House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer display the "American Rescue Plan" following passage of President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus disease relief bill.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer display the "American Rescue Plan" following passage of President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus disease relief bill. Credit: REUTERS/Erin Scott

The American Rescue Plan passed by the U.S. Congress and signed by President Joe Biden last week will send billions of dollars to the state of Minnesota.

But the $1.9 trillion law contains something unusual, at least among the three major COVID-19 relief laws passed over the last year: a $10 billion appropriation to the states for construction projects. Called the “Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund,” it will send $179 million to Minnesota. 

Construction projects are usually funded by the sale of state bonds, repaid with interest over 20 years. They are approved in what is called the bonding bill, which requires a 60 percent vote of the Minnesota House and Senate, a total that essentially gives the minority caucus in each chamber a veto.

While common for transportation projects, getting cash directly from the federal government to spend on state construction projects is rare. So rare that many of the legislators and state officials who deal with bonding knew little about it.

“We’re kind of in the dark,” said Sen. Sandra Pappas of St. Paul, the ranking DFLer on the Senate Capital Investment Committee. 

State Sen. Sandy Pappas
[image_caption]State Sen. Sandy Pappas[/image_caption]
What is known is that the money was added when the stimulus bill moved from the U.S. House to the U.S. Senate. Initially, it was going to be a deduction from the House plan to distribute $350 billion to states, local governments and tribal nations. But U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York insisted that it be additional funds.

Because it’s from the federal government, the money doesn’t have to go through the regular capital budgeting process in St. Paul, though it can if lawmakers agree. And committees in the House and Senate have been reviewing projects that could end up in a bonding bill at the end of the session. Gov. Tim Walz has requested a $518 million bonding bill for 2021. The Legislature passed a $1.9 billion bonding bill in October.

So the $179 million isn’t nearly as much as last year’s bill, but is in the ballpark of the pending Walz plan.

Capital project confusion

Yet Pappas said lawmakers aren’t sure what they can spend it on, when the state will receive it, whether it can reimburse the state for projects funded in the October bonding bill, such as the new $30 million Emergency Operations Center.

Would projects have to be related to the pandemic — or could they simply be shovel-ready projects that could quickly create construction jobs and boost the economy of the state? 

Committee staff members are waiting for detailed guidance from the U.S. Treasury. 

The bill itself doesn’t provide much guidance. The money, it states, is “to carry out critical capital projects directly enabling work, education, and health monitoring, including remote options, in response to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19).”

The chair of the Senate committee, Sen. Tom Bakk, an independent from Cook, declined to comment on the money, and his House counterpart, Rep. Fue Lee, DFL-Minneapolis, expressed similar reservations as Pappas. 

“Once we’ve received more guidance from the U.S. Treasury, we can begin the process of reviewing eligible projects and delivering on the needs of Minnesotans,” Lee said through a spokesperson.

States are familiar with federal grants for highways and transit, but those usually flow through the Department of Transportation and regional transit agencies like Metro Transit. Often they are for specific projects. 

Pappas said she couldn’t recall getting cash from the Congress that lets the state decide how to spend it, and isn’t certain whether the Legislature or Gov. Walz would make the decision.

Gov. Tim Walz
[image_credit]REUTERS/Lucas Jackson[/image_credit][image_caption]Gov. Tim Walz[/image_caption]
Current state law says federal funds that come to the state outside of legislative sessions can be directed by governors, as long as it is presented to an entity called the Legislative Advisory Council. But that group can’t block an expenditure, only comment on it. The rules are different while the Legislature is in session, but still do not give lawmakers a clear role.

A spokesperson for Minnesota Management and Budget said the state will wait until it receives more information before presenting any spending plans. That could take up to 60 days and put it toward the end of the regular legislative session or beyond it, leaving the Legislature out of the conversation.

If federal money does arrive during session and before the third budgetary deadline set by the House and Senate, the governor can submit spending plans as part of his budget. The Legislature can review those plans and any member of the LAC can put dollars on hold. But that only blocks spending until the hold is withdrawn, a bill passes spending the money differently or the regular session adjourns.

Money is only a small portion of the funds coming to Minnesota

The Coronavirus Capital Projects money is a relatively small amount compared to much larger state shares of other ARP distributions. It isn’t even the only infrastructure grant under the American Rescue Plan that could be sending dollars to Minnesota: The bill also sets aside $500 million to help build Veterans Homes, which Minnesota veterans advocates have been trying to get built in Preston, Bemidji and Montevideo.

Overall — based on a calculation by the Federal Funds Information for States — Minnesota governments and programs will benefit from $7.95 billion from the new law. 

That total doesn’t include money for rental assistance, mortgage assistance and utility payments for state residents who have not been able to keep up on payments due to the recession. Minnesota will receive at least $152 million for rental assistance and $50 million for mortgage assistance, with additional money coming via a formula based on each state’s “high-need grantees,” based on the number of low-income rental households, rent costs and unemployment rates during the recession.

The $7.95 billion also does not include the state’s share of money to help with vaccinations and increased COVID-19 testing.

The direct cash will total $2.57 billion to the state government and $2.12 billion for local governments. That compares to roughly $1 billion for each from the CARES Act last spring. 

The bill also will send $1.32 billion to the state’s public schools, $38 million to the state’s private schools that enroll significant numbers of low-income students and $552 million to colleges and universities. Transit agencies in Minnesota will share in $348 million.

In addition, FFIS calculates the $1,400 stimulus payments to Minnesotans will total $6.3 billion, much of which will end up benefiting the state’s economy. 

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

  1. Perfect, the state gets 179million with no idea how they are going to agree on spending it. Our tax dollars are being given out to states for “coronavirus capital projects fund” watch what it actually is spent on. I bet every lawmaker in St Paul has a pet pork project and in the end the most powerful lawmakers will get their way.
    Sad state of affairs here in Minnesota and everywhere tax dollars are given out in such a willy nilly fashion. Welcome to big government, bad under both major parties (Trump included) and getting worse under this administration.

    1. I’ll channel my former Rep. Erik Paulsen (The Math Guy) and help you out here:

      The bonding bill, always a contentious negotiation, settled on 1.9 B last October. These things are always wrought with compromise and never fill the often legitimate requests made like fixing failing water systems (See Michigan, Flint).

      The Biden stimulus gives our state an additional 9.4% of the budgeted amount to assist in the economic times of COVID. Not exactly drunken sailor kind of excess. The article, with a very poor headline, gets at the confusion that comes in as to where the 9.4% could be directed and the state seeks guidance to be sure they are in compliance it’s distribution of the 9.4%.

      Always happy to help.

      No thank you necessary…

  2. It’s not pork: give some of it to Saint Paul to fix our streets that are pounded every day by people who drive cars and increasingly heavy trucks here, often coming for non-taxpaying institutions like state government and colleges. We love you all but we need more money in our Public Works budget!

  3. I always wondered how they came up with the name “pork” for money going to pet projects. This state has how many billions in the rainy day fund? And now they are getting another 4.69 billion? Do people think money grows on trees? Does anybody realize the US is over 30 billion dollars in debt?
    What do you think the long range prognosis is for our country? I for one think we could easily turn into Argentina, the original “banana republic”. If you’re curious, just google what happened there. And don’t kid yourself, we’re marching down the same path. And the pace is picking up quickly.

    1. Umm no, “banana republics” refer to the Carribbean and northern South America where Dole literally bought off the government to protect its capitalistic interests. But I’m sure you watched “Evita”, so you’re clearly an expert on 20th century Latin American geopolitics. For further enlightenment, perhaps Google Pinochet, I’m sure you’ll find a lot to like.

    2. Not to worry, Dick Cheney told us years ago:

      “Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits posed a threat to the economy.

      Cheney cut him off, O’Neill said. “You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don’t matter,” he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: “We won the midterms [congressional elections]. This is our due.”

    3. “Does anybody realize the US is over 30 billion dollars in debt?”

      Well, You are right, it is over 30 billion, about a thousand times over 30 billion:

      The debt stands at 28 trillion…

  4. In villages like Red Wing, a small number of well-connected people will spend as much money as possible to benefit as few as possible. So, nothing new here.

  5. Governmental Fiscal responsibility has totally been thrown out the window. In our immense realm of borrowing, who is going to pay all of this ‘free money’ back? Yes, it does need to be paid back.

    1. Well no, it really doesn’t, since the vast majority is owed to ourselves, as a nation. We of course have a vested interest in maintaining our viability as such, which extends our credit worthiness.

Leave a comment