Electric bike
The credits in state Sen. Omar Fateh’s amendment would allow a resident who buys from an in-state retailer to claim a credit equal to 75% of the purchase price of an e-bike plus accessories like helmets, locks, bags and reflective clothing. Credit: REUTERS/Ralph Orlowski

Minnesotans purchasing electric-assisted bikes could get a tax credit worth up to $1,500 under an incentive added to the Minnesota Senate transportation budget.

A prominent seller of electric cargo bikes called the proposal generous, though the initial program would be capped at $2 million. A similar program in the city of Denver that also capped how much the government would spend on rebates ran out of money in days.

Luke Breen
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Greta Kaul[/image_credit][image_caption]Luke Breen[/image_caption]
“This is a big deal,” said Luke Breen, the owner of Perennial Cycle in south Minneapolis. “That would lure a ton of people to electric bikes.”

The proposal, led by Sen. Omar Fateh, DFL-Minneapolis, is patterned after the Denver program and statewide incentive for e-bikes in Colorado. The credits in Fateh’s amendment would allow a resident who buys from an in-state retailer to claim a credit equal to 75% of the purchase price of an e-bike plus accessories like helmets, locks, bags and reflective clothing. A couple filing their taxes jointly could each take advantage of the credit.

The value of the credit steps down at incomes higher than $50,000 for a married couple, $25,000 for a single tax filer until it reaches 50%. To make sure the $2 million cap isn’t exceeded, bike buyers would have to send an application to the state Department of Revenue, which would distribute tax certificates on a first-come, first-served basis.

While the Denver program quickly reached its cap, the statewide program in Colorado that begins this summer has a pot of $12 million.

State Sen. Omar Fateh
[image_caption]State Sen. Omar Fateh[/image_caption]
Fateh said he was approached by people in his district asking for e-bike incentives. “I’m glad that they did. Folks just want to get more cars off the road and make folks healthier,” Fateh said.

The bill includes provisions to assure that 40% of the credits go to buyers at middle and low-incomes. Fateh had introduced his proposal as a separate bill with a House version sponsored by Rep. Lucy Rehm, DFL-Chanhassen. Often bills that appropriate money are introduced and heard in committees but are then incorporated into budget omnibus bills. 

Rep. Frank Hornstein, the Minneapolis DFLer who chairs the House Transportation Committee, said the provision is not in the House version of the budget but said “that’s definitely an item we’ll be talking about in the conference committee.

State Rep. Frank Hornstein
[image_caption]State Rep. Frank Hornstein[/image_caption]
“I personally strongly support that,” Hornstein said.

Breen said his store has moved toward the sale of premium e-bikes, especially cargo bikes, in a price range from $3,000 to $11,000. But chain bike stores carry e-bikes that cost $1,800, so the credit would be worth between $900 and $1,350 depending on a buyer’s income.

The price for e-bikes is higher than for bikes without electric assistance, but Breen said buyers tend to use them less for recreation and more for transportation. The price comparisons aren’t to a bike but to a car. A large market is parents with small children who use cargo bikes to replace a second car, he said.

Breen said he doesn’t think the rebates will change the type of customer who is shopping for an e-bike. He said it could move buyers who are already thinking about e-bikes but are on the fence. They are people, he said, who are thinking, “I want to drive less and ride more.”

That makes the bill central to a DFL legislative theme of reducing emissions by funding and creating incentives for electric cars and buses, heat pumps and solar panels.

Endorsed by state bike groups such as People for Bikes and the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota or BikeMN, the bills were aimed at the market Breen touts as his strongest: those who want to partially or fully shift their commuting and errand running trips from cars to e-bikes.

BikeMN cited a study (partly funded by People for Bikes) that found that if 15% of car trips were made by e-bike, emissions would drop by 12%. A North American survey by professors at Portland State University found that 46% of e-bike commute trips replaced an automobile commute. 

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

  1. Nothing worse than pedaling hard up an incline, being passed by pair of Sr Citizens cruising on an e-bike.

    Seriously, ebikes are available today. We need a tax credit for it?

  2. Only e-bikes that are UL (underwriters labs) approved should be eligible for the rebate. Cheap e-bikes with faulty batteries are fire hazards.

  3. If you want to increase the cost of something, have the government subsidize it. – Econ 101.
    Expect the price of these things to drift up to take advantage of this new law.

    “This is a big deal,” said Luke Breen, the owner of Perennial Cycle in south Minneapolis. “That would lure a ton of people to electric bikes” he gushed.

    1. Of course Luke Breen thinks it is a great idea. If I owned a store, I’d love for the govt to give my customers a big wad of cash to spend in my store too.

  4. I love my e-bike, which I bought from Luke Breen. But this proposed subsidy has me scratching my head. The article points to the goal of reducing emissions in transportation. But it differs greatly from Denver’s program:
    – Denver readjusted their program for income levels (though higher low-income thresholds than the MN law), and the rebate amount varied from $750-$1200. I leave it to others to figure out how practical it would be for a single person with an income under a $41,000 to pay a $1000+ for a bike, then hold that credit to be recouped on next year’s taxes. Denver had a straight rebate system; no waiting to file your taxes.
    -Denver’s program is focused on the city, not an entire state. Does it really make sense to make this a statewide program if the issue is sustainability and transportation? No doubt someone in Mazeppa would legitimately want access to this program, but is there infrastructure and density everywhere in the state that aligns with the goal of the program?
    -Denver’s rebate program was set up through local bike shops (LBS), which makes sense since an LBS can stand by their bikes and repair them. It makes sense to give an advantage to small, community businesses. But the MN bill will have many people heading to Costco or Sam’s Club, which don’t have repair facilities. In fact, there’s nothing in the MN bill that I see that prevents someone from ordering on line and out of state.

    Personally, I wish our legislators would push to make state taxes simpler rather than creating more complexity. Perhaps this law would be better thought out if it wasn’t folded into an omnibus bill.

    1. While I, personally, DO plan to rush out and buy an ebike if this credit passes (I’ve been considering an ebike for at least 3 years), you made some very good points here. I do support the idea of giving financial incentives for getting people onto ebikes, but there absolutely needs to be stronger feedback loops to ensure the credit is going to those who actually need it (i.e. the income caps should be even lower), and some more certainty that the individuals using the credit will actually bike for transportation (i.e. reducing/replacing trips that would otherwise be taken by car), not just recreational rides. I definitely agree that, at the lowest incomes, the discount needs to be at the point of sale. Someone living paycheck to paycheck can’t wait 9 months for a tax refund…that’s just common sense. I strongly agree that the credit should not go towards junk ebikes on Amazon (which you have to assemble yourself, good luck), but that’s harder to legislate.

      Ebikes are a reasonably affordable (when compared to a car) transportation innovation that make a lot more medium-length trips (3-10 miles) possible on bike for more people. With an “analog” bike, for the average person I think the upper limit for work commutes is under 5 miles, maybe under 3. With an ebike, that number could be as high as 10, and that dramatically expands the pool of potential bike commuters.

      TL;DR – Ebikes are a great thing! Getting more people on them is a great thing! I’m just not sure this tax credit bill is ready for primetime. I hope the authors realize that soon and improve it or it will probably get wiped out of the tax bill in conference committee.

  5. I was surprised by the negative tone of the comments was thinking they’d be more encouraging.
    What happened to “we all do better when we all do better”?
    Is there not even a little urgency regarding climate change?
    Is it that people using the bike lanes with frequency would prove your arguments against them may have been short sighted?
    Econ 101 will point out that the market isn’t nimble enough to react to the speed the subsidy will get claimed (gone in a week at the latest).
    I just don’t get why one would think we shouldn’t even bother to try it.
    Cut off your nose to spite your planet much?

  6. Portland State University? Look what’s happening to Portland, we don’t want that here.

    1. So, promoting e-bike usage will encourage a downtown homeless problem? I am sure there is a strong statistical correlation. Maybe you need to go out for a bike ride.

      1. Heh, you clearly aren’t aware of the exercise habits, or rather lack thereof, of your average conservative, tr…er internet provocateur, if you will. The poor man is apt to keel over walking to the door. A bike ride would be like desecrating the dead.

  7. Since E bikes are a motorized vehicle , will they be required to obey traffic laws , pay an annual license fee and not be allowed on recreational pedestrian/ bike trails ?
    This is just a government handout of taxpayer money that will have little affect on GHG emissions or climate change.

  8. We may not have qualified for a tax credit, but my wife and I have each purchased an E bike within the last year or two. When the weather is decent my E bike has replaced my car as my preferred mode of transportation. I rarely drove my car and completely relied on my E bike to get around town and to grocery shop last spring, summer and fall. I absolutely love it! And as you might imagine discovering all sorts of things, I’ve been missing in the neighborhood driving around in my car.

    1. That’s fantastic. I love riding my bike a lot during the summer too. I’ve been looking at an e-bike for an elderly aunt. They seem great and I’m glad you got one.

      I think the only pushback here is for the subsidy, not the e-bikes themselves.

  9. E-bikers are among the most rude users of the regional bike paths and trails I’ve encountered. They should only be allowed where motorized vehicles are permitted.

  10. If the state is going to be investing tax dollars in anything bike related I would prefer that it be used to find a way to ..hmm…let’s see, how to phrase this without setting anyone’s hair on fire…find some way for bicyclists to PAY directly for the use of these incredibly expensive bike lanes!
    Raised lanes, separated lanes, striping etc.
    All cost and all come fom the general fund

    Cars pay for the use of roads by many means ~ the ever popular (and too low, imho, gas tax), license tabs.

    Is there no way, no mechanism to recoup some of the investment made FOR bikers to get bikers themselves to pay for the facilities they enjoy?

    Maybe scanners like they have on the freeway express/toll roads?
    But that would only capture those who choose to bike where the scanners are placed.

    I don’t have the answer. Just my usual question ~ as I watch yet ANOTHER major artery through town utterly devastated by forced squeezing in of bike lanes (to the detriment of all small businesses and ALL the trees! Be wary. Be very wary when a bike lane is promised to a street near you. Whether you want them or not, read the fine print and learn the full costs!!)

    Long story long..

    I’d like to see funding used to ensure that bike facilities are self sustaining. Or can grow in that direction.

Leave a comment