two men talk
Minneapolis DFLers Sen. Scott Dibble and Rep. Frank Hornstein, chairs of the Legislature's conference committee on transportation, confer the weekend before the expected adjournment of the legislative session. Credit: Peter Callaghan | MinnPost

A House-Senate conference committee has finally reached a deal on increasing funding for transportation and transit that includes inflationary increases in the gas tax, a 50-cent delivery fee, and hikes in the motor vehicle sales tax and annual car tab fees.

In addition, the deal brokered by the two DFL transportation committee chairs — Rep. Frank Hornstein and Sen. Scott Dibble — has a 0.75% metro-area sales tax mostly for transit but also for county-decided roads projects.

“I think we have before us a historic and transformative transportation bill that covers all modes of transportation in all regions of the state,” Hornstein said.

Added to an already passed metro-area 0.25% sales tax for housing programs and projects, the seven counties of Hennepin, Ramsey, Washington, Dakota, Scott, Anoka and Carver counties will see a 1% sales tax increase.

Taken together, the transportation tax and fee increases would raise an additional $1.48 billion for roads, bridges, transit and other transportation needs in the next two-year budget period and $2.22 billion for the following two-year budget.

The two Minneapolis DFLers have been advocating for increasing transportation taxes because unlike the state general fund, transportation taxes have been underperforming. That’s led to deficits in road and bridge maintenance and construction. While the gas tax is constitutionally directed toward transportation, it is fixed at 28.5 cents per gallon. While construction costs have increased, the gas tax hasn’t. In addition, better gas mileage and more electric vehicles on the road results in lower gas usage and lower tax collections.

The Minnesota Department of Transportation says the gas tax raised $893 million last year and is projected to raise $892 million in 2027. Transportation taxes collect about $2.5 billion a year in Minnesota, but MnDOT analysts say the pandemic impacted transportation taxes differently, and more negatively, than it did general taxes like income taxes, corporate franchise taxes and general sales taxes.

Blame lower car sales during the recession and then lower sales when chip shortages reduced supply. Blame less taxable gas purchases on factors like more efficient vehicles and a spike in gas prices that doesn’t benefit the state’s per-gallon tax.

The Minnesota gas tax rate was last raised in 2008, and doing so required a bipartisan override of a governor’s veto. Since then, Republicans have used it as a potent political weapon, reminding voters — especially when gas prices are high like they were last summer – that it was DFLers who voted to override then-Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s veto. The last time an increase was proposed — in 2018 by Gov. Tim Walz — it was quickly shot down.

“We had that discussion. Didn’t happen,” Walz said this week of his 20-cent increase over four years. “I’ve said all along we need to have an honest conversation about long-term, dedicated, steady financing for transportation.” Minnesota, he frequently notes, has the fourth most road miles among the states behind California, Texas and Illinois.

“The people of Minnesota understand you get what you pay for, and when it comes to roads we’re gonna have to figure out a dedicated source,” he said. Gas tax increases? “I’m open to it.”

The National Construction Cost Index measures increases costs of building roads and bridges and varies by state. Nationally, the index jumped 20% in 2022, according to the Federal Highway Administration, but was 13% in Minnesota. But in 2021 it fell by 3%.

Transit funding has been bailed out by cash grants by the Legislature and federal funds from pandemic relief legislation. But that runs out and, combined with lower fare box revenue from declining ridership, regional transit is headed for a cliff of deficits, Dibble said.

The regional sales tax can be used for operations and construction of rail and bus lines. 

MnDOT Commissioner Nancy Daubenberger said the funding package will go a long way toward filling a 20-year funding gap for maintaining and expanding the transportation system. The agency has estimated that it will be $27 billion short of transportation needs over the next 20 years.

She said the budget provides the matching funds for the federal infrastructure bill, and she said MnDOT appreciates the funding for multi-modal transportation and the electric vehicle infrastructure. 

“We’re very happy to be at this point, excited about the historic investment this has for transportation,” Daubenberger said. She was less happy about a number of highway projects that are directed in the bill — earmarks. MnDOT thinks projects should be chosen by the agency based on needs and timing, not by legislators.

Margaret Anderson Kelliher, the director of Minneapolis public works who is also a former House speaker and MnDOT commissioner, said she thinks the Legislature’s latest agreement on transportation is a bigger influx of funding than that 2008 gas tax increase and a regional transit sales tax that was added following the I-35W bridge collapse that killed 13 people.

“This will be an excellent bill for the future,” she said. “This will give people a lot more options. There is more of a focus on, I believe, regionalism in terms of future work between counties, the work of the Met Council and Metro Transit. So that is really, I think, a big leap forward.”

One difference between the 2008 package and this one is its focus on climate change, she said. “We’ve come a long way, right?, in terms of looking at everything from (vehicle miles traveled) to greenhouse gas reduction.” 

Rep. Brad Tabke, DFL-Shakopee, said the bill contains both the structure and funding — $2 million — for his plan to tackle crime and disruptions on light rail trains in Minneapolis and St. Paul. The interventions will begin with a social services emphasis to get help to people who are homeless or struggling with drug abuse or mental illness. But a law-enforcement element will follow to enforce a new code of conduct on trains. It will start as soon as the bill is signed.

The transportation bill also contains $195 million to match federal money to build passenger rail between the Twin Cities and Duluth, called the Northern Lights Express.

Republicans in the Legislature continue to oppose increasing the gas tax or other transportation-dedicated taxes and fees. They have supported shifting more of the general sales tax collected on auto parts to transportation, something that raises about $200 million a year. The conference report will set in motion a 10-year shift so that 100% of that revenue eventually moves to transportation uses.

House Minority Leader Lisa Demuth of Cold Spring connected the transportation tax increases to other tax hikes elsewhere in legislation.

“Democrats’ fixation on raising taxes on everyday Minnesotans has to stop,” she said in a statement. “We have a $17.5 billion surplus — tax increases of any kind should be off the table, but especially these regressive taxes that hurt lower income Minnesotans the most. While we know Democrats have been itching to raise the gas tax for years now — with Governor Walz being one of the most vocal proponents of it — no Minnesotan will ‘understand’ why this is necessary at a time when we have a record surplus.”

The Legislature’s transportation funding agreement at a glance:

Gas Tax: Statehouse rumors had included both a per-gallon increase and inflationary indexing. The penny or two hike did not show up in the conference committee report but the inflation provision did. It would have the state Department of Transportation reset the tax on Aug. 1 of each year, but the increase cannot exceed 3 cents a year.

The budget estimates that it would increase gas tax collections by $155 million in the first two year budget and $266 million in the following two-year budget.

The gas tax is distributed to state trunk highways, county state aid streets and municipal state aid streets.

Metro Sales Tax: Revenue from the 0.75% tax would be shared. The Met Council would get 83% of it for transit and “active transportation,” which includes biking, walking and rolling. The seven counties in the metro area would get 17% for wider transportation needs. The new sales tax would raise $766 million in the first two years, $973 million in the second two years. It took a strange path, passing the House at 0.75% but falling to 0.50% in the Senate. The conference committee restored it to the House level.

But it also contains a provision that prevents the Met Council from spending any of the money on Southwest Light Rail Transit until a task force completes its work on an examination of how the agency is governed. Both Dibble and Hornstein favor an elected, rather than appointed, Met Council but the task force will make that recommendation.

Met Council Chair Charlie Zelle called the money “robust” and “truly transformative for transit.”

Delivery Fee: This is a new tax in Minnesota, though it has been used in Colorado as a way to replace shrinking gas tax receipts. Initially passed at 75 cents per delivery, it faced vigorous opposition from retailers, restaurants and package delivery companies like Amazon. Now at 50 cents, it also exempts food deliveries and other deliveries costing less than $100. It lets small businesses with annual sales of less than $1 million escape collecting the fee.

If a product being delivered is sales tax exempt — prescription drugs, for example — no fee would be collected. The new fee raises $59 million in the upcoming budget and $130 million in 2026 and 2027. That is less than the $200 million a year that would have been raised when the fee was first proposed at 75 cents and covered more deliveries.

Still, members of a coalition that formed to oppose the fee were disappointed.

“Consumers and businesses don’t need an entirely new, complicated taxing system when we already have several existing mechanisms in place to raise funds for transportation,” said Bruce Nustad, president of the Minnesota Retailers Association. “This unpopular, unproven idea is wrong for Minnesotans and the businesses serving them. Calling the tax a ‘road improvement fee’ won’t fool Minnesotans.”

Car tabs and motor vehicle sales taxes: Increases in these existing taxes would raise about $350 million in the upcoming two-year budget.

Join the Conversation

41 Comments

  1. Why is every new bill “historic “ and much needed by folks who do not want to pay more?? More taxes, more taxes, more taxes! Remember folks, light rail was “historic and much needed “ also.

    1. Because each bill is one step closer to making conservatism (and conservatives) a part of history only.

      1. Your comment is typical of partisanship in this country. If it was meant as satire it failed.

    2. The Left actually believes that your net pay is what the government “allows” you to keep. So they own you and your labor and a tax increase simply means they’ve decided that you get to keep less because they need more. They see you as a sharecropper. Seriously. I’ve had them admit that’s their belief.

    3. Public transit is most beneficial for people who can not afford a car. Those folks deserve better and we all need to chip in to help them.

      A lot of people would be unleashed from an enormous financial burden if we gave them viable alternatives to driving, but most folks in the Twin Cities metro area don’t have any alternative. I’m glad we’re changing that.

  2. It is easier to list the taxes that are not being raised – than to list the taxes that are being raised.

  3. Didn’t even mention the 0.7% payroll tax for the medical leave program. Add that to the 1% sales tax and I’m taking a 1.7% pay cut. Not including the increased auto license fees and increased property taxes. But the governor keeps talking about how millionaires should pay more. I’m not a millionaire but I’ll be paying all of these.

    1. a 1% sales tax increase is absolutely not a 1% pay cut, unless every dollar you spend is on taxable goods (trust me, you don’t)

    2. There’s also going to be a roughly doubling of the boat registration taxes. It wasn’t mentioned here because its in the Natural Resources bill. There are more than 800,000 boats registered in Minnesota – second most in the US and the most per capita of any state. So this tax hike will affect a large number of Minnesotans and apparently will bring in tens of millions of dollars in new money per year.

      1. What is the current boat registration fee? What will it rise to?

        And, importantly, is it annually indexed for inflation?

        1. There’s not just one boat registration fee. If I recall when I looked at the bill, there were like maybe a dozen different levels of boat fees depending on the size and such, and it appeared as if most roughly doubled in price. I did not see any language authorizing the fees to be indexed to inflation.

  4. I am so excited our transit will finally have the funding it needs, with just a tiny sales tax (which doesn’t apply to groceries or clothes by the way). I hope Metro Transit can really improve their service now!

    I hope they are able to speed up their timeline on some projects. I was super excited to hear a BRT line was coming near me, but it’s still 3 years out. This bill is a huge win for anyone who rides Transit like me. It’s about time we stop subsidizing cars so much and put some money into more fiscally responsible transportation.

      1. I want us to fund public transit so that more people can use it, including myself. It’s a more space-efficient and economically viable mode of transportation. It’s also a fantastic method of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cars.

        Transportation is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Minnesota, and cars are a huge part of that. If you choose to live in the metro, you can pay for the services a metropolitan area provides. I challenge you to try public transit! It’s about providing options for people.

        1. No thanks! That is a challenge that I choose not to accept, primarily for safety, but mostly since transit doesn’t get me anywhere I choose to go, but probably for safety reasons.

      2. Oh, you mean the way rural counties are subsidized by Metro taxpayers? I guess they could start paying for their own water treatment plants.

        1. Republican tax dollars also subsidize water treatment facilities in rural Minnesota and we have no problem with it.
          Seems like more of a priority than expanding a mass transit system where fare revenue pays less than 20% its operating cost and their current project is $750 million over budget.

    1. Heck yeah, Zachary! I am super excited, as well. My hope is to someday not need to rely on my car at all and that we convert more of Minneapolis into walkable, livable space where public transit abounds.

      1. So why should the rest of the seven county metro area finance your transit ? Make it a Minneapolis tax ….. although it’s going to need to be higher than .75 %. You can also increase your fare rate so you can pay your way to use it.

        1. Pretty sure Minneapolis pays more than its fair share to support the 7-county metro AND the rest of the state.

          1. And the same can be said of the school district. Oh wait.
            Mpls. can’t fund itself, just ask the Mayor.

          1. I live on the Iron Range and with the Duluth line finally looking like it’s going to run, I’d love to see a light rail/commuter rail line running from Grand Rapids, with stops in most/all Iron Range towns to Duluth. It’s that continued build out that will eventually help change the car culture.

    2. Same!! I hope more people are able to live without the huge financial burden of car ownership thanks to this. Those who keep their car can experience lower traffic, too, once they have fewer cars on the road to compete with! It’s a win-win.

      I wish the B-Line wasn’t a year and a half away x_x the 21 is so slow!!

  5. “I’ve said all along we need to have an honest conversation about long-term, dedicated, steady financing for transportation.” Minnesota, [Walz] frequently notes, has the fourth most road miles among the states behind California, Texas and Illinois.

    The obvious point of criticism is that funding road maintenance through a gas tax is not a long term solution. Fleet electrification is accelerating. As the share of EVs grows, the gas tax will collect less. But conservatives instead complain that there’s any sort of tax at all. Roads don’t build themselves, so it’s time to take some ownership in solving the problem. I.e. pay up, or stop using the roads.

  6. Why all the excitement about the Northern Lights Express? More taxpayer money down the drain. I grew up when there was train service to Duluth. Economic failure. Hey, let’s do it again!

    1. Public transit is a service, not a business! It doesn’t need to be profitable, it just needs to be useful. Some things are worth paying for.

      1. Traveling to Duluth by train is less useful and much more expensive than existing options. Subsidizing the bus routes between Duluth and the Twin Cities would be a lot more economical and accomplish the same result.

    2. Nobody says these ideas have to make sense. There is 0 accountability for any grand idea that turns into reality. Failure after Failure and we keep doing it again and again.

  7. Seemingly overlooked: Legislative politicians’ growing penchant for putting future spending on autopilot. Automatic increases in gas tax and school funding are high profile examples this session.

    No expenditure of taxpayer money should ever be automatic — at state or federal levels. All public spending should be the result of conscious decisions by elected representatives — decisions for which they must be accountable. Putting spending — and taxation — on autopilot is an abdication of responsibility. No one is accountable (“I didn’t vote for that increase”).

    And when a recession comes along (they always will) … ?

    1. The gas tax should be indexed to the cost of road construction and maintenance. The cost of road graders, plow trucks, asphalt, concrete, re-bar, and labor rise every year. You’d almost think it’s…. automatic.

      1. Even if that “majority” is a single vote (or tie-breaker in the case of the U.S. Senate).

        In today’s hyper-partisan environment — where party loyalty has become the ultimate priority — I personally have a problem with any major legislation passing on a paper-thin straight party-line vote. That’s regardless of which party has the edge.

        In the

  8. This is by far the most complete explanation of transportation taxes I have read. There are most certainly more hidden gems in the fine print and hopefully in the next few months we will find out what they are.
    Kudos to Mn Post journalists, though I don’t agree with wording at times, I think they did an exemplary job while working under numerous deadlines.

Leave a comment