The slow drawdown was done so that the Army Corps of Engineers could inspect the upper and lower locks and dams at St. Anthony Falls.
The slow drawdown was done so that the Army Corps of Engineers could inspect the upper and lower locks and dams at St. Anthony Falls. Credit: Mississippi Watershed Management Organization

For those who took the time to check it out, a glimpse of a less-engineered Mississippi River was available in Minneapolis last week, when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lowered water levels below St. Anthony Falls. People frolicked on the river floor, which was visible under the Stone Arch Bridge, and enjoyed a much closer experience to river wildlife. 

The slow drawdown was by 12 feet, beginning Saturday and completed Tuesday, and done so that the Army Corps of Engineers could inspect the upper and lower locks and dams at St. Anthony Falls. The river was then allowed to rise again after the inspection finished Thursday.

Mississippi River Drawdown at St. Anthony Falls
[image_credit]Mississippi Watershed Management Organization[/image_credit]
Only about a half-mile patch of the river was lowered, a single pool between the upper and lower St. Anthony locks. But it was enough of a vision of a wilder Mississippi River to spark curiosity. And an obvious question:

Why can’t the river be like this all the time? 

The short answer is: It’s complicated.

It turns out that there are a lot of interests at play affecting water level management. “There are always conflicting desires for the use of the water,” said Doug Snyder, executive director of the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization, the joint-powers local government unit representing Twin Cities communities along the Mississippi River.

The lock and dam system was originally built to raise water levels in order to allow commercial navigation as well as provide a source of power generation and water supply. But as Snyder noted, the water levels are also kept up in places for recreational purposes.

Mississippi River Drawdown at St. Anthony Falls
[image_credit]Mississippi Watershed Management Organization[/image_credit]
One of those many interests bowed out in 2014, when the Mississippi River was closed to commercial navigation above St. Anthony Falls because invasive carp were making their way upstream. The locks and dams along the Mississippi are maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Coast Guard to insure large barges can navigate the river. 

Though commercial navigation is no longer allowed on the Upper Mississippi, other travel is still permitted, and the river also has sections that are authorized for power generation. The lower water level would prohibit both activities, said George Stringham with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ St. Paul district. Congress would have to sign off on any plan to permanently alter water levels. 

Keeping water levels higher also helps Minneapolis stock its water supply, said Whitney Clark, executive director of nonprofit Friends of the Mississippi River. Damming water in certain spots in Minneapolis also helps with flood management downstream. There is a natural fluctuation of water levels to consider, he added, like heavy snow years.

Mississippi River Drawdown at St. Anthony Falls
[image_credit]Mississippi Watershed Management Organization[/image_credit]
Yet Clark feels management of the locks and dams system should include more drawdowns, ones that are much larger and longer than what took place last week. “I’ve found the Army Corps of Engineers to be responsive to complaints from people like me thinking about the ecology of the river,” said Clark.

Ever since commercial navigation has been halted, Friends of the Mississippi River and the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization have endeavored to track the health of flora and fauna in the watershed. Clark says the lower water levels allow more land along the river to get sunlight, while seeds are able to take root and grow as water levels naturally rise. That in turn stabilizes bottom sediments which keeps water cleaner and clearer.

Mississippi River Drawdown at St. Anthony Falls
[image_credit]Mississippi Watershed Management Organization[/image_credit]
Aside from lowering water levels, another environmentally friendly tack would be to strategically deploy the locks and dams system so that water movement more closely mimics the natural flow of the Mississippi River — higher in spring from melted snow, lower in late summer — to help maximize plant and wildlife growth along the river. 

To Snyder, the best way to come up with a plan for managing the river, one that comes close to properly balancing human interest with ecological needs, is to establish a body formed to bring all interested parties together and endowed with the authority to make certain decisions. 

As Snyder likes to say, quoting an old adage, “Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over.”

Mississippi River Drawdown at St. Anthony Falls
[image_credit]Mississippi Watershed Management Organization[/image_credit]

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. Nice article. I have a much better sense of the competing interests in play here, and also how some changes might be made. The pictures are really helpful.

    1. John, I finally have it figured out that lock and dam number one isn’t the first one. The first one is upper Saint Anthony lock and dam and falls. The next is the lower Saint Anthony lock and dam and falls: the one that was opened last week to lower the pond between it and the upper. I suppose the numbering happened before these two lots were built in the 50s.

  2. I was happy to see this article, since I had the same question. But it still leaves the question unanswered:
    – The hydro plant near St. Anthony Main has intake gates above St. Anthony Falls. Leaving the gates open in the downstream dam would have no impact on it. (It would be fun to see that plant discharging with the pond lowered. It wasn’t last week.)
    – Is there actually any use of water from this pond for Minneapolis water intake? The Strib just had an article about the water intake being up in Fridley.

    So, what exactly is the practical reason the pond can’t be left drained, aside from existing rules?

  3. thanx for the article; see above comments: room for more info; appreciate limited pix, room for more
    ehl

Leave a comment