Jeff Heegaard sat down with The Line to discuss entrepreneurship in the Twin Cities.
Photo by Bill Kelley
Jeff Heegaard sat down with The Line to discuss entrepreneurship in the Twin Cities.

Jeff Heegaard admits that his first job, at General Mills, wasn’t a good fit. After leaving what he calls “the corporate castle,” he launched a career of small-business startups and philanthropic activities, building a reputation as one of the Twin Cities’ boldest and most forward-thinking businessmen. In 2010 he joined cofounders Don Ball and Kyle Coolbroth as a partner in CoCo, the metro’s second coworking space. The Line sat down with him in CoCo’s Saint Paul digs in Lowertown to talk about what the CoCo experience has taught him about where we are and where we may be going.

The Line: Jeff, what’s happening at CoCo these days?

Jeff Heegaard: I think the bigger question is, what’s happening to create the need, the desire, for something like CoCo? There’s an emerging entrepreneurial class that has probably always been there but has been under-connected, and having a space where they can connect has created sparks that were unanticipated.

The Line: What are some of those sparks?

Jeff Heegaard: I think to answer that you have to move your focus upward to the greater economy. I mean, we are in a huge shift. There’s an emerging economy — I call it the Next Economy — that’s very different from the one I grew up in. The rules haven’t completely changed, but people are making different kinds of choices voluntarily, and they’re also being compelled to make different choices, different kinds of life decisions. And both are happening in this crossroads called CoCo. It’s a place where very cool people are colliding, and something’s happening because of it.

An Army of Entrepreneurs
I hear people call this the New Economy and say that it’s all about service industries. I don’t get that; if we become just a service-sector economy, what happens to all the people who are left behind? What do we do, park them in a corner somewhere? We’ve got to employ people, lots of people.

I want to see an army of entrepreneurs produced in the next twenty years. And not just tech entrepreneurs. It might be somebody with a hot dog stand. It could be everybody from a hot-dog stand  operator to somebody who wants to do the next Google.

This Next Economy, if it’s going to work at all, has got to take advantage of all of this technology that’s emerging. That hot-dog stand has to be the most efficient hot dog stand possible. We have to figure out a way to make that stand exceptionally efficient, and use all these tech tools to do it.

In many ways I think we need to become like new immigrants in our own country. New immigrants will try anything, do anything, to get established and support their families. They have a can-do spirit, and I think all of us need more of that. We can do it; we’re blessed with great resources everywhere, and we can do it—as much as we complain about all of the things that are going wrong, we really can be a piece of the solution as the next economy grows–locally, regionally, nationally, and globally.

Greater MSP: Pros and Cons
The Line: Especially since the economic meltdown of 2008, there’s a lot of gloom and fear about decline.

Jeff Heegaard: Sure — you listen to these oddball AM stations, and if that’s what you want to hear, that’s what you get. But where does that take us? I guess I cling to this belief that here in Minnesota we have all the resources that it takes to be incredibly successful. We’re a place of great abundance. We can’t seem to agree on what’s important, but we’re a place of great abundance.

I went to the Greater MSP event and was pleased — I was pleased to see my generation of super-CEOs step forward with a recognition that not everybody lives inside the corporate castle. There are people on the outside who live in whole different frames of reference. And Greater MSP seems to suggest that people in these two realms, inside and outside the corporate frame, better educate each other and employ each other.

But if you look at the six major objectives laid out in Greater MSP, none of them clearly articulates this need for an entrepreneurial army, a massive amount of start-up activity. Now, I don’t think government can do that, but it can help create some of the conditions for it to happen. I look at Greater MSP and get excited because it is talking about all the things I care about. But when I look at it through another lens, I think, wait a minute; they’re talking about bringing jobs in from somewhere else — and I think we’ve got to do things ourselves, make jobs here, not take them from other states.

Money Troubles and Opportunities
The Line: Of course, many of the economic obstacles we hear about are quite real, aren’t they?

Jeff Heegaard: The capital markets are focused on short-term returns and on these big massive corporations. We have super-banks, and we’ve seen what’s happened with them. And the capital is not flowing and it hasn’t flowed for quite a while. So what does the typical person do? Hunker down, try to save. Now we get less than one percent on a CD! But there are new ways of raising capital. Things like Kickstarter — I look at it and think, this is incredible! And I don’t even understand how it’s legal!

Right now, say you’re a 22-year-old with a great idea. How do you fund it? You go to your mom and dad, your uncles and cousins. But a lot of that equity has disappeared. And we’re naturally cautious about the future. We’ve convinced ourselves that we’re in a world of scarcity and forgotten that there’s great abundance around us.

In Search of Microinvestors
I think one of the only ways out of this is for everybody to understand that they are part of this Next Economy — to grasp that, instead of saying, “I can’t invest; I only have a thousand dollars.” There might be five companies here at CoCo who, if they had ten thousand dollars, would be able to get past phase one and have a discussion about phase two.

You go to a banker now, and unless you have money, you’re not going to get any money. A good history of employment and a good job won’t do it. You have to have most of the money you want in order to borrow that amount! And that just dampens risk-taking and increases fear. We need people who have some money to go out, seek opportunities, see themselves as micro-investors — as entrepreneurs themselves. And not just to do good, but because they actually might get more than one percent on their money!

We have to figure out ways to do a whole lot of things better — better food, cleaner energy, and so on. We know what we are eating, and we know it isn’t good for us, but we have a hard time deciding to eat differently. We know that this petro-economy is going to kill us, but we can’t seem to migrate from it quickly enough. And the bigger these economic machines get, the more trouble we’re in. That doesn’t mean I’m anti-corporate; we need these guys, but at the same time we need to build the Next Economy in a way that’s defined by better rules, values, and systems.

Beyond One-Dimensionality
The Line: How does CoCo fit into that search for better rules, values, and systems?

Jeff Heegaard: What intrigues me about CoCo is that we have really smart people here, and most of them aren’t one-dimensional. Some of them are building a company, and at the same time choosing a nonprofit to associate with. We have the Citizens’ League here in CoCo now; they moved in last week; they are connecting with entrepreneurs. There’s a cool biotech company that’s working on replacing red dye 40.  There are small companies helping big legacy companies over the hump so they can be efficient in the new economy. Focus to Grow is one company I love — they’re dealing with the issue of child soldiers. A little marketing-consulting company of five or six people and they’re doing that; it blows me away.

Jeff Heegaard
Photo by Bill Kelley

The Line: Coworking originally developed in Europe mainly as a platform for social entrepreneurship, but that is not the model here — we’re much more focused on products and services, yet the social-entrepreneurial element shows up.

Jeff Heegaard: Yes, And it’s not like CoCo is demanding that of anybody; it just seems to occur.

I see small companies, two and three people, begun to associate with other twos and threes, and occasionally I hear “maybe we should push these two together and become six.” One of those mergers — they’re not easy — happened just this week. There’s a lot of this going on, but it’s still at a micro-scale. We have a couple hundred members here, but what if we created a system where there was a whole lot of startups going on?

The Line: It seems like these young entrepreneurs are willing to try things — and willing to fail. 

Jeff Heegaard: It’s not that people here are willing to fail — quite the opposite. Not a single one is willing to fail! In many cases, their families are depending on them to succeed, just like the situation with new immigrants and the drive and vitality they bring. But they do seem willing to go down different avenues and try different things. It probably has a lot to do with these devices that sit on the tables — these Macs.

I don’t know how a state goes about creating an army of entrepreneurs like these, but I know it would be a very cool thing. And when I see the people who come in here, full of energy, their eyes bright, I get very optimistic. I see little green shoots coming up here, and I get a feeling of spring, of optimism about the Next Economy.

This article is reprinted in partnership with The Line, an online chronicle of Twin Cities creativity in entrepreneurship, culture, retail, placemaking, the arts, and other elements of the new creative economy. Jon Spayde is the managing editor of The Line.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. “I don’t know how a state goes about creating an army of entrepreneurs like these, but I know it would be a very cool thing”

    I can think of two ways off the top of my head: 1) Charter a state bank ala North Dakota. Run and designed properly, it would both provide loans for start-ups but a return for state coffers. 2) Institute single-payer, universal health care. Half of all bankruptcies are related to medical costs. Anecdotal evidence suggests that lack of medical coverage is a huge disincentive for middle-class potential entrepreneurs.

    I, personally, also believe that changing the tax code, so as to make multi-million dollar CEO salaries less attractive than reinvesting in the company, would go a long way towards creating the environment in which the “Next Economy” could grown.

  2. @#1 Lora, you are right on, although you actually named three ways. I couldn’t say it any better.

    Additional (from experience) note: For a small business owner, single payer would be one of the best ways government could stimulate the economy. The idea of tax cuts are such upside-down nonsense. But taking the burden of providing health insurance off of small businesses would make them so much more competitive in recruiting top talent.

    Hope Mr. Heegaard checks back to read your three points.

  3. 1) The taxpayers aren’t interested in being venture capitalists who would be on the hook for failed ventures, and private banks aren’t interested in having to compete with a bank that has unlimited assets from the taxpayer.

    2) The last time the government tried to limit CEO income via the tax code, companies adapted by giving them stock options instead, which made the CEOs even richer.

    The best thing the government could do to ensure a successful “next economy” is to get out of the way.

  4. “Anecdotal evidence suggests that lack of medical coverage is a huge disincentive for middle-class potential entrepreneurs.”

    Only because they’ve been scared by the politicians and their friends in the press. Starting out, do you think Bill Gates or Steve Jobs gave a rip about whether they had health insurance?

  5. I get very excited when I hear people like Mr. Heegaard talk about the fact that in Minnesota we have abundance versus scarcity. In fact, I believe and have written that the next economic wave will be based on the mentality of abundance versus scarcity simply because as we move into an age where information is abundant, it is also organic, meaning it is constantly morphing into new information.

    Sadly, our corporations and government bureaucrats operate with an industrial age mindset of scarcity. In an industrial economy, scarcity cause prices and profits to rise. In an information economy, the opposite happens. When information is shared and give away, it comes more valuable because it can morph into these new ideas, concepts, products and services that people want to buy.

    Good luck to you and keep putting those two and four people together. Keep building trust within those groups and you’re right, amazing things will result.

    Thanks for a great read.

  6. I think another aspect of the “new” economy, which is hundreds of years old, is the cooperative movement. I don’t think most people realize how many there are–about 30,000 in the United States. My own medical provider is a co-op although many people don’t realize that. My grocery store is a co-op, and I usually get an annual check back. Coops can take a number of forms, but they are all democratically controlled in one degree or another.
    That Americans are sick of the Wall-street financers controlling our economy and politics (one and the same) is evident from the Occupy Movement and other challenges to the authority of banksters and others. I believe it will change.
    Bill Moyers last night talked with David Stockman–remember him? the former budget director for Ronald Reagan? He has had a serious change of mind and heart and has written a book on “crony capitalism” that he says is distorting free markets and endangering democracy. “As a result,” Stockman says, “we have neither capitalism nor democracy. We have crony capitalism.”
    Gretchen Morgenstern of the NYTimes was also interviewed regarding her new book, Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon. She may be even more to the point.
    How long, Oh, Lord, how long? . . .

  7. When I saw this piece, I first thought “Gee, is MinnPost really taking an interest in business?” Then, “How did a leftist blog go about finding a businessman that was willing to speak with them?”

    Go the the google!~

    Jeff Heegaard
    Executive Director at 1000 Friends of Minnesota

    Oh…….

    Well, with that out of the way I don’t see anything Mr. Heegaard has said that I can fundamentally disagree with, but the leftist commentary that precedes my contribution suggests that his message needs focus lest his natural allies misconstrue his vision for another leftist delusion.

  8. @#7 “natural allies”

    Thomas, I believe you’d find interesting that not all businesspeople walk lock-step with a conservative view of our economy and society.

    Yes, most Chambers of Commerce are essentially pushing austerity and other rightist memes, but they comprise only a portion of the businesses out there. Many businesses don’t join a Chamber because they don’t want to support their regressive policies. But rather are interested in building their local communities and businesses in a way that is sustainable long term.

    These businesspeople are already forming alternates to the Chambers. Just a couple links for you to start, there are many more:

    http://www.smallbusinessmn.org/
    http://www.asbcouncil.org/

    Maybe I took your natural allies implication incorrectly because Mr. Heegaards Next Economy and CoCo would find much agreement and support within these business organizations.

  9. @#7: Tom, your information is out of date. 1000 Friends of Minnesota has renamed itself “Envision Minnesota” and its Executive Director is Sally Wakefield.

    http://www.envisionmn.org/about-staff/

    That was all news to me too.

    Would you care to explain how you think Mr. Heegaard’s natural allies might misconstrue his message as “another leftist delusion”?

Leave a comment