Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Driving in Minnesota winters is hard — even for driverless vehicles

MinnPost photo by Greta Kaul
As autonomous vehicle technology moves from the realm of the Jetsons to become an inevitability Minnesota transportation officials are keen to test it out.

On Tuesday, Minnesota Department of Transportation officials showed off an autonomous shuttle bus they’re test driving at their facility near Albertville, northwest of the Twin Cities. They’ve affectionately nicknamed the vehicle, “Minnie,” an homage to Minnesota — and also to the bus’ stunted stature.

“Autonomous Vehicle Testing Area 15 mph,” a roadside sign told drivers of ordinary cars, as Minnie trundled passengers along, stopping at intersections, braking when pedestrians crossed its path and sometimes coming to a halt for no apparent reason at all.

“It was probably snow blowing across the road,” one of the demonstrators said.

Winter driving in Minnesota presents some challenges for the technology underpinning autonomous vehicles, much of it being developed by companies in temperate Silicon Valley, and tested in sunnier climes.

As autonomous vehicle technology moves from the realm of the Jetsons to become an inevitability, Minnesota transportation officials are keen to test it out. It’s important, they say, that conditions like snow, salt-caked cars and black ice are considered by both manufacturers and policymakers as cars start to drive themselves.

The bus MnDOT is testing, manufactured by French company EasyMile, has never been tried in Minnesota-like weather conditions, said Janelle Borgen, who works for WSB & Associates, a Minneapolis company MnDOT is working with to test the bus. In the coming months, MnDOT will put the shuttle through the paces of Minnesota driving conditions like snow-covered roads, blowing snow, ice and salt spray, sending a continuous stream of data back to EasyMile to help the company tweak its algorithms.

“One of the reasons we do this is because … as the state of Minnesota, we don’t want Florida, California, Arizona, Nevada telling the feds this is how it should be because here, it’s completely different,” said Michael Kronzer, a project manager for MnDOT’s Autonomous Shuttle Bus Pilot Project.

How autonomous vehicles ‘see’

Without human eyes and ears at the steering wheel, autonomous vehicles rely on a combination of sensors and data to know where they are on the road — and what they’re sharing it with.

“Each system is a little different, but generally speaking, it’s a combination of LIDAR [light sensors] and cameras, and then a whole series of backup sensors that can do everything from detecting audio to trying to detect odors,” said Laura Fraade-Blanar, a postdoctoral fellow at RAND Corporation, a nonpartisan research organization.

To give the autonomous vehicles a model of the world in which they are operating, companies are developing maps that chart three dimensions of streetscapes. With the help of GPS, vehicles can plot their location within millimeters in these high-fidelity, 3D-mapped worlds.

Janelle Borgen
MinnPost photo by Greta Kaul
Janelle Borgen: “Our job is to test the limits and evolve the technology and understand how it works in our conditions.”

For now, Minnie isn’t operating in a 3D model of the world in quite the same way engineers envision driverless cars of the future will. Instead, testers pre-set a route and the shuttle uses GPS to finds its way.

Another bit of technology companies are outfitting autonomous vehicles with is LIDAR (which stands for light detection and ranging). It’s like radar, using pulses to measure ranges, but with lasers.

“Being an infrared laser, it doesn’t need any other ambient light to work. It’s illuminating the target around it with its own light, so it works in total darkness or sunlight,” said Greg McGuire, the director of the Mcity lab, an autonomous technology testing facility at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

And then there’s cameras, which help cars see — and stay within — lines on the road.

The challenges of winter

That’s all well and good, until those lines are covered in a thick layer of snow. Winter driving conditions present unique challenges for autonomous vehicles — challenges that car companies and startups are working to solve, McGuire said.

There’s the problem of road salt. As any Minnesota driver knows, cars driven in winter conditions get crusty with salt and grime from the roads. This can block the sensors and cameras that help autonomous cars drive. 3M, which is working with MnDOT on the shuttle project, is helping to develop films that protect the sensors.

There’s also falling snow. LIDAR is a very sophisticated form of technology, but it can be foiled by precipitation. “Things that are reflective to infrared laser light will bounce the signal back,” McGuire said, denoting an obstacle. “Snow is a good reflector, it (reflects) almost all the light that strikes it, infrared or not, so it’s a very good reflector of LIDAR.”

The trick is redundancy, said MnDOT state traffic engineer Jay Hietpas — these vehicles have backup sensors so if one type of technology is struggling to handle road conditions, another can pick up the slack.

For the snow problem, there are other sensors car manufacturers can use: sonar, which uses sound, and radar, which works on radio waves, that have no trouble in the snow, McGuire said.

To his knowledge, McGuire said there isn’t really technology that can pick up on black ice yet, but that could be something current technology could detect with tweaks that teach it to read the different profile of signals bouncing back off of ice.

Especially critical in harsh weather conditions will be cars’ ability to communicate with one another, and the infrastructure itself, McGuire said: If there’s a slowdown a half-mile up the road due to bad weather conditions, inter-car communication through a wifi-like technology can help alert cars coming up on the traffic.

“Vehicles would broadcast their position … every 300 milliseconds. Cars around them could hear that and understand, they know where they are so they could work out if there were any potentially colliding paths,” he said.

And what about snow on the road? How will autonomous cars see the white and yellow lines on the road when they’re covered in snow?

Between the GPS, the sensors, the inter-car communication and the cameras, automated cars should be able to handle whatever comes their way, McGuire said — even snow.

“These are just engineering problems. There are always solutions to them,” he said. “A lot of the work that we do in Mcity goes beyond the engineering problems, and thinks about much more difficult things like social questions — the impact these questions would have on our society, the legal liability requirements, those sorts of things.”

Coming soon

The technology should have some time to catch up. The first stage of autonomous driving won’t likely be completely driverless.  Often bandied about is a scenario where cars are level 4 — “highly autonomous” — under many conditions between 2019 and 2021, depending on the manufacturer, Fraade-Blanar said.

The trick is teaching the cars to know when they’re out of their element, so to speak, at which point a human needs to take over.

At MnDOT’s testing facility, a snow-covered roadway hasn’t been too much of a problem for the shuttle bus. But a foot of snow? They don’t know yet, Hietpas said. Same with black ice and salt.

“Our job is to test the limits and evolve the technology and understand how it works in our conditions,” Borgen said as she rode along aboard Minnie on a trip across the Albertville test facility site.

The public will have the opportunity to check out the shuttle bus on Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis in early February, during some of the events surrounding the Super Bowl.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Cotty Lowry on 12/21/2017 - 01:05 pm.

    Slip Slidin’ Away

    My 2015 Tesla with autopilot 1.0, which is in autonomous driving infancy, took us most of the way to Grand Rapids (MN) last week. It works great when the center line and white right hand line are very to mostly visible — snow on the road, covering those lines confuses it. I must say when we started into a few curves and I wasn’t sure about the icy conditions ahead, I clutched and stood by to immediately steer. Actually, it worked great and I suppose as the tech. matures I’ll trust it more.

    One thing for sure, it’s a wonderful way to travel, staying attentive, but much more relaxed then steering — no stress in the arms or shoulders. I entered as a skeptic but very quickly was converted to being a strong believer in its ability to make driving easier and more relaxing/fun. This is an exciting time with huge changes around the next curve!

    • Submitted by Neal Rovick on 12/21/2017 - 01:33 pm.

      And given how much people like to do other things than drive (like read and text) it is highly unlikely that they will be sitting ready to take over without them making the situation worse.

      • Submitted by Miriam Segall on 12/21/2017 - 08:13 pm.

        Autonomous vehicles

        That’s why I think the approach of putting “semi-autonomous” cars on the road is a lousy one. People aren’t paying attention even when they are supposed to be doing the driving, and we don’t even know how much the “safety” features in newer cars contribute to the problem even though those cars are far from even “semi-autonomous”. Expecting somebody in a car with a cell phone and an “infotainment” system to be paying attention when the car is supposed to be driving itself flies in the face of everything we know about how drivers behave when they know they’re supposed to be driving. And by the time (and if) the “semi-autonomus” car warns the human “driver” that they’d better take over, the “driver” won’t be able to re-focus their attention, take in the situation, decide on the necessary action, and do whatever is needed in time to avoid whatever it is that the “semi-autonomous” car can’t handle.

  2. Submitted by jim hughes on 12/21/2017 - 02:18 pm.

    cost going up

    What these tests are doing is identifying all the additional technology, both hardware and software, that would be required to actually make an autonomous vehicle work reliably in this climate. And that additional technology will cost money and take time to develop, and enhanced sensor systems would add to the cost of every car.

    Will the auto manufacturers be willing and able to make this investment and solve these problems – or will they cop out and produce vehicles that really only work in some parts of the country?

  3. Submitted by John DeWitt on 12/21/2017 - 09:54 pm.

    Look to the airlines

    I have to seriously question the feasibility of anything short of level 5, the completely autonomous vehicle. We can look at some of the issues the airlines are facing as today’s planes can essentially fly autonomously from takeoff to touchdown. A few years ago, an airliner on autopilot flew into a seawall at SFO with four experienced pilots in the cockpit. How can we expect the driver of an autonomous car to be paying enough attention to effectively take control when needed if highly trained pilots can’t? Many of today’s drivers are barely paying attention. I doubt they will suddenly start paying attention in levels 1 – 4 of the autonomous car?

    The second concern is experience. It’s quite likely that someone driving say a level 4 autonomous vehicle will go many months without actually driving. Without any meaningful driving experience, will they be capable of responding with any competence when they suddenly need to take over? When an Air France flight plummeted into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009, lack of experience in emergency situations by one of the co-pilots was suspected as a contributing factor.

    The dependence on GPS systems is also worrisome. GPS systems at the Newark airport quit working when truckers on a nearby highway were jamming GPS signals so they couldn’t be tracked. Navy ships in the Black Sea reported that their GPS systems showed them to be 30 miles from their actual positions. Spoofing by the Russians was suspected. And finally, Uber drivers in one foreign city were using hacked GPS systems to boost fares. Lot’s of work needed here.

  4. Submitted by Jon Kingstad on 12/22/2017 - 09:37 am.

    Nice idea in theory

    It’s an appealing idea to have driverless automobiles. The only way I could see driverless automobiles become safe way of traveling might be if every other single vehicle on the road were equipped in the same way at the 5.0 level as the above comments were describing. That would eliminate the flawed human factor. I’m reminded of the history of the automobile in the US. It was in the 1890’s I think and there were only two automobiles in the state of Ohio. They ended up in a collision.

Leave a Reply