Minnesota State Capitol
Minnesota State Capitol Credit: MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan

Minnesota’s budget surplus grew, a lot, with the new economic and revenue forecast teased by the office of Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) Monday morning.

The increase in the surplus for the current two-year budget grew from $7.75 billion to $9.25 billion. That $1.5 billion increase since December matches what past surpluses have been in total.

While the full – and lengthy – forecast document will be released this afternoon, MMB usually releases the topline number in the morning. It said the projected surplus for the next biennium – the one that begins July 1, 2023 – remains strong but didn’t grow. That makes this increase in what is available to spend this legislative session more-likely to fuel one-time spending rather than ongoing spending or tax cuts.

And MMB warned that inflation and “geopolitical conflict” – a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine – create uncertainty that the forecast will be borne out over the next 16 months of the current budget.

“ A higher income, consumer spending, and corporate profit forecast results in an improved revenue projection while spending is slightly lower in E-12 education and Health and Human Services,” MMB stated in its release.

The new estimate of tax collections for the rest of the two-year budget period and how much it exceeds approved spending sets the formal number for  2022 budget talks. The current budget will spend $52 billion over its 24 months. 

Minnesota is not alone in seeing large surpluses. Like most states it has seen a steady improvement in economic growth since the deep but brief pandemic recession in the spring and summer of 2020. Both federal stimulus spending and the fact that many workers could work from home and continue to pay income taxes and sales taxes quickly turned deficits to surpluses across the U.S. 

Inflation helps and hurts state budgeting. While it increases costs of some goods and services purchased by government, it can also bump up sales tax collections, which are based on sales and sales prices. The former shows up on the spending side and the latter shows up in the revenue forecast.

There was some suggestion of a decline in the surplus when MMB released its quarterly economic update. In that report, the state’s national economic forecast vendor IHS Markit downgraded its national economic forecast from the November forecast that drove the $7.75 billion surplus projection.  That November forecast was based on a rather robust prediction for the national economy that IHS Markit determined was too optimistic. The International Monetary Fund also downgraded both global and U.S. growth projections in January.

That does not appear to have impacted the 18-month string of positive forecasts and tax collections reports.

The December surplus projection was a near record, based not only on its size but on its relationship to state spending. Mark Haveman, the executive director of the Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence, wrote that the February 1999 surplus amounted to 15.6 percent of the projected spending. The December surplus of $7.75 billion was 14.9 percent. But if the $1 billion in unspent federal money from the American Rescue Plan, the state’s available cash is 17 percent of the two-year spending plan.

That record was smashed Monday morning.

Already the governor and legislators have been proposing ways to spend the surplus as set in December. Gov. Tim Walz, for example, has proposed a one-time batch of tax rebates along with spending proposals that spent much of the current budget surplus and much of the next budget’s surplus as well.

Majority Republicans in the state senate have some new spending in their emerging plan but most is one-time only payments for items such as police recruitment and signing bonuses for hard-to-hire jobs in law enforcement and long-term care. The bulk of the Senate GOP plan is for tax cuts, specifically caring for the lowest tax bracket – that every taxpayer pays all or some of their taxes in – from 5.35 percent to 2.8 percent.

While not yet unanimous, there is support from Walz and lawmakers from both parties to use up to $2.7 billion of the surplus to pay back a loan to the federal government that was used to maintain jobless benefits during the recession and refill the unemployment trust fund. 

Even Monday as the forecast was being released, House DFLers were promoting using $300 million of the surplus to extend rental assistance as a federal program is ending.

In addition to record surpluses, Minnesota also has a record rainy day savings account which grew to $2.656 billion.

 

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Quick – let the income tax payers in MN get a tax cut before the money is spent this year and in future years.

    “A lot of Walz’s proposed spending would be embedded into the state operating budget, obligating the state to spend more in the future to keep those programs in place.” MinnPost 1/27

  2. It isn’t often you see Republicans proposing tax cuts that make the income tax more progressive. I would personally like to see the sales tax come down instead but an income tax cut that only hits the lowest tax bracket should find bipartisan support.

  3. There are a couple interesting things in the actual report (it is quite readable).

    “Spending estimates for the FY 2022-23 biennium are slightly lower than the November forecast. Expenditures in the current biennium are now expected to be $51.729 billion,
    a reduction of $270 million (0.5 percent). The decrease is primarily driven by changes in education spending due to lower than projected pupil counts and decreases in special education transportation costs.”

    There is no reason to decrease education spending, in fact we should probably be increasing this spending to make sure wages match pace with inflation.

    “An additional quarter of enhanced federal match, due to an extension in the federal public health emergency, is projected to decrease Medical Assistance expenditures”

    This should be treated as one-time money and not change the taxation formulas.

    “The stadium reserve balance is expected to be $327 million by the end of the biennium and is estimated to grow to $581 million by the end of FY 2025. The balance in higher in each year due to a higher lawful gambling tax forecast. The cash flow account remains at the November level, $350 million.”

    How much do we need in this fund? At what point do we use that revenue somewhere besides sports stadiums?

    “IHS expects inflation to be eased by the gradual resolution of supply-chain issues, a partial reversal last year’s surge in oil prices, a deceleration in food prices, consumer demand reverting to services, and rising U.S. labor force participation.”

    I wouldn’t count those chickens before they hatch.

    https://mn.gov/mmb-stat/000/az/forecast/2022/budget-and-economic-forecast/february-2022-forecast.pdf

  4. With the world gone mad, care should be exercised with new spending ir tax cuts. That extra money can vanish like a belch in the wind

    1. Correct. There’s also no shortage of infrastructure projects that could be tackled with up-front spending, however. The U of MN and MN State alone have ginormous maintenance backlogs that could be dealt with, which would continue to support the economy…

  5. At some point the Federal Government will stop giving 10’s of billions to states yearly for assorted “disaster” funds. You think maybe we should put some of our tax money away for a rainy day?

    1. well…we are: our state has a “rainy day fund” and it’s larger than it’s been pretty much in the history of the state. But that’s good, because we are also subject to great and more sudden economic swings than ever before, and this provides protection from drastic mid-budget cuts.

Leave a comment