Reps. Angie Craig and Dean Phillips have separately introduced their own bills aimed at shoring up local police departments.
A Minneapolis police officer shown talking with demonstrators in front of the 4th Precinct in North Minneapolis during a protest in response of the shooting death of Jamar Clark in 2015. Credit: REUTERS/Craig Lassig

WASHINGTON – As the GOP makes crime an election year issue, moderate Democrats like Rep. Angie Craig, running in tough races, are desperate for the U.S. House to approve legislation that would provide more money for police.

These Democrats, which include Rep. Dean Phillips, D-3rd, are eager for a victory they can tout in weeks leading up to November’s election. Yet Craig, D-2nd,  Phillips and fellow Democrats who are pressing for more federal help for local police have been thwarted by members of their own party. The policing legislation was supposed to move in July, coupled with a bill that would ban assault weapons in an effort to broaden Democratic support.

But Democratic leaders had to pull the package from consideration because of objections from the progressive wing of the party and members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Progressives, including Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-5th, have strenuously objected to providing more federal money for police instead of programs aimed at helping the poor. And members of the Congressional Black Caucus refuse to support doling out more cash for policing programs without any kind of new accountability standards.

Negotiations on a compromise continued during Congress’ August break. But it’s not clear any progress has been made.

The policing package includes a bill that would increase funding for the federal Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grant program. Another bill called the Invest to Protect Act, co-sponsored by Craig, would allow more flexible use of this money and establish a new grant program for police forces with fewer than 200 law enforcement officers.

Rep. Angie Craig
[image_caption]Rep. Angie Craig[/image_caption]
“My many conversations with members of local law enforcement across the Second District have made it clear that our law enforcement agencies are facing unprecedented challenges and obstacles,” Craig said. “Congress needs to step up to meet the urgency of this moment and give law enforcement the resources they need to address these critical challenges. Passing bipartisan, commonsense police bills, like my Invest to Protect Act, offers us an important opportunity to do just that.”

Not all bills in the package would increase federal funding to police. One would provide new funds to hire, employ, train, and dispatch mental health professionals to respond to 911 calls or those to any other emergency hotline prompted by someone in a mental health crisis, instead of dispatching a police officer to that emergency. Another aims to help victims of violent crimes in poor neighborhoods who may be more prone to break the law themselves.

Craig and Phillips have also separately introduced their own bills aimed at shoring up local police departments.

Craig has recently introduced the Protect and Serve Act, which would increase federal penalties for anyone who targets law enforcement officers and purposely harms them and a non-binding resolution that would urge every newly elected member the House to attend at least one ride-along with local police within the first year of taking office.

Meanwhile, Phillips, who also co-sponsored some of the legislation in the policing package, is asking House leaders to include his Pathways to Policing Act in the package.

Rep. Dean Phillips
[image_caption]Rep. Dean Phillips[/image_caption]
Phillips’ bill would provide $50 million in Justice Department grants that would help state and local law enforcement agencies recruit new officers through a national marketing campaign modeled after the one the Defense Department uses to recruit soldier, sailors and airmen. It would provide another $50 million to police departments that establish Minnesota-styled “Pathway to Policing” programs that provide financial assistance to potential police recruits and local recruiting efforts.

“I meet with chiefs of police and participate in ride-alongs with rank and file officers from our community regularly, and the number one concern I hear about is their inability to recruit and retain the best and the brightest to protect and serve our communities,” Phillips said.

 Politicizing crime

After years of decline, crime rose during the COVID-19 pandemic, partic­u­larly viol­ent crime. The trend was seen nationwide as well as in Minnesota, where violent crime rose by 21.6 %in 2021, according to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.

Republicans say efforts to “defund” and demoralize the police after the murder of George Floyd two years ago are to blame, as are criminal justice reforms implemented by Democrats in certain cities and states.

And Democrats who want to make clear they are not “soft on crime” are under attack.

For instance, Tyler Kistner, the Republican running against Craig, said his Democratic opponent’s support of the police is “shameless election year pandering.”

Kistner has also slammed Craig’s vote for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a series of reforms that included limits to qualified immunity, which protects police officers from civil lawsuits that could arise from actions in the line of duty.

Opposition from police unions to this part of the George Floyd bill stalled the legislation in the Senate, so the reforms, which would increase accountability for law enforcement misconduct and establish best practices and training requirements, have never become law.

Craig said her thinking about qualified immunity has “evolved,” because she said attacks on law enforcement have hurt recruitment and retention. So she believes qualified immunity must remain in place.

In any case, criminologists, who are struggling to determine why violent crime rates have skyrocketed, say Democratic policies are not likely to blame because the property crime rate and rates of other crimes have dropped – in Minnesota and across the nation.

“It is far too soon to say with certainty why crime rose over the last two years,” said Ames Grawert of the Brennan Center for Justice.

Grawert also noted that violent crime rose by nearly equal rates in urban, suburban and rural areas and said “despite politi­cized claims that this rise was the result of crim­inal justice reform in liberal-lean­ing juris­dic­tions, murders rose roughly equally in cities run by Repub­lic­ans and cities run by Demo­crats.”

Some experts do say falling arrest rates for murder, which may be attributable to understaffed and/or less aggressive police forces, might have emboldened those who are prone to violence.

So, saying the federal government must help local police with lagging recruitment and poor retention rates, House leaders hope an end to the stalemate over the policing bills can occur before Congress’s month-long recess in October.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said the package would be considered for a vote “whenever work is completed in readying bills for the floor.”

For Democrats like Craig and Phillips, that could not come too soon.

Join the Conversation

29 Comments

  1. For starters, there is a shortage of mental health responders. Thinking some responders are going to step in and be able to do all cops do is magical thinking. Yes they have a role and in some lower level cases can take people to the hospital or hand our resources. Also you need experienced responders.
    And in some cases, you need police and social workers/mental health responders. Mental health responders also frequently face this dilemma–services are voluntary and in the case of someone being a harm to self or others, they may refuse to go to the hospital and again that is where team work with social services, EMS and officers comes into play. Politicians like to think you can just fund the idea that cities will defer calls to mental health or a social worker, it is not that easy. Perhaps Ms. Omar and some others, can do ride alongs with cops and social services to gather a better understanding of the dynamics and issues.

  2. Is Ilhan Omar even aware of the situation in her West Bank neighborhood, where Somali kids are dying from fentanyl overdoses and the police say there’s insufficient manpower to catch the drug dealers?

    1. “the police say there’s insufficient manpower”

      MPD has open positions already. Adding federal funding will fill those roles how?

      And while crime is a problem in the West Bank & elsewhere in MN-5, is the ROI on funding police higher than for other programs?

      Another thought; it’s weird how conservatives tend to be critical of spending on schools, for exaple; the opposite seems to be the case for police. Shouldn’t we treat both the same? As in: what will we get for our money?

    2. It would be abundantly less expensive, less punitive, and more effective at reducing fatal overdoses if the State or the City were to provide no-cost fentanyl test kits to anyone who requested them, so people are not consuming drugs that contain something they did not expect to be there when they purchased it. More policing may get a few disreputable dealers off the street, but what about the next batch? Or it may result in the arrest of a dealer who does actually perform quality control of their product, which could force some buyers to go to a less reputable dealer and buy contaminated product.

      Policing was never the right response to drug use, and it still isn’t today.

  3. Omar has objected to providing more federal money for police instead of programs aimed at helping the poor … yet it’s the poor Black families in her district who are the greatest victims of crime.

    1. Well DT, we don’t often, but here we agree, seems Omar has no problem with 60-70-80 +/- or so dead folk from street gun murders every year, in exchange for what? Guess her exchange rate is 80 dead folks +/- no problem, as long as she gets 1 ultra progressive political point, good trade for her and her ultra lefty progressive constituents. Guess she and her constituents don’t recognize, or care, those dead folks, typically low income minorities!

  4. Oh come on! There are 200+ Republicans in the house, all of whom have spent years milking ‘defend the police’ for all its worth, but its the 7 progressives holding up this police funding.

    Got it, sure.

  5. Why can’t this move away from either/or to but/and? What will the Federation of Police commit to in order to attract and retain non-racist rank and file cops? I read some awful things written by Federation members after George Floyd’s murder at the hands of Minneapolis police! I mean awful! What would be so offensive about getting a commitment from leadership to nurture a culture of non-violence and non-racism and to train young cops that committing crimes will get them stiff prison sentences? Qualified immunity should never have entered the realm of community policing. Of course we need mental health professionals to respond to mental health crises! Phillips and Omar are both correct…there is more crime today than 3 years ago AND police departments must step up and be willing to change not only contract language but behavior.

  6. Ms Craig and Mr Phillips are running against Republicans, aren’t they? I say schedule a vote, let it get defeated because the GOP voted uniformly against it, and print a mailer.

  7. While we could use more police and a reformed police dept, Omar is correct in the need for more aid for the poor. Stats show over and over again, that it is poverty that is the enabler of crime, but I don’t believe repubs care. They seem to like their more guns, more police and more jails.

    1. Curious, so you appear to be saying, its poor people, car jacking, reckless driving, spinning doughnuts in intersections, killing other folks, drive by shootings, robberies, etc. etc. etc. with home made machine guns for grocery and rent money?

    2. MPD is understaffed & trying to hire. Lack of a budget is not the issue. But conservatives, unusually, seem to think throwing money at the problem anyway will solve it.

  8. It’s all of a sudden a big deal for Craig now. Why not last year? Internal polling got her worried?

  9. History can be a powerful tool. One needs only to look at the massive 1994 crime bill that Clinton pushed into law. It covered most of the bases than have been proposed today and then some. It was not an either/or question to Clinton.

    The DFL has not condemned violence for starters (wrote all DFL leaders last December with no response) and the world is shifting when one looks at Omar’s primary. On the other hand, the Republicans have promoted their limited proposals, too.

    As Ernie Larsen used to say: If nothing changes, then nothing changes.

  10. Reps. Craig and Phillips are lucky to have MinnPost choosing the subjects for their articles. The conflict of interest issues they have regarding their investments would seem to be a bigger issue, but nothing will appear on these pages…

      1. I again stand corrected. MinnPost has not devoted a whole article about the subject, but includes it a summary of many events.

      1. Thank you for making other readers aware of this travesty. I have no narrative however. I do find a certain amount of amusement that the players involved in the situation are all Minnesota Democrats, but given the large number of them, it is likely that they have a higher percentage of being involved, especially given the great wealth that they all possess.

  11. This is a really disappointing piece of journalism that is clearly an advocacy piece for Phillips and Craig. The idea that dumping more funding into a militarized police regime that triggered nationwide riots is some kind of “moderate” solution to some kind of problem is beyond unbalanced, as it the assumption that crime is more important than poverty, or that the two are separate issues.

    Devoting an entire to article to Craig and Phillip’s perspective (neither of which represent high crime inner city districts with large non-white populations) while characterizing the Congressional Black Caucus and Omar as spoilers rather than legitimate voices; represents a skewed perspective. Likewise, the underlying assumption that “moderates” who struggle to defeat and have lost elections to extremist Republicans have a better political insight regarding voter motivation and priorities is a specious assumption.

    I guess old habits, i.e. the marginalization of liberal or progressive voices are hard to break.

    1. Gee Paul, since you don’t live inner city (not in a high crime area) why is your advocacy somehow more important or accurate than theirs? Omar does not live in a high crime area here in the city, (Don Samuels does), last we heard she was in a pretty upscale area of her district, could just as well live in Eden Prairie. So how valuable is her opinion?

      1. “So how valuable is her opinion?”

        As the elected Representative of this district, her opinion is rather important. In that role, it is her job to represent the interests of the whole district; not just those in one area.

      2. Dennis, I think you have my comment confused with someone else’s. I didn’t say anything about where anyone lives, I simply noted what districts these elected officials represent. I don’t know where Don Samuels lives, but he represents no one, so I’m not sure why you even mention him. Neither the article nor my comment have anything to do with MY advocacy or opinion being more important than anyone else’s so that’s another swing and a miss. I’m not big on sports analogies but you seem to have struck out here with three swing-n-misses.

        My comment simply notes the ongoing practice of marginalizing liberals and progressive as if they’re simply obstructionist who keep “moderates” from getting their way. Since Omar holds the exact same election certificate as Phillips and Craig, and since she won HER seat by a far far far greater margin than either Craig or Phillips, I think she’s earned the right to be considered a legitimate voice rather than a mere “spoiler” of some kind. The assumption that less popular and marginal victors are somehow endowed with superior political instincts is not only irrational, but fundamentally imbalanced from a journalistic perspective. Now I don’t complain about bias as a general rule, but Minnpost writers frequently claim to hail from the old “objective” standards, so it’s disappointing to see pieces like this catering to status quo “moderation” rather than pursuing legitimate equity.

        I’m not the boss of anyone around here and I certainly won’t claim to have any editorial expertise, but I would remind Minnpost (especially in the midst of a membership drive) that this ongoing to thinly veiled hostility to a popular politician (Omar is far far far more popular in her district than either Phillips or Craig in theirs) may not be a smart policy. I would imagine Omar’s district contains a LOT of Minnpost readers, and while some of them are certainly hostile to Omar, the rest of us may be finding these ongoing jabs at Omar (not to mention the ENTIRE Black Caucus) more than a little tedious and discouraging.

    2. No eating your own sir! Rep. Phillips himself screamed at Republican Representatives that “They caused this” as he ran for safety on January 6th. None have been prosecuted or reprimanded but that isn’t the point. We must stand besides those who, though ineffective, still serve us and fail to adequately represent us in Congress.

Leave a comment