Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate
Topics
MinnPost’s education reporting is made possible by a grant from the Bush Foundation.

At MPS, data on teachers raise resource-equity questions

Would a realignment in which money more faithfully followed students, and not teachers, create incentives for wealthier schools to try to serve more challenged students? 

North High classroom
MinnPost photo by Bill Kelley
Are resources being distributed equitably, and would a realignment in which the money more faithfully followed students, and not teachers, create incentives for wealthier schools to try to serve more challenged students?

In a culture that has historically regarded every conversation about resources as a zero-sum game, the topic of equity has a tendency to be painful for the have-nots and frightening for the haves.

Nowhere is this more true than in Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS). And nowhere in the district is it more red hot than when it comes to the issue of teacher assignment and compensation.

As in every other school district in the country, state and federal funds are supposed to follow students, with extra money directed to schools that have concentrations of kids who arrive with multiple challenges.

Yet a MinnPost analysis of 2012-2013 MPS salary data shows the teachers with the highest salaries clustered in the wealthiest, whitest schools. These are the teachers with the most experience and the most advanced degrees. Meanwhile the lowest paid, least experienced are concentrated in the district’s most challenged schools.

The most common question prompted by this kind of disparity is whether the students facing the most academic challenges are getting the best teachers — the presumption being that experience equals effectiveness. Teacher evaluations now in their second year in MPS should help to answer that.

Allocation issues

But there’s another set of questions posed by the data: Are resources being distributed equitably, and would a realignment in which the money more faithfully followed students, and not teachers, create incentives for wealthier schools to try to serve more challenged students?

Among mainline programs, Lake Harriet’s lower campus boasts the highest median teacher salary, at $80,355, not including benefits. Located a few blocks from its namesake landmark, the program is a popular option with wealthy southwest Minneapolis families who compete for admission.

Some 85 percent of its K-3 students are white. Fewer than 8 percent of the school’s students qualify for free or reduced price lunch. That poverty level is so low that the school does not qualify for federal Title I funds, the main pot of money that is supposed to offset the challenges of educating poor children.

A few miles to the north, Bethune Community School has a student body that is entirely impoverished and the lowest median teacher salary in the district, at $49,449. One fourth of its K-8 students receive special education services and a third are homeless or lack stable housing.

And because 94 percent of Bethune’s students are minorities, nearly a third more than the district as a whole, it’s considered racially identifiable — the state’s legal definition of a segregated school. A little further to the north at Lucy Laney, also racially identifiable, the median teacher is slightly higher at $51,510.

The budgeting process

At budgeting time, however, the district bases individual schools’ budgets on the average district salary — this year $66,412 per teacher, plus 31 percent for benefits. Schools may use discretionary funds to “buy” additional teachers at this rate to bring down class sizes or for particular programming.

For more than a decade, parents and other stakeholders have argued that this budgeting process obscures a fundamental inequity. The formula, they note, shortchanges schools with the most poorly paid teachers and subsidizes those with better-paid faculties.

To make the chart below, a list of every MPS teacher’s actual pay was used to calculate each school’s median salary. This was juxtaposed against the schools’ poverty rates, which are closely correlated with minority population. The line across the center of the map shows the district median salary, $70,053.

MPS median salary vs. free/reduced lunch percentage

Source: MinnPost analysis of Minneapolis Public Schools data, via Chris Stewart
Schools on the left side of the chart, with the lowest proportion of students receiving free/reduced price lunch, also have some of the highest median salaries in the district. A table of the data used for the chart is available below.

The highest median salaries by building are displayed in the upper left. The schools represented by green markers are programs that do not serve enough impoverished students to qualify for federal Title I aid. Six of MPS’ seven non-Title I schools occupy this spot on the map.

On the opposite side of the chart, schools identified by orange markers are racially identifiable; they have concentrations of minority students that are 20 or more percentage points higher than district averages for their grade levels. These programs meet the state’s definition of racially identifiable, or segregated, schools.

Many of the other programs on the far right side of the chart are just as heavily minority but are not among the types of schools that have to report under the state’s desegregation laws. (Not appearing on the map at all are some specialty schools, like stand-alone special-ed programs, which have very high, uncommon costs, such as staff psychologists.)

Median teacher salaries at six of the district’s seven non-Title I schools are higher than the district median. At 10 of its 13 schools that are so segregated they meet the state’s statutory definition of racially isolated, median salary is less than the district median.

Similar results in 2007 study

A 2007 study initiated by a group of MPS parents and conducted with assistance from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Regional and Urban Affairs found similar results. Of 28 schools with above-average percentages of students of color or impoverished students, 26 had below-average teacher pay.

Among other findings, that study reported that per-pupil spending on teacher salaries from the district’s general fund, the pot of money not earmarked for specific uses, ranged from $916 to $3,859, with poorer schools getting lesser amounts.

In recent days, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights released a report on equity in American schools that found that minorities are three times as likely as white students to attend schools with concentrations of new teachers.

Add these to a mountain of research showing that teachers with seniority tend to gravitate to schools with fewer challenges. And to the common-sense proposition that teachers are most effective when they want to work in the school where they are assigned.

And while there are numerous experiments in teacher compensation reform under way around the country, teachers unions — badly battered on the political playing field over the last four years — have dug in here and elsewhere on attempts to change the role seniority plays in staffing. 

MPS administrators were busy ironing out a snafu involving next year’s estimated school budgets and unable to respond to an interview request for this story. There is, however, a major change in the works that may help address the issue of equity in resources.

The district is moving toward adopting “weighted student funding,” a system now in use in a number of large districts including Baltimore, Boston, Cincinnati, Denver, Hartford, Houston, Oakland, San Francisco and Seattle.

Although details vary by community, the system allocates funding to students based on their needs. More dollars would follow a pupil who was learning English, for instance, or who is homeless. Funds could be adjusted to support district priorities, such as early literacy.

MPS is currently in the process of setting a threshold for academic programming for all schools. Right now, the amount of math, reading and other subjects students receive fluctuate widely.

New funding system coming

Under the new funding system, expected to roll out in the 2015-2016 academic year, money would be budgeted to pay for this equitable level of programming, and schools can use the rest of their budgets to meet their unique needs.

What it doesn’t mean — at least not in the short term — is an end to the practice of allocating teacher salary lines by average salary. Nor does the future budgeting system come with new state or federal dollars for schools.

But it might entice back some of the families that have left MPS over the last decade. And it might fundamentally change the game to give schools incentives to compete for underserved students. 

Minneapolis Public School salary data

School Median salary Mean salary Free/reduced
lunch %
Category
North (ISA) 62,327 59,365 92 Racially identifiable
Pratt Elementary 73,659 70,642 75 Other
Lake Nokomis Wenonah 70,568 66,362 53 Other
Seward Montessori School 76,234 70,535 53 Other
Folwell Performing Arts 67,993 65,491 86 Other
Kenwood Elementary 77,265 75,719 28 Non-Title I
Lake Harriet Upper (Fulton) 72,113 71,701 9 Non-Title I
Armatage 69,023 65,449 28 Non-Title I
Hale Elementary 76,234 74,539 17 Non-Title I
South High 70,053 67,758 55 Other
Edison High 65,932 64,264 91 Other
Henry High 69,023 67,002 90 Racially identifiable
Nellie Stone Johnson 71,083 64,537 96 Racially identifiable
Richard Green Central 60,266 59,875 95 Racially identifiable
Bryn Mawr Primary 69,023 66,994 83 Racially identifiable
Hmong International Academy 69,023 65,005 90 Racially identifiable
Whittier Community School 63,872 62,106 67 Other
Northrop Elementary 65,932 66,030 49 Other
Emerson Spanish Immersion 61,812 56,918 79 Other
Hiawatha Elementary 75,719 75,605 55 Other
Jenny Lind 65,932 63,327 94 Racially identifiable
Lake Nokomis Keewaydin 65,932 65,353 56 Other
Sanford Middle School 69,023 69,419 63 Other
Anne Sullivan 70,568 67,755 93 Racially identifiable
Jefferson Elementary 67,993 64,584 95 Other
Anishinabe Academy 67,993 67,056 96 Other
Harrison Education Center 58,206 58,292 97 Other
Burroughs 72,629 72,314 12 Non-Title I
Bancroft Elementary 70,053 67,716 88 Other
Pillsbury Math/Science/Technology 72,113 68,520 88 Other
Northeast Middle School 63,872 62,215 81 Other
Dowling Elementary 78,296 76,633 39 Other
Anthony 65,417 64,191 39 Other
Ramsey Middle School 58,206 59,030 42 Other
Olson Middle School 52,540 54,772 93 Racially identifiable
Wellstone Intl High School 69,023 65,785 93 Other
Loring Elementary 71,598 71,298 65 Other
Sheridan International Fine Arts 67,993 65,469 94 Racially identifiable
River Bend 59,751 60,736 99 Other
Transition Plus 75,719 71,856 80 Other
North High 64,387 63,357 91 Racially identifiable
Kenny Elementary 72,113 71,034 37 Other
Bethune 49,449 56,036 100 Racially identifiable
Lake Harriet Lower (Audubon) 80,355 78,020 8 Non-Title I
Southwest High 74,174 69,721 39 Other
Field 75,204 71,868 26 Non-Title I
Barton Open 73,144 72,332 26 Non-Title I
Hall International 72,113 68,099 88 Racially identifiable
Lyndale Elementary 67,993 67,265 76 Other
Washburn High 65,417 62,484 48 Other
Lucy Laney Elementary 51,510 56,486 99 Racially identifiable
Waite Park Elementary 73,144 71,007 61 Other
Roosevelt High 67,993 66,521 86 Other
Windom Elementary 65,932 66,431 53 Other
Stadium View 73,659 72,629 93 Other
Marcy Open School 70,053 67,757 45 Other
Pierre Bottineau French Immersion 49,449 52,128 68 Other
Source: MinnPost analysis of Minneapolis Public Schools data, via Chris Stewart

Data and description of data-processing techniques available on GitHub.