St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter
St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter Credit: REUTERS/Eric Miller

Tim Nelson reports for MPR: “St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter says he’d like to see the city’s rent control initiative include a 15-year exemption for new housing — and have that exemption be retroactive. That was among the policy proposals Carter outlined Tuesday during his State of the City address. The mayor also said he’s going to seek federal funding to add more officers to the city’s police force after a notable political battle over the department during budget talks last year. And he also said he’ll impose additional restrictions on the use of no-knock warrants.”

KSTP-TV’s Kyle Brown reports: “The St. Louis Park High School athletic director has sent a letter to the New Prague activities director stating his school would no longer compete with New Prague High School after a ‘racist experience’ last week. Athletic Director Andrew Ewald said in his letter Monday that racist behavior was directed at the St. Louis Park boys hockey team during a game on Feb. 15. He said his decision to cut ties with New Prague was also influenced by more allegations of racism against another school in the Metro West Conference.”

MPR’s Jon Collins and the AP report: “The fate of three ex-Minneapolis police officers federally charged with depriving George Floyd of his right to medical care will go to the jury Wednesday morning following closing statements Tuesday from the prosecution and defense .… In closing statements Tuesday, prosecutor Manda Sertich told the court the three ex-cops disregarded their training and their duty to intervene to stop Chauvin’s unreasonable use of force to subdue Floyd. … Defense attorneys for the three men used their closing statements to push back on the idea their clients didn’t do their duty as they knew it.”

The Pioneer Press reports: “The University of St. Thomas will have to look elsewhere for a home for its new ice hockey arena after the Town & Country Club rejected its unsolicited offer to purchase the historic St. Paul golf course. On Tuesday evening, the private country club said its board of directors had voted unanimously not to entertain the $61.4 million proposal.”

Ryan Faircloth writes in the Star Tribune: “Hennepin Technical College President Merrill Irving Jr. faced accusations last year of belittling employees with disabilities and making sexually derogatory comments about coworkers, according to investigation reports obtained by the Star Tribune. But Irving remains on the job after leaders of the Minnesota State colleges and universities system determined that his ‘derisive statements about individuals of a protected class’ violated respectful workplace procedures but not its harassment policy, system spokesman Doug Anderson said.”

At KMSP-TV, Theo Keith reports, “Republican lawmakers say the answer to keeping more snowbirds from leaving Minnesota is to get rid of the state’s tax on Social Security income. Tuesday, the Senate Taxes committee held a hearing on several measures either cutting or eliminating the tax. While the panel did not pass any of the bills, the committee’s chair, state Sen. Carla Nelson, predicted that her proposal would quickly pass the Republican-controlled Senate. … Minnesota would join 37 other states that do not tax Social Security income.

WCCO-TV’s Reg Chapman reports: “A celebration of life was held Tuesday for a 15 year-old who was the pride of Minneapolis’ north side. Hundreds came out to support the family of Deshaun Hill as they laid him to rest. The teen was shot and killed earlier this month, a homicide that sent a shock wave of pain through the community and city. … An ‘A’ honor roll student, a stand-out athlete, a loving son, an incredibly patient older brother, and a role model. DHill is remembered as a young man who did everything right; a teenager who had big dreams and a family who loved and supported him through it all.”

Dana Ferguson reports for the Forum News Service: “A Minnesota environmental committee on Tuesday, Feb. 22, moved forward a proposal to provide more than $23 million in grants to farmers and communities hit hardest by the 2021 drought. On a 12-6 vote, the House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee advanced the Walz administration proposal to allocate $5 million to the Department of Agriculture to issue $10,000 grants to livestock producers and specialty crop farmers. Ag officials said priority would be placed on helping those in areas of the state that experienced ‘exceptional’ conditions.”

Says Krystal Frasier for KSTP-TV, “According to the Minnesota State Patrol, 187 crashes were reported in Minnesota from 10 a.m. – 4 p.m. on Tuesday. These crashes included 17 with injuries, one of which was considered serious. There have been no fatalities. MSP also said there were also 79 crashes and 36 vehicle spinouts from 5 a.m. – 10 a.m. Tuesday due to the weather across the entire state. Out of those, there were 10 crashes with injuries, but none were considered to have serious injuries.”

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. Has anyone attempted to quantify the number of “snow birds” who have changed their official residence and no longer pay Minnesota income tax? The number of Minnesota residents for whom the tax on their social security benefits is burdensome?

    Probably not, since there’s no need for facts to get in the way of a good political opportunity.

    Republicans propose a $600 million tax cut when the majority of taxpayers stay right here in Minnesota, pay little to no tax on their benefits. Those who can afford to relocate simply in order to escape Minnesota taxes likely are going to do so whether or not theses benefits are taxed. Too, they will find in many states that the income tax savings will be offset by higher property taxes and broader sales taxes.

    I’m not a fan of the DFL proposal either but at least it will cost less than one-sixth the GOP proposal and target its relief to some extent.

    1. There is a tremendous amount of inertia preventing residents from leaving the state just to save on taxes. The problem I see with MN taxing SS benefits is that few other states do it, and it’s just one more reason for people not to move here. When you factor in our already very high tax rate, low inheritance tax threshold, and horrible winters I can’t imagine too many retirees moving to Minnesota unless they have family they want to be close to.

    2. I know of many people who live outside Minnesota for more than 6 months and they are not all financially well off. Not sure why you have to impugn people for doing what is best for them. Our state clearly does not when it continually rakes in more and more of our money. Yet everything we always hear from the DFL is that we need more tax money. Maybe make this place better for everyone that taking more and more of their hard earned money.

    3. A financial retirement advisor says 29,000 MN people a year change their residence upon retirement. It gets harder to play the game, but its doable and saves you a lot of money. Not sure where he got his numbers, but I know a handful of people in the process.

      I’m 57, my plans are to be out of MN by age 67-70. Maybe a lake place in Wisconsin, maybe a house in the mountains in Tennessee. Both states don’t tax my SS.

      1. Wisconsin is not known to be a low tax state (gas taxes, property taxes, etc).

        I’m not sure about Tennessee, but low taxes generally equate with poor services and/or dependence on wealthier states (the deep south bible belt states have the greatest dependence on federal social welfare programs).

  2. Not sure why Mayor Carter proposed giving gun owners gun safes except that he’d keep a record of who asked for them.

      1. The gun safes? Yep! It was in the Pioneer Press!
        Moving out of MN on retirement? Yes, with the two big cities having crime the way it is, its bound to make its way out. The two big cities are ruining the state.

  3. Man Mayor Carter is in quite a pickle. He backed this terrible bill, giving it his support, and now all the predicted outcomes have occured. All these outcomes were known. So now by backing the new constuction carve out that every other rent control municipality has, he is treating those mom and pop owners of small buildings as second class citizens – they won’t even get vacancy decontrol to help. He alienates the activists that wrote this bill. Lawsuits are inevitable, which will throw it to court and draw out the uncertainty. If you were a builder, woudl you trust that a future St. Paul council would not reverse this carve-out? Or another citizen petition might try to reinstate it? It will take a long time for St. Paul to recover from this mess.

    1. To be completely fair, Carter said he wanted to make changes when he came out in support of this. But yeah, supporting this at all was really stupid. He owns this mess.

      The lawsuits will be interesting. Rent control has been upheld elsewhere and isn’t blatantly unconstitutional like the tenant protection ordinance that got struck down. On the other hand, this is the most restrictive ordinance anywhere, and there was no rent control at all previously.

      1. I predict lawsuits either way. if the city moves now to approve this exemption with an effecitve date 1y out from November they may get sued because maybe they can’t actualy pass a law change for a year? I know some on the city council say they can’t move the amendment forward at all for a year – so his desire to pass a bill right now effective Nov 2022 to get building back on track today may not work – or may get them sued. waiting to Nov to vote and approve just prolongs the uncertainty…. I still think developers are going to worry that if the council can giveth an exception like other cities a future council can taketh away. The mere existence of the rent control regulation, especially one so extreme just casts a lot of doubt over everything going forward even with a hypothetical exemption in place.

Leave a comment