Gov. Tim Walz

Gov. Tim Walz
[image_credit]Graeme Jennings/Pool via REUTERS[/image_credit][image_caption]Gov. Tim Walz: “I don’t think that, for whatever reason, folks have come to the conclusion that they’re not going to get everything they want. There are going to have to be compromises to get there.”[/image_caption]
Is it possible for a state to have too much money?

Minnesota budget writers still haven’t reached full agreement on a two-year state budget despite having a large budget surplus, unprecedented cash grants from the federal government and state tax collections that are exceeding an already robust forecast.

In May, Gov. Tim Walz and the state’s two top legislative leaders reached a deal for a $52 billion two-year budget, an agreement that used most of Minnesota’s $1.6 billion surplus but also increased the state’s Rainy Day fund and left $1.23 billion of American Rescue Plan Act money unspent for now.

But none of those balances include the news Walz and the Legislature received Thursday, when Minnesota Management and Budget reported that actual tax collections in May were $1.8 billion above the current state forecast released in February. That’s 119 percent higher than expected.

[image_credit]Minnesota Management and Budget[/image_credit]

It is important to note that some of the percentage hike is due to the state’s one-month delay in its income tax deadline this year, from April 15 to May 16, which meant April collections were down as a result. But while April income tax collections were down by $651 million from expectations, May’s were up by $1.7 billion.

The most striking line in the Thursday collections report is this: “For fiscal year 2021, year-to-date receipts are now $23.113 billion, $2.170 billion (10.4 percent) more than projected.” 

The Legislature can’t spend that money in the budget currently under discussion — State Economist Laura Kalambokidis calls it “revenues in excess of forecast,” not a surplus — but it suggests that there will be another large revenue surplus when the state balances the books for the 2020-2021 fiscal year. It also is likely that a large projected surplus will appear when the next official spending and revenue forecast is produced, in November.

“It is incredible, unusual, extraordinary,” Kalambokidis said of the year between the start of the pandemic recession and a recovery that is beyond anyone’s projections. 

The oft-repeated explanation is that the economy in the United States and Minnesota didn’t falter as expected last May because so much of the economy kept operating. The jobs that were lost were at the lower ends of the pay scale, while the jobs that stayed often allowed people to work from home. Those positions tended to be higher earners — and higher income taxpayers. In addition, the financial markets recovered quickly, which added wealth to many individuals. Finally, the trillions of dollars in federal spending was spent on things that fuel tax collections.

“That’s a big part of the story,” Kalambokidis said. “Money from the federal government supported both household income and business income and that meant there was more consumer spending, much more consumer spending, than you would have expected in a normal economic downturn.”

Kalambokidis said the higher-than-expected tax collections in May were primarily via the state income tax and is the result of economic activity in 2020. Increases in sales taxes and corporate franchise taxes are tied more directly to what has been happening in 2021. Those too are up over the February forecast, indicating that what was happening with the economy in the second half of 2020 is continuing into this year.

State Economist Laura Kalambokidis
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Greta Kaul[/image_credit][image_caption]State Economist Laura Kalambokidis calls it “revenues in excess of forecast,” not a surplus.[/image_caption]
MMB will release another collections report on July 10 that will show whether June collections continue the positive trend. While that report won’t feature the big 2020 income tax payments that May’s did, they will have sales taxes, corporate franchise tax payments and income tax withholding amounts.

“Whatever we see in June is going to more reflect current economic activity rather than last year’s economic activity,” she said. “Those receipts are more correlated with what’s happening now in the economy.”

There continues to be economic suffering due to the recession. Employment has yet to fully recover, and businesses that closed aren’t helped by higher state tax collections. Minnesota Commissioner of Employment and Economic Development Steve Grove said Friday that only 57 percent of the 417,000 jobs lost to the recession have been recovered. There also remains a challenge of getting federal rental assistance money to the landlords of tenants who fell behind in rent payments. But the states continue to receive federal money from the American Rescue Plan, most of which is aimed at those still struggling.

Economists and forecasters don’t usually miss projections by this much. And it reflects the difficulty those same forecasters have had figuring out this recession — both in how much the economy would slow due to pandemic shutdowns and how quickly things would recover.

Nor is it something only happening in Minnesota. States across America are reporting tax collections for higher than even optimistic forecasts predicted last winter. 

“According to Urban Institute data, receipts in the first four months collectively were down $77.8 billion from a year earlier—including steep declines in April and May—then posted consecutive monthly year-over-year gains since July 2020 that totaled $77.9 billion as of February 2021,” the Pew Charitable Trusts said in a report on the recovery of lost revenue by the 50 states.

“There’s been this steady news of one state after another saying their tax receipts are exceeding expectations and the federal government as well,” Kalambokidis said. “Volatility in the economy and the unusual features of this economic downturn are what’s feeding uncertainty in both the economic forecasting and the revenue forecasting.

“There have been larger changes month to month in the U.S. economic forecast than we normally see,” she said.

All this comes just after passage of the American Rescue Plan Act, which sent $350 billion to state and local governments to replace lost revenue during the pandemic recession, money will likely not end up being lost.

Making things even more strange, the way the U.S. Treasury is allowing states and local governments to calculate lost revenue will likely exceed what those governments actually lost. But by classifying ARP money as lost revenue, state and local governments can spend it in ways not envisioned by ARP — in ways unrelated to the pandemic.

Walz, Hortman and Gazelka step in to address ‘sticking points’

So if it’s not about the money — and if the governor, House Speaker Melissa Hortman and Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka have agreed on spending targets — why is a 2021-23 budget still unapproved? 

“It’s ideological on certain things,” Walz said Thursday. Spending is agreed to but the policies stuffed inside each of the series of bills that have to pass are not, especially in the area of policing reforms, education priorities and figuring out an offramp from the state’s 14-month-old ban on renter evictions.

“I don’t think that, for whatever reason, folks have come to the conclusion that they’re not going to get everything they want,” Walz said. “There are going to have to be compromises to get there.”

To that end, Walz, Gazelka and Hortman have begun doing what they did in 2019: meet with committee chairs from the DFL House and the GOP Senate to solve the “sticking points,” solutions that could include jettisoning areas of disagreement.

Walz said Thursday he will extend his declaration of a peacetime state of emergency on Monday and will, in turn, convene a special session of the Legislature to provide it an opportunity to rescind that declaration. The prime agenda item, however, is to complete the two year state budget by adopting 13 (or 14 if a state bonding package is included) omnibus spending and policy bills.

The authority to spend money by state agencies expires at midnight June 30, the last day of the two-year budget adopted in the spring of 2019.

Join the Conversation

28 Comments

  1. The simple answer to your question “Is it possible for a state to have too much money?” is yes when you are one of 13 states to tax Social Security and when you are among the top 5 most taxed states in the United States.

    1. To be fair, with inflation running rampant the spending power of that money will be halved by next year.

      1. Oh for Pete’s sake inflation is not running rampant. Annualized inflation over the past 24 months was just over 3%. Anyone who does not understand that the economy was in free fall one year ago and is mostly regaining it’s footing now does not understand economics and should not be commenting on it.

        Employers like it when workers compete for jobs, but when they have to compete for workers, why it’s time to get the fainting couches out if they have to raise wages a buck or two an hour.

    2. Yes Ian, but after 50 years in MN this is my last one paying MN Income taxes!

      1. While 99% of the readers will say “good riddance”, I say good luck wherever you land and come back to visit.

  2. A budget surplus or “revenues in excess of forecast” equates to overtaxation.

    1. By that logic we’ve been “under-taxed” by the Federal government these last 200 years

    2. Perfect. And a budget deficit then must represent under taxation.

      Remember the Rainman of gubernatorial excellence?

      Jesse said when we had too much, send it back (Jesse Checks) and when we had too little he knew a tax increase was called for.

      And that is what happened in 2002 and one reason he chose not to run against good old TPAW who said “no problem, Grover Norquist and I got this covered”

        1. No, it’s not that simple. It can also be due to unproductive tax giveaways to billionaires and corporations that run up the red ink while doing nothing to juice the economy, raise wages, or increase unemployment.

        2. That is cant. A deficit means that not enough is being taken in to meet expenditures.

          Is it really necessary to point out that budgets are set my representatives who were (for now, anyway) democratically chosen by their constituents? Every nickel in the state or federal budget is there because someone wanted it there and had sufficient clout to make it happen. There wasn’t some secret cabal deciding to spend money for the sake of spending money.

    3. Or underspending.
      Roads and bridges are not all financed by Federal funds, not to mention schools.

  3. Perhaps it’s time to follow the federal example and exempt unemployment and PPP taxation – lotsa talk so far; no action!

    1. Yes, it was Reagan, the guy who supported the working man and cut taxes, that began the taxing of UI benefits. It’s time to unwind that.

  4. Seeing as how if we were 1.8 billion on the negative side the Republicans would be quick to blame Walz policies for the problem.

    So:

    Congratulations Governor Walz for great stewardship of the state during the pandemic and leading to us this rapid recovery.

    Fair enough?

  5. Do not enact permanent spending increases Finding a $20 in your pocket on laundry day is not a reason to finance a new sports car

    1. What spending increases should we not have passed?

      You sound very knowledgeable on this, so please be specific.

      1. I was referring to new programs, this may well be one time money, use itto fix the leaking roof, or.save for the next downturn.
        I cant predict what schemes “free” money will come out of the legislature

        1. What criterion would you use for starting new programs? When would you start them? When revenues are flat? Or declining? Or would you never start new programs?

          The Transportation Department (originally the Highway Department) was once a new permanent program, begun while WWI was raging across Europe. Maybe we never should have established MNIT (IT Services).

  6. Tax the rich! Oh wait, they don’t actually pay anything. Tax them anyway, it helps DFLers get re-elected…

    1. High income people pay a lot of taxes in MN. Wealthy families, like the Dayton’s and Pohlad’s, do not.

      1. But they don’t pay nearly enough. And out of curiosity, just who qualifies as “high income”?

    2. Who cares about fairness or equity, right? The important thing is we don’t let the DFL do something that is a part of its platform!

      1. I’m with you all the way! Keep raising taxes on the rich, who, as we have seen, don’t really pay any taxes. The State will still be rolling in cash and continue to spend more (4-5% more per year for decades) but it won’t be the rich paying their fair share, just paying the bulk of the burden. As long as we can keep reducing the percentage of people who actually pay income taxes, everyone (the DFL) benefits and our society is better off.

Leave a comment