Roseau is building a $6.8 million apartment complex that is almost entirely funded by the public.
Roseau is building a $6.8 million apartment complex that is almost entirely funded by the public. Credit: City of Roseau

The news that Polaris Inc. wants to bring new jobs to Roseau in northwest Minnesota — where the company manufactures snowmobiles, ATVs and military vehicles — has been a welcome development in the small city of 2,700 people.

“If I’m going to add a hundred people, the majority of those are going to be relocation candidates to the Roseau area, which is awesome,” said Nathan Hanson, the Polaris plant director in Roseau. “Build our tax base, the school, you know, grow our community. Everything that any town in the state of Minnesota would like.”

There’s a problem, however. Right now, there’s almost no housing for those new employees or their families in and around Roseau. Hanson said about 80 workers are already living in temporary quarters — mostly hotels and some Polaris-owned homes — as they look for permanent housing. And those in hotels sometimes have to couch surf when the city hosts youth hockey tournaments, which happen regularly in the hockey-mad part of the state.

To help its housing crunch, Roseau has had to take unusual measures, morphing essentially into a housing developer and bypassing the private sector. Now, the city is building a $6.8 million apartment complex that is almost entirely funded by the public.

Roseau is also not alone in its housing struggles. Business and civic leaders say a shortage of housing is widespread in small cities and towns across Greater Minnesota, where employees of bigger companies struggle to find housing and developers rarely build new housing.

“We have the jobs,” said Roseau mayor Dan Fabian, a former GOP state legislator. “We just need the people.”

Why there’s a housing shortage

Todd Peterson, Roseau’s community development coordinator, said there has been a housing shortage for the 25 years he’s lived in the city. Large manufacturers need a lot of labor, and those workers are usually making enough money to disqualify them from affordable housing limited by income. At the same time, those workers aren’t earning enough money to entice developers who need to charge higher rents to make money on a new project, Peterson said. The median household income in Roseau is $52,794, according to the latest Census data. In other words, Roseau residents “can’t afford new construction,” Peterson said.

To add to the problem, there is more government money available for building subsidized affordable housing, Peterson said. It’s far trickier to fund homes without those income limits. “All we do is just keep bidding up the existing stock and nothing ever gets added,” Peterson said.

In 2014, Roseau and the state government subsidized the construction of a 30-unit apartment building that was also aimed in part at housing Polaris workers. But that was seven years ago, and there is still an acute housing need.

Hanson said there is strong demand for Polaris products and said the company has been working to add more employees since COVID-19 related business shutdowns last April. “It’s really to get us fully staffed where we need to be,” Hanson said. “Right now, with the housing, with some of the challenges, we do have some temporary employees. We’d like to backfill them with full-time Polaris employees. And that’s where that 100 number comes, from just to support the demand for the product that we build here in Roseau.”

At times, the company has had as many as 120 workers living in temporary housing. Hanson said that has consequences. For instance, three families recently moved to Minnesota from Texas for Polaris jobs. One family found housing. Two didn’t, got discouraged and moved back to Texas. “It hurts when you see that because they moved here, they liked everything,” Hanson said.

Fabian, the Roseau mayor, said one of the city’s biggest economic engines is youth hockey tournaments in the winter. Most weekends, the city hosts 16 teams. But because hotels are filled with workers, they have a tough time hosting everyone. That means people stay elsewhere, or fewer teams might come to town, which hurts local businesses.

How Roseau is trying to address the housing crunch

Peterson and Fabian said ideally the private sector would take care of building housing. But that’s not really an option right now. “I’ve basically told our city council: ‘If we want housing, the city is going to build it,’” Peterson said.

Roseau first started discussing a city-owned apartment building in January of 2020. At the time, Polaris had said it was getting very difficult to find housing, and when Peterson surveyed all major apartment owners, he found vacancy rates were “basically zero.”

More than a year later, construction is underway on the $6.8 million, 37-unit complex. Roseau’s Economic Development Authority will own the building, most of which will be paid for by a mix of bonds and cash from the city and the Northwest Minnesota Multi-County Housing and Redevelopment Authority — a public nonprofit that works to build housing. The state kicked in $1.58 million in March from a small grant program it runs to help build workforce housing. Polaris donated $100,000, and a medical center and another manufacturer each gave $5,000. 

Roseau bought and donated the land for the apartment building, waived other fees and costs, and spent lots of time trying to figure out how exactly to develop apartments that aren’t considered affordable housing. Peterson said the city itself is barred from building market-rate apartments by state law, but not affordable-rated apartments that it would have a hard time filling.

Peterson said the city expects the Roseau apartment building, called the Eleven01 project, to be open this summer.

Polaris plant
[image_credit]Creative Commons/Jimmy Emerson, DVM[/image_credit][image_caption]Nathan Hanson, the Polaris plant director in Roseau: “If I’m going to add a hundred people, the majority of those are going to be relocation candidates to the Roseau area, which is awesome.”[/image_caption]
Those 37 units won’t meet Roseau’s needs or the needs of Polaris, and the apartment complex isn’t the only housing initiative in the city. It is also developing 17 single-family lots and plans to develop another 19. Buyers will get a $7,500 rebate if they actually build on the plots. Peterson said Roseau is also working to relax a city code that doesn’t allow people from multiple families to live in the same house.

The cost and availability of housing have also become a top issue for state legislators. Jack Swanson, a Roseau County Commissioner, recently testified in a joint House and Senate committee on housing affordability that there are many reasons for a “severe workforce shortage in Roseau County.”

“But a lack of housing is by far and away the largest of those,” he said.

Roseau officials have plenty of ideas for how to help the city and others like it. Fabian said there’s a massive amount of state money spent on subsidized housing. But most of it is focused on affordable housing and the workforce housing fund — which Fabian helped create at the Legislature — is limited in what it can do. The most recent Roseau project practically drained the account at the time, Peterson said. And lawmakers approved just $4 million for it in the latest two-year budget.

Fabian also said he hopes the Legislature allows tax credits for companies or people who want to donate cash to a private housing project if the area can demonstrate need.

Peterson also recommended lawmakers put more into the workforce housing program. He said he hoped previously the state would relax Tax Increment Financing laws — which can help governments finance affordable housing — but that the idea was met with resistance.

For now, Peterson said cities must get creative, and publicly finance projects. Hanson, the Polaris plant director, said fixing the housing shortage would be a huge boon for the region and help other nearby companies like Marvin Windows in Warroad.

“If I can get a family to move here, everyone benefits,” Hanson said.

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

  1. We need far more of this…and affordable housing. If the private can’t/won’t do it…the govt should.

  2. Back in the day, employers located where they had access to labor. For site specific employers, like coal mines, they built company housing, know that they needed to attract labor.

    Today, what with all of the rampant socialism, employers just let Big Gubmint handle it.

    1. Public money means what? Would that be the residents of that area or is it my ‘city money’ that is footing the bill? If it is their money fine, but if they are taping my minnesota tax dollar than no.

    2. Socialism =/= ‘when the government does stuff’

      Do you instead mean the globalist market deregulation that allows capital to flow across borders but not labor, leading to capitalists focusing their investment in manufacturing on cheap-labor nations rather than here?

      That’s the ‘government doing stuff:’ negotiating trade agreements that deregulate global markets and send U.S. capital outside the country, but it’s definitely not socialism

  3. I’m waiting to hear Fischbach’s reaction to this clearly socialist action by the government of Roseau.

    1. I can’t disagree. The Workforce Housing Development Program is using metro taxes to subsidize sending jobs to small town employers so they can avoid paying a living wage. Why do we want to keep doing that?

      1. It’s social engineering. The state has expressed a preference that small towns and rural areas remain populated at some undefined level. Rather than letting the free market and individual choice determine where people live, the state has stepped in to, as it were, pick winners.

  4. Roseau’s downtown and downtown-adjacent zoning isn’t helping build needed workforce housing. These unbuilt lots just sitting there within walking distance to the plant.

  5. On a $6.8 million project, it would be nice if Polaris had kicked in more than $100,000 for housing being built specifically for their workers. It shouldn’t take tax credits for them to realize the value of that investment.

    1. The whole project is basically a government subsidy to Polaris. The problem is neatly stated in the article: median incomes in Roseau are not high enough to be able to afford a new construction single family home. Only 2700 people live in Roseau and Polaris employs 1500 people there. The simple conclusion to draw is that Polaris doesn’t pay well enough for it’s employees to be able to build a house. Government subsidized housing helps Polaris keep wages low.

      1. It’s also worth noting that the $100,000 contribution from Polaris is a small fraction of the Polaris CEO’s annual compensation… Does he live in Roseau?

      2. That is really it. I don’t mind subsidizing housing – I only pick on outstate Minnesota because of their claims of being independent and the metro-bashing. People do need help everywhere. But this is really Polaris working the system exactly how you describe.

  6. The Erie Mining company actually paid to have the whole town of Hoyt Lakes built from scratch in order to house their unionized workforce back in the 50s and it wasn’t just a couple of crappy apartments either but rather homes built for families. Polaris contributing a measly $100k to local housing during a year of record profits is ridiculous. Roseau County should build 100 new single family homes and use increased taxes levied on Polaris to pay the bill.

  7. This is not ‘breaking news.’. Polaris/Roseau has experienced this boom for some time. The onus is on the Chamber of Commerce and city ‘leaders’ who should have addressed this ‘problem’ long ago. But, when you have ultra conservatives in control you also have regressive thinking running the show.

    1. Roseau’s leaders found time to declare the city a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary. Their job was done.

  8. Here’s another great article that predicted the current economic issues pretty well a decade ago:

    https://www.mprnews.org/story/2011/04/04/aging-population

    “By the 2020s, the state’s labor force growth rate will reach record low levels. State economist Tom Stinson says that means more counties will see population declines.”

    “This is not something to be feared. It’s something to be aware of and to plan for,” Stinson said. “And the individuals, the firms, the communities that figure out how to deal with it, they’re going to be furthest along toward success in the next two decades.”

  9. ‘ Fabian also said he hopes the Legislature allows tax credits for companies or people who want to donate cash to a private housing project if the area can demonstrate need.’

    That seems like an idea fraught with potential for abuse. It would allow companies and their executives to direct their tax dollars to subsidize housing for their company. Their friends and relatives may even happen to be the developers of said subsidized private housing project.

  10. Well, obviously this is public subsidy for Polaris so we can dispense with the usual celebrations of private sector efficiency. I just have to point out that these subsidies often don’t really pay off. Just because you build it doesn’t mean they’ll come to Roseau, and while $7 million isn’t a huge amount of money, how much economic growth do you really expect from an additional 38 people? Will people really move to Roseau just to find work? And are we assuming that no one will leave Roseau in the meantime?

    On another note, I wonder what’s the deal… why can they build 38 units in Roseau for $7 million but it costs $30+ million to build 87 units in MPLS?

    1. And that is the con. A massively profitable corporation fronting a measly $100k in the hopes that the county and state pony up the additional funds needed to house their meagerly paid employees who are not paid enough to afford housing in that area.

      1. Yes, and is Polaris promising to stay, or are they going to leave anyways even if they get their 100 additional workers? Obviously losing companies like this can devastate a town or region, so we can see why they try to keep them, we just have to hope they don’t drain resources in futile attempts.

    2. “On another note, I wonder what’s the deal… why can they build 38 units in Roseau for $7 million but it costs $30+ million to build 87 units in MPLS?”

      I’m guessing that land acquisition costs are a big factor. There are probably different design requirements for the projects.

      1. Those are definitely important factors. After all, building an 87 unit building isn’t just a matter of a little more than doubling the cost of a 38 unit building. It has to either take up more land space or be able to be structurally sound over at least twice the height…or both. Right now, material costs are high and you can’t really do anything to mitigate that. According to a few articles, the average cost per square foot to build a low rise apartment complex is about $150-225, while a high rise is around $225-400 per square foot. Consider whether demolition has to be done, and the cost of the land, and it all factors into the cost.

Leave a comment