Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka

Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan[/image_credit][image_caption]On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka posted on Twitter that while the GOP supports measures to ban chokeholds and implement de-escalation training, the party “won’t support any DFL ‘reforms’ that defund or dismantle the police.”[/image_caption]
As Minnesota lawmakers negotiate police reform measures in the wake of a Minneapolis officer killing George Floyd last month, one controversial subject has come up time and again — defunding the police. 

For weeks, the GOP has warned it won’t pass any bills that would abolish, defund or diminish police departments because they say it would lead to more violence. 

But while a majority of the Minneapolis council has pledged to dismantle their police department and create a new public safety system to replace it, DFLers at the Legislature argue it’s not something they’ve ever asked for at the Capitol.

Nevertheless, the topic has risen to the forefront of public debate as lawmakers prepare for a second special session expected to begin on Monday. And it comes as Republicans seek to make defunding police a campaign issue across the country.

How ‘defund’ became a legislative issue

After police killed Floyd, Democrats, who hold a House majority, responded by proposing more than a dozen measures to change policing and criminal justice law in the state.

Their package of legislation includes a prohibition on chokeholds, neck restraints and “warrior”-style officer training. The measures would also adjust an arbitration system that allows police to contest or overturn discipline or firings. Democrats also proposed giving the Attorney General, not county attorneys, the primary authority to charge officers who kill people, and ending cash bail for most people charged with misdemeanors.

Republicans, who control the state Senate, have pushed for a more narrow set of legislation. Their proposals include a ban on chokeholds, a requirement for police to intervene when they see another officer using excessive force, mental health and autism training for law enforcement and a provision to add two citizen members to the 15-person Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, the state’s police licensing board, which is composed mainly of people from law enforcement.

At the end of a nine-day June special session, House and Senate leaders failed to reach a deal even though each side made some concessions. In one letter to House Democrats, the GOP outlined its main sticking points. The party would not support restoring voting rights for felons who are out of prison but still under supervision, nor would they accept transferring authority to the AG to prosecute all police-involved deaths.

But the GOP offer sheet also had a third objection: Opposition to “anything that defunds or dismantles a police force.”

State Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen
[image_caption]State Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen[/image_caption]
It’s a line Republicans have stuck with. On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-East Gull Lake, posted on Twitter that while the GOP supports measures to ban chokeholds and implement de-escalation training, the party “won’t support any DFL ‘reforms’ that defund or dismantle the police.”

At a hearing Wednesday, Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria, said efforts to disband police are leading to “little kids being shot” in Minneapolis. And in an interview Thursday, Sen. Warren Limmer, a Maple Grove Republican who chairs the Senate’s Judiciary and Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee, said his party is “absolutely dedicated to not defunding or dismantling law enforcement anywhere in the state of Minnesota.”

Opposition to dismantling police has become a GOP campaign theme in Minnesota and around the country. The Trump campaign released an ad last week tying Joe Biden to the defund movement. (Biden has opposed efforts to disband or defund police.)

Legislative Democrats characterize the attacks as a distraction from their actual plans. None of their bills are intended to dismantle or abolish police, party leaders say. The DFL measures even call for new state money for law enforcement training.

“It’s not based on truth, it’s just sensationalist,” said Rep. Carlos Mariani, a St. Paul DFLer who chairs the House Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.

Do DFLers want to defund police?

It’s true that no measure proposed by Democrats is explicitly meant to defund or abolish police, at least in the way many activists envision. 

State Rep. Carlos Mariani
[image_caption]State Rep. Carlos Mariani[/image_caption]
Some of those same activists have even criticized DFL state lawmakers because they believe the House measures don’t go far enough to restrict or alter law enforcement. Arianna Nason, an organizer with MPD150, a group that has advocated for a police-free Minneapolis, said the DFL plans are simply a “reform bill” that is based not on “what do we need,” but “what can we win right now.”

Republicans, however, have stood by accusations that legislative DFLers want to defund police. Gazelka pointed to one measure supported by Democrats that would spend $15 million to create an Office of Community-Led Public Safety Coordination that by law would “promote and monitor alternatives to traditional policing models.” (Mariani said that office would focus on “community-based intervention,” such as social workers who could respond alongside police, or reliance on other groups like MAD DADS to help intervene in local communities in an effort to prevent crime.)

Limmer said the way DFL lawmakers talk about policing makes it seem as if they want to “weaken the authority of police officers.” And he said support for defunding the police within the party makes lawmakers guilty by association. “If they keep saying it, even on local levels, they have to own it,” Limmer said.

During the June special session, House Republicans tried to get Democrats to vote on legislation that would ban cities from dismantling police. But DFLers largely said it was up to cities to decide that question for themselves. 

On Wednesday, Mariani said local officials and communities can choose how best to deliver public safety services and said small towns sometimes disband police departments in order to rely on county governments or other officials for policing.

Still, Mariani said defunding police is not something he supports. “It’s just bad politics,” he said. The idea is vague, he said, in that most people don’t quite understand what it really means, and it will cause some people to react with fear of what society would be like without cops. 

It also takes focus away from the issue of cops killing Black people, he said. “You throw out a concept like ‘defund’ and no one knows what the hell that means, and we’ve lost the conversation that should make a difference in the lives of Black men and women,” he said.

Progress toward a deal?

While the parties have continued to trade public barbs — Democrats accuse the GOP of ignoring lawmakers of color while trying to shift attention away from their proposals and toward the abolition movement and the toppling of statues — legislators have been meeting in private to try to hash out a compromise.

Limmer said most Republicans now support banning “warrior”-style training after more research on exactly what it entails. Critics say the courses make officers aggressive, paranoid and, some research suggests, more favorable toward excessive force. Defenders say it helps officers ward off attacks in the line of duty. There is also common political ground between House Democrats and Senate Republicans over changing the arbitration system.

State Sen. Warren Limmer
[image_caption]State Sen. Warren Limmer[/image_caption]
Mariani said DFLers are open to compromise but need to pass at least one measure aimed at “big systems-changing work.” That could include a measure to give the POST Board more power to strip officer licenses, a measure to create powerful citizen oversight councils to watchdog police departments that employ 50 or more officers, or the proposal to create a new officer of “community-centered public safety work” that provides alternatives to traditional policing. Limmer said he is wary of plans he believes shift responsibility for police oversight from local officials, like city councils, to the state.

Gazelka and Gov. Tim Walz told reporters this week they are optimistic a deal can be reached. But obstacles remain. Democratic lawmakers from the People of Color and Indigenous Caucus held a press conference this week saying they were hesitant to compromise. And Limmer said he’d prefer to continue talks over the next five months on the complicated topic before returning for the 2021 regular legislative session. (That would come after the 2020 election determining control of the state House and Senate.)

Mariani said he hopes lawmakers strike an agreement soon. “The longer it goes without us doing that, the harder it’s going to get,” he said. “We’re obviously going to keep pounding on each other. You guys are pounding us on this defund issue … and we keep pounding on you for just not responding. And at some point, people’s feelings get bent out of shape and it makes it harder for us to talk.”

MinnPost Washington correspondent Gabe Schneider contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. The Republicans are talking about it because the clueless, out-of-touch Minneapolis council has handed them a campaign issue. Its a lifeline to a party that is sinking from Trump’s incompetence.

  2. It’s called “Gining up the base” It’s a common political trick, designed to publicize a ridiculous opposition “posiition”–usually false–to give one party a leg up on PR

  3. Gazelka’s Repubs are doing it because lying about what state DFLers are actually proposing is the best political gambit Repubs have to justify their endemic Do-Nothingism and perpetual paralysis. They can claim they “stood up” to some lib’rul outrage, an “outrage” that was (of course) never proposed by the DFL House.

    Exactly like Trumpolini’s ongoing “You’ll Die, Die, Die in Joe Biden’s America!” TV ads, which similarly lie about Biden’s position on police reform and seek to generate fear as well. Today’s Repub party is a party of lies, by liars, for liars–to paraphrase Lincoln. Of course, if Honest Abe were to watch the deceitful antics of “his” party today, he’d puke.

  4. I’d like to slap in the face the police-reform activist who coined the phrase “defund the police” — what a poor choice of words, giving a priceless gift to the other side.

    Anything would be better: reform the police, re-form the police, restructure the police, reconstruct the police, remake the police, re-envision the police, rebuild the police, etc.

    1. The Left needs a Frank Luntz of it’s own. He’s the genius who gave us the term “death tax” for the estate tax. I’m sure when he heard “defund the police”, I’m hope for his sake he was sitting down, else he’d fall over at hearing such stupidity.

      It’s like an attorney telling the jury, “My client hasn’t beat his wife in many years now.”

  5. This is where main stream journalism becomes lame stream journalism.
    They allow themselves to get played by conservatives all the time like this. It just wouldn’t be “objective” to call a spade a spade, now would it. If the GOP tells us the sky is yellow, they put themselves in a straight jacket to maintain their coveted “objectivity”.

    Just look at how they report on all the chum Don Trump spews out. Trump tweets non-sense like “I’ll defund the schools”. Then we get serious articles on “Will Trump Follow Through?” and “Can Trump Defund the Schools?” We all know he can’t, but the lame stream media takes the bait and gets played by conservatives every time. They learned nothing from 2016 and how conservatives take advantage of their straight reporting time after time.

    Can MinnPost up it’s game? Heck, it’s an election year. We don’t need more both-sidesism.

  6. It’s the state-level Quemoy and Matsu, updated for the 21st Century. The pearl-clutching of Republicans over an issue over which they have little, if any, control is just designed to rile up the base.

    It is yet another example of how Republicans fail at governance. They are good at getting their supporters worked up, but when it comes to concrete proposals and actually doing something about problems, they have nothing.

  7. Always amazing when a party that has run the city of Minneapolis for 5 decades makes the claim they can fix the problems. If the Democratic Party was capable of fixing the police, poor preforming public schools and systemic racism in Minneapolis, one might think they would have done it in the past 50 years.
    The reason “defund the Police “ is an issue is Ilhan Omar wants it and the all Democratic Mpls city council voted to defund the police.

    1. I’m not sure you know about the history of the Mpls PD, but it makes interesting reading and might help you to understand that it is not a problem that Democrats in particular have caused.

      I personally know a guy who got rowdy at a Vikings game back in the Dome day. He was arrested for yelling at a player as he left the field down the tunnel. He was taken downtown where the two cops stopped the elevator in mid-floor and beat him up terribly. I have no idea what he did to deserve that but I never saw him threaten anybody– just a big mouth.

      That said, Tony Bouza was brought in to fix the department, from NYC where he was a distinguished police reformer. IDK how well his “reforming” went, but some time later the Gang Strike Task Force was brought into existence to stop gang activity on the South Side over North.

      The Task Force bullied and terrorized the Black community with impunity– they were accused of entering homes where they took TVs and other property telling the people they stole it or bought it with “drug money”. After what seemed like years, the Task Force was caught with a motel room full of goods they appropriated, and accusations of taking sexual favors in exchange for overlooking some kind of other activity deemed “criminal.”

      You can look back at the legendary Mpls PD and see this is not a “Democrat” problem, and it never has been in mind lifetime.

      This is the viewpoint I still have regarding the department.

      May I say, I never thought of these rogue cops as “Republicans” and I doubt they are very civic minded anyway. The only explanation I can offer as to the long history of these sordid scandals is that the departments actually hired people of poor character and never could get rid of all of them.

      The history is Googlable.

      1. Richard, the city is run by Democrats, they hire the police chiefs, they set the rules for how the police force will act. They signed the current contract with the police union that made firing bad cops nearly impossible. This has been a Democratic run town for 50 years, so that means the police force has had Democratic oversight for 5 decades. Who is to blame for the police and condition of Minneapolis? The buck usually stops with those in control, why not now?

        1. You missed the point Joe. Tony Bouza was a definite Democratic adminstration’s attempt to fix police misconduct and corruption, hired at great expense and a wide search to FIX THE MPD. That was a long time ago. It failed. He left and many controversial cops stayed on.

          Hiring administrators does not include control of the workforce– you already know that falls to the Police Union and to Qualified Immunity that makes officers immune from basic discipline.

          In almost all matters of problem solving, the correct statement of the problem is the most important step.

          To that point, it can be proven that policing problems do not arise differently based on the party affiliation of the mayor or council persons.
          Even small towns have trouble getting rid of bad cops, despite their administrator’s political affiliation. You’re being simplistic.

          Famous Republican Mayor Rizzo’s Philadelphia was a war zone before and after 100s of residents were killed by his violent tough approach to policing.

          Maybe you don’t know any Republican mayors performing at the level you suggest. Do you?

          History will allow us to actually communicate– that is if we both know it.

  8. This issue is yet another example of how the Republican Party, and in particular here in Minnesota, tosses out red herrings in order to “gin up the base” – but more importantly, to create an illusion that they are not just sitting on their hands. In the current COVID-19 crisis, they repeatedly use terms like “abuse of power,” “tyranny,” “exceeded his authority,” and “unconstitutional” when referring to Governor Walz’ use of emergency powers, when they know perfectly well that he’s acting entirely within the bounds of his Constitutional authority. The Minnesota Health Emergency Powers Act (MEHPA) lays it out, quite simply and clearly, as anyone with a seventh-grade reading ability can easily understand – should they bother to try. I find it outrageous and disgraceful that Republicans lead their constituents to believe these things, by simply omitting inconvenient facts. Over the past three months, I’ve contacted several Republican lawmakers to point this out, from both rural and metro-area districts – and, I might add, with courtesy and respect. Yet not a single one has even bothered to respond, not even to attempt to refute my allegations that they’re purposely omitting facts, especially those that pertain to MEHPA. Point being, if I’m wrong in this regard, prove it! Their silence only reinforces my firm belief that I am right.

Leave a comment