Snow covered trees
Forestry experts say trees are critical infrastructure that can help cities withstand the effects of climate change by providing shade, absorbing stormwater and filtering air pollution. Credit: REUTERS/Carlos Osorio

This article was originally published by Stateline, an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Cities need to plant more trees. But not just any trees.

As communities prepare for a massive influx of federal funding to support urban forestry, their leaders say the tree canopy that grows to maturity 50 years from now will need to be painted with a different palette than the one that exists today.

“You need a tree that’s going to survive the weather of today and the climate of the future,” said Pete Smith, urban forestry program manager with the Arbor Day Foundation, a Nebraska-based nonprofit that supports tree planting and care.

Forestry experts say trees are critical infrastructure that can help cities withstand the effects of climate change by providing shade, absorbing stormwater and filtering air pollution. But to do that, the trees themselves need to be resilient.

“We’re developing planting lists that are diverse, that look at tolerance to drought, storm events and flooding, heat, changes to the highs and lows,” said Kevin Sayers, urban forestry coordinator with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. “The extremes in the weather are really going to limit us.”

While arborists look for trees that will thrive in the climate conditions they’re likely to face in the coming decades, scientists say they can’t simply count on a handful of climate “winners.” Many cities, for example, have lost vast amounts of their tree canopy because they relied too heavily on one tree type that was later wiped out by a pathogen or pest, such as Dutch elm disease or the emerald ash borer.

“Unless we start diversifying the urban forest, we’re going to end up losing quite a bit of it again,” said John Ball, South Dakota State University Extension forestry specialist and South Dakota Department of Agriculture specialist on forest health.

Ball urges cities not to plant more than 5% of any one genus of tree, but many communities have struggled to reach the diversity goals that he and other forest health experts recommend. Foresters say it takes effort to determine which trees will grow in challenging urban conditions, and nurseries often lack the less common trees they’re looking for.

Amid those challenges, cities and states are preparing to receive $1.5 billion in urban forestry funding approved by Congress earlier this year as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. Forestry leaders say that the newfound support will be transformative, but turning the money into a healthy tree canopy decades from now will be a complicated task.

“The pressure is on, but in a good way,” said Kesha Braunskill, urban forestry coordinator with the Delaware Forest Service. “This is a once-in-a-career opportunity for all of us in urban forestry, and how we use it is going to impact those who are in our positions 50 years from now.”

‘A Little More Picky’

Some cities already are making changes.

Jeremy Harold, green space manager for Harrisonburg, Virginia, said the city once took a “cookie cutter” approach to tree planting, but is now working to broaden its species mix. The city sits in the Shenandoah Valley within the Appalachian Mountain range, but it has added trees such as willow oak and sweetgum from Virginia’s coastal plain region.

“I’m putting them in our inventory now, because as temperatures rise, those trees will be adapted,” Harold said. “We’re looking for species that can tolerate those temperatures and survive.”

In Seattle, many of the city’s bigleaf maples and western red cedars are struggling in urbanized areas. Foresters are now careful to plant them in favorable microclimates, with conditions such as good soil moisture and north-facing slopes that remain cooler.

“We’re being a little more picky about where we put them on the landscape,” said Michael Yadrick Jr., plant ecologist with Seattle Parks and Recreation.

Meanwhile, the city is planting more Pacific madrone and Garry oaks that tolerate hotter, drier conditions. And within individual tree species, it’s adding trees grown from seeds taken from further south in their range, with the goal of adding resilient genotypes to the mix.

State officials in Texas operate a genetic improvement program that has produced nine “Texas Tested, Texas Tough” tree species that are adapted to handle difficult conditions, including Shumard oaks and bald cypress.

“They’ve gone through this iterative process for decades and have proven to perform in this harsh environment that is Texas urban areas,” said Gretchen Riley, Forest Systems Department head with the Texas A&M Forest Service.

The agency provides seedlings to communities and is working to offer seeds to growers who can produce their own supply. It’s also working with six other states in the region to exchange species and genetic lines and test their viability in various conditions.

Scientists at the University of Florida are working to determine which trees best withstand high winds. They’re hoping to expand an existing Florida-based classification system by looking at research from hurricane-prone communities worldwide.

“We’d like to see this list used to target wind-resistant species in areas where a tree falling over could damage property or harm people or infrastructure,” said Allyson Salisbury, a researcher at the university.

Foresters say their preparations won’t result in a complete makeover of the trees they plant. They emphasize that such decisions are an inexact science that could carry unintended consequences.

“People say we should bring species up from Southern locations,” said Lydia Scott, director of the Chicago Region Trees Initiative, a partnership of organizations and agencies dedicated to improving the area’s urban canopy. “That’s fine until we get a two-week cold snap in the winter that kills off all those trees that are not adapted to the cold.”

A Need for Seed

Above all, experts say that diversity is the best way to ensure that many trees survive the changes that are coming, rather than pinning all their hopes on guesstimates of which trees might thrive. In most communities, the existing tree canopy is far from that goal.

“Many cities are dominated by a small number of species or genera,” said Mark Ambrose, a research assistant with the North Carolina State University College of Natural Resources. Ambrose, whose position is funded by the U.S. Forest Service, has researched the makeup of the country’s existing urban tree canopy.

Elm trees once were among the most prominent trees in America’s urban forests. When Dutch elm disease wiped out many of those trees, many cities replanted with ash. Now they’re taking down millions of trees that have been ravaged by the emerald ash borer. Today, maples proliferate in cities, and foresters are casting a wary eye toward any threats to those trees.

“You could plant elm and ash anywhere on any soil and grow them,” said Ball, the South Dakota forestry specialist. “Now we’re done with the easy trees. You better know what your soils are like. You’ve got to understand the micro-environments in your community and fine-tune your plantings.”

Urban forestry leaders say they want to plant a greater diversity of trees, but getting the seedlings they need has proven to be challenging.

“Nurseries have a shortage of the species diversity we’re looking for, and that’s tough to crack because it’s the private sector,” said Keith Wood, a contractor with the National Association of State Foresters who staffs the group’s committee on urban and community forestry.

Arborists cite a feedback loop wherein nurseries grow only what sells, and cities buy only what’s available. Some have gotten around that loop by contracting with nurseries in advance to grow the seedlings they’ll need in the coming years. The Chicago Region Trees Initiative plants 54 tree species, some of which it pays for over a five-year period as nurseries grow them.

“We’re getting the species we want, the sizes we want, the numbers we want, all when we want them,” said Scott, the Chicago-area leader.

Some cities are reluctant to contract for trees years in advance, unwilling to take on inflexible cost obligations amid unpredictable budget cycles.

But nurseries need some certainty if they’re going to grow less-marketable and harder-to-cultivate species on a large scale, said Nancy Buley, communications director with J. Frank Schmidt & Son Co., a large nursery in Oregon that supplies many urban planting efforts.

“For the cities and nonprofits to get the more unusual trees to meet their species diversity goals,” she said, “they’re really going to need to contract in some way.”

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. This is a tad off topic, but the last 18 months I’ve been making frequent trips from my home in NE Mpls, to our family cabin in NW Wisconsin and From NE to a relative’s place near Grand Rapids, sometimes from the Cabin to Grand Rapids, point being I’ve been putting in a lot of miles in north central MN. It seems to me that there are a lot more pines then I remember there being in the past. I don’t know if its just me or is there a shift going on?

  2. It’s good to see that some cities are planning for the future and putting the money up to ensure they can do it right. But it’s not surprising others aren’t. Also, Texas cities have trees? Must be the ones I haven’t been to.

  3. Not news to this guy that you need trees that can stand cold, heat, drought, heavy rains and a changing environment. That is any 20 year period in Minnesota the last 2,000 years. Dutch elm disease was spread by Asian beetles, not “Global warming or cooling” or whatever the Lefties are calling it now. Emerald Ash bore was also brought in through Asia. How are they preparing for invasive species being introduced to native trees. None of this has to do with Global warming, it has to do with invasive bores and beetles.

    1. Suggesting that climate change has nothing to do with catastrophic tree loss is precisely the “head in the sand” approach that the authorities in the article are decrying. Thanks, Joe, for – once again – showing us that, in your world, ideology counts more than facts. If we were still getting week-long stretches of –40°F weather in the winter here (and I, for one, am very glad that we’re not), the Emerald Ash Borer would not be nearly the problem it has turned out to be, as they have a hard time surviving temperatures below –20°F if I remember correctly.

      That we don’t seem to be getting those kinds of “Pioneer Winters” with any regularity in recent decades would suggest to a rational person that perhaps climate change is not entirely a “lefty” propaganda point.

      1. The Asian invasion of ash bores was traced back to 2001. Dutch elm disease was first found in 1961. Hard to convince me that that is weather related. Weather patterns have shown drops and increases in below zero days in Mpls for decades, that will continue. It’s called weather, not climate change.

    2. Leave it to our favorite contrarian to take issue with planting trees. If anyone to the left of Reagan says it, it must be wrong. Does not leave much room for “reasoned compromise”.

  4. Minneapolis seems to be doing pretty well with this kind of planning. My neighborhood used to have a lot of elm; the replacements are quite varied. Plus there are tree programs for property owners to help diversify the canopy beyond boulevard trees.

  5. The article headline should be “invasion of foreign beetles, bores and funguses endanger Minnesota trees” Amazingly folks are blaming climate change on a bore that was first in Minnesota around 2001. I guess everything is climate change if you want it to be. Would there be 1.5 billion on bug control for trees?.? Bet not….

    1. Climate change, forest fires (Sorry Joe, Climate change related), hurricanes, tornadoes, Asian beetles, kids with axes, adults with chain saws, drunks with cars, there are countess reasons why trees need to be continually replaced. What to replace them with is up to the ones doing the planting. Every little thing does not need to be disagreed with…

  6. If you read the article, nowhere is there a claim that Elms or Ash trees are victims of climate change. Both are merely referenced as examples of over-planting of a single species.

    1. That’s true, but that doesn’t mean that the article doesn’t reference climate change at all. The mention of EAB (B stands for boreR, not bore, though there are plenty of those in the comments) and DED relates to needing to not only plant trees that are resilient to climate change, but to make sure that there’s diversity of species and genus so that if a genus- or species-specific disease does arise, it won’t decimate the canopy regardless of their climate hardiness. As a specific example of climate change related depletion of native tree species, the two mentioned in Seattle are clear. The big leaf maple is native to Washington state, but trees are declining due to higher temperatures and drier conditions. Thus, while they can still use big leaf maples for urban planting, they must selectively plant them where they will be more likely to experience cooler, wetter conditions than currently average. The same is true of western red cedars. Considering that the region in which Seattle is located should be covered in temperate rainforest, the fact that native rainforest trees can’t generally thrive there anymore says something. And that something isn’t good.

Leave a comment