandstede of Hibbing. The GOP flipped another seat in the Cloquet area, winning after the retirement of Rep. Mike Sundin, a DFLer from Esko. And the GOP even appears to have beat Rep. Rob Ecklund in a seat that includes Ely, Grand Marais and International Falls.

But it was not enough to take the House for Republicans.

In the Senate, Democrats ousted Republican Sen. Roger Chamberlain of Lino Lakes. Republicans did win several seats in the suburbs, including a crucial Anoka-area seat represented by Sen. Jim Abeler.

The Senate DFL had a strong showing, however, in Greater Minnesota, where they kept a seat that includes Moorhead and rural areas around it. The retiring Sen. Kent Eken had won the district for years even as Republicans won big in presidential races and other elections. This time around, meteorologist and DFLer Rob Kupec beat Republican Dan Bohmer. Sen. Aric Putnam also won a swing seat in St. Cloud for the DFL.

And the Senate came down to the district once held by DFL leader Tom Bakk, who is retiring but caused a political earthquake by leaving the party in 2020 to caucus with Republicans as an independent. Bakk even endorsed the Republican candidate Zupancich to replace him. But Hauschild won out, giving the DFL a crucial victory and full power at the Capitol in St. Paul.

Correction: An earlier version of this story said the DFL had a “trifecta” in state government for four years starting in 2013. It was only for two years.

Join the Conversation

47 Comments

  1. And just like that, the MNGOP fades to irrelevance for at least 2 years. But hey, at least that empty land has representatives it can relate to.

      1. See: “nihilistic naysaying” comment.
        Progressives actually try to make the world better, rather than just willfully wreck it and then say “look at this wreck”

  2. And Herr is the next ripple of trump. Unfettered Dems running things .
    Never good

    1. Don’t worry. They’ll chicken out of doing anything bold, just like they always do.

      That’s the major criticism I have of my party.

      1. The democrats that won in the suburbs tend to be more moderate. And the choice sometimes is who is less of a whackadoo? You have to win to pass legislation and usually compromise to get the deal done. Bold moves require lots of buy in, something you don’t get when hurling insults and one liners.
        Republicans need to run more moderates and democrats need to learn throwing money at a problem usually hasn’t resolved the issue and there is a need for closer tracking of where the money goes. An example of something both parties you would think could manage would be addressing the lack of placements for assaultive offenders who are in the community. But no, they can’t get it done.

    2. Just a tyrant. Absolute power will do that for a person. His way or the highway. But now it will be Walz “unbound”.

      1. You might want to look up the definitions of “tyrant” and “absolute power.” Spoiler alert: they don’t mean “governmental action I’ve been told that I don’t like.”

        1. Feel free to speak with Legislators who have dealt with the Governor and see if “tyrant” isn’t accurate.

          1. Again, “I didn’t get my way!” is tyranny only to those who haven’t advanced past the third-grade. Those who understand that elected officials have their own agendas to pursue are capable of more mature analysis.

  3. The question with such narrow majorities becomes: who are the responsible Repubs and where do they come from? Do they want to participate in representative government or just nihilistic naysaying? Will the sane ones tell their MAGA extremists to go fulminate for the cameras while they participate in actual governing, or are they all just a voting block of mindless obstruction?

    That’s what everyone needs to watch for now. Is there ANY sense left in the Repub party, because with a one vote Dem majority, sane Repubs could have a huge voice in all matters…

    1. Bonding bills require a 60% majority in both the House and Senate. That’s about the only leverage they will have to break things and wreak havoc. They know their base prefers that to improving rural MN.

      1. Considering how much state bonding money flows to rural areas, that would seem to be unlikely.

        1. People vote against their economic interests all the time.

          Gotta stick to the Cities.

  4. I credit our school systems for the rational outcomes amid reactionary grievance and general craziness noise we voters have endured.

    I salute those who serve our democracy– holding office, running elections, and enduring intimidation and threats based on lies and conspiracy theories.

    1. “I credit our school systems for the rational outcomes ”

      The same systems that have students so far under grade level that even staying back a year won’t help?

  5. My only hope is that perhaps we have some governing from the middle (where most of us live and think) and not from the ultra left or ultra right crazy land fringes.

    1. Easy there, you’re treading awfully close to “both-sides” and ignoring the shifting Overton Window.

      The DFL “is” the moderate middle these days.

      (I just voted and have already forgotten the name of the Socialist candidate on the ballot)

  6. Hey Joe, Dennis, Ron, William, thoughts? Bueller…Bueller?

    Ah well, see ya in February I guess.

    1. You’re far more magnanimous than I. My guess is that the “communications budget” is under serious reevaluation.

    2. February is when the budget forecast comes out setting the stage for a $58 billion (minimum) biannual budget which won’t include the “surplus” spending from the no longer $12 billion that the Governor says that we have. We are going to need all that pot we can smoke!

      1. It’s also when campaign season starts again, which is what I was getting at. You’re apparently just one of the ordinary dupes, which is kinda sad, really.

        1. And in February the new Legislature will be in session deciding a budget for Minnesota. Which matters a lot for Minnesotans. You are correct that the 2024 Presidential election campaign will probably start around then too, which will have little effect on Minnesota, a flyover state.

  7. Well, I’m no political historian but it seems to me the DFL never holds these trifecta’s for more than two years because when they get the chance, instead of blasting through multiple crises they decide to leave all kinds of problems on the table out “blowback” anxiety. Let’s hope they take this opportunity to blast as many crises as possible into oblivion, and run on their success rather lose while trying explain why they didn’t do as much as they could have.

    1. I wholeheartedly agree with Paul on this about the blowback anxiety of the DFL. I still wish Obama would have acted more forcefully after his election. We have heard promises from conservative candidates on what they would do one day one if they had been elected. And we have seen some of them act. No kumbaya comments from them after being elected. Progressives and centrists should not make apologies for using the backing of the voters to enact changes for the better – now.
      And please Dennis, your comment would hold more weight if some of the lunatics on the far right that you seem to infer should still be considered when passing legislation were not the ones that showed up at election poles or ballot drop boxes in camouflage, faces hidden, bearing arms. No one but no one on the left showed up where folks were lawfully voting dressed like that.

    2. The DFL has only had the one trifecta in the last 30 years, and that’s one more than the GOP has had. I’m not sure how well we can extrapolate from one data point.

      1. Mark, you should study the difference between statistical analysis and political science. This isn’t about data points.

          1. 2011-2013 budget 35.7 billion
            2012-2013 budget 52 billion

            A 68% increase in ten years, which is what we’ve all received in wages during that time. And this year’s budget will approach or exceed 60 billion which would be an increase of 15%, again, the same amount as our wage increase this coming year.

            1. There’s good data, and there’s bad data. There’s good use of data, and there’s bad use of data.

              When comparing spending, revenues, or prices, over time, it’s necessary to use real (or inflation adjusted) dollars.

              When comparing government spending over time, it’s most useful to compare spending as a percentage of GDP, whether it be for a state or a country.

              1. Thank you for the information and/or not providing what you wanted. “Inflation adjusted” will mean more now obviously but for the last five years or so it has been something around zero.

    3. Actually a Republican ballot initiative to ban gay marriage failed. Then having been drug kicking and screaming into the initiative Democrats finally passed what was by then a safe bet.

  8. Is there any reason the DFL can’t draw new line for state and federal offices? You know, like Texas did a while back. They didn’t bother to wait for another census.

    We can also pass election reform, so we can catch up to those states that have surpassed us in access to the ballot. No reason we can register high school kids before they turn 18.

  9. The border cities are going to be a lot of fun. Fireworks and Spotted Cow on one side of the border, no tax on clothing and legal weed on the other.

  10. “In the crucial Twin Cities suburbs, Democrats held their own, winning many key seats that Republicans had hoped to flip. For example, unofficial results show DFLers won two House seats in Coon Rapids, which will be held by Rep. Zack Stephenson and Jerry Newton, a DFL state senator who ran this year for the House.”

    Stephenson was an incumbent, and even less of a surprise would be Newton who was on the Coon Rapids City Council from 1994-2000, the Anoka-Hennepin School Board from 2000-2008, was a State Legislator from 2008-2010 and then again from 2012-2016, and a State Senator from 2016-2022. And he won by a crushing 232 of over 17,000 votes against a political newcomer.

      1. It is. And the thought that the GOP hoped to flip a seat held for decades is silly. As is the thought that the GOP thought that they could win against an incumbent pushing for increased gambling in the state.

    1. Not sure what that means. We’ll see if electing an 85 year old career politician proves to be wise. See, Biden, Joe or Pelosi, Nancy.

    2. Redistricting caused some unpredictability there. And still, MN govt moved (slightly) leftward. It was a safe, not radical, move by MN voters. Practically speaking, given the diversity of political views the DFL (and Dems, in general) has, it’s not much different than having a split government. But it is a message for the GOP, even if it’s not a political mandate. A warning shot, I think. While a democracy is better with multiple healthy political parties, it may do just fine with a single large, but diverse party than giving any voice to autocracy in the name of preserving the existence of two major parties. Quite frankly, the disappearance of the current version of the GOP, which is far more radical than conservative, might enable the Democratic party to split into multiple parties without trying to maintain the façade that it is a monolith, or even generally very liberal overall.

      1. “And still, MN govt moved (slightly) leftward.”

        One Senate seat and a handful of House seats. Very slight. Although the number of counties continues to trend GOP winning elections only requires winning two, or at most, seven counties (the Metro).

        1. Doom in Minnesota is a foregone conclusion, see Walter Mondale electoral count total, unless the GOP can spend at least an equal amount of money than the DFL. Voting by younger people was indeed up with about 30% of 18-29 year olds voting in this midterm election, which among females is the age most likely to have an abortion which might have been a factor.

  11. And the bonus of ridding ourselves of GOP front group Cannabis Legalization parties only there to reduce D votes. Remember “Geese Unlimited”? Declared victory and went away…

  12. Wow, it’s interesting to see how the Minnesota DFL has defied the usual expectations of a midterm backlash against the party of a sitting president. It’s great to see that they have won full control of the Legislature, retaining a majority in the state House and flipping the state Senate from Republican hands. It’s also inspiring to see how they ran on important issues such as protecting abortion access and pumping more money into K-12 schools. With the party in the driver’s seat at the Legislature, it will be exciting to see how they spend the record-setting $12.1 billion surplus and address issues such as climate change, gun violence, and protecting democracy. I hope that they can keep together the disparate ends of their political spectrum and work towards a positive vision for Minnesota’s future.

Leave a comment