Southwest Light Rail construction on Excelsior Boulevard in Hopkins.
Southwest Light Rail construction on Excelsior Boulevard in Hopkins. Credit: Courtesy of MetroTransit

If you want to understand why Southwest Light Rail is likely delayed several years beyond its last anticipated opening date, make a visit to Park Siding, an obscure park on the extreme western edge of south Minneapolis. There, the sounds of water are everywhere. Water gushing through pipes, water being sucked into other pipes, reminiscent of the sounds in a dentist’s office.

Park Siding Park is named for a railroad siding that once occupied a tiny triangle of land in the shadow of former grain elevators turned into condos. It is hard by miniscule Depot Street, another reminder that the Kenilworth corridor has long been a transitway for trains.

But what’s happening between Park Siding and Depot Street today is construction of a half-mile tunnel that will carry the Metropolitan Council’s Southwest LRT project through a pinch point in its 15-mile path from downtown to Eden Prairie. Complexities with water, underground debris, and construction methods seem poised to push the line’s opening deep into 2025 or 2026.

Ever since word started to leak out last fall that the Kenilworth tunnel construction was stuck in a sloppy mess of water and boulders, contractors and Met Council officials have known the line could not meet its opening estimates, and that tunnel costs could blow through the project’s contingency fund. But the agency insists even today that it cannot estimate the magnitude of delay nor additional cost.

But in midwinter, in a private call with government stakeholders, the Met Council did offer some specificity, TCB has learned. At the time, the project was expected to be delayed by at least two years into late 2025, say individuals on that call, including state Rep. Frank Hornstein (DFL-Minneapolis), who chairs the state House Transportation Committee. Hornstein is a supporter of the project who frames himself as disappointed in its current state.

“We raised questions about all these problem areas. They were waived away. Every dire prediction came true, the ones about cost overruns, the ones about the tunnel, the millions given away to railroads in negotiations,” he said in a spring interview.

Although contaminated soils and a separation wall demanded by adjacent BNSF Railway will add nearly $100 million in overages to the project budget—and take time to respectively remediate and build—it will happen concurrent with tunnel construction, which is the biggest headache.

The Kenilworth Tunnel, long the open wound among neighborhood and environmental activists, has been plagued by what they deem as foreseen challenges—which have forced construction crews to adopt complex and time-consuming fixes to maintain its structural integrity. They include turning to a special method of construction to protect the foundation of the adjacent Calhoun Isles Condos, built in 1928 as grain elevators along the then-Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad.

Specifically, the sheet piling that forms the walls of the tunnel excavation has decoupled once underground due to the presence of boulders and other debris, requiring it be hand-sealed in a time-consuming process that includes divers working under the water table.

The excavation also comes inches from the condominiums, which sit just to the southwest of Park Siding. Given the sheet decoupling elsewhere in the tunnel, a decision was announced in winter to build a drilled concrete (“secant”) retaining wall at the condos instead, which will add additional months and millions to the timeline.

Nearby Minneapolis lakes neighborhood groups long believed the tunneling endangered the condo foundations and portended many other environmental and construction ills, going so far as to file a federal environmental lawsuit, which failed. They were repeatedly assured by the Met Council that the project as designed would be safe and readily buildable.

“They called us NIMBYs, rich people who just wanted not to be bothered,” says Mary Pattock, former chair of the Cedar Isles Dean neighborhood board and longtime critic of the LRT routing. Echoing Rep. Hornstein, she says, “we told them the geology between the lakes was messy. We told them there was not room to build a tunnel safely. We told them you are going to run into problems you are not going to be able to solve. Now it’s all coming true.”

No one at the project level is offering a mea culpa. “I don’t think she’s raising issues that weren’t contemplated,” says Edina Mayor Jim Hovland, who has sat on the project’s Corridor Management Committee since the 2000s, back when the route was still being settled. “We thought about all that stuff. We still think it’s the best route.”

No line would have been free of lawsuits and strife, but it is hard to imagine how a surface route at grade through the Minneapolis Farmer’s Market to Hennepin Avenue to the Midtown Greenway connection with the existing right of way would have been any more difficult.

Pattock wonders, given the pandemic-driven changes in commuting patterns, and the inevitable toll that will take on transit usage, if it’s even justifiable to complete SWLRT. “What are the limits,” she asks, “to what they are willing to pay for a project so deeply troubled?”

The $2 billion project continues to book change orders and eat away at contingency funds. The primary $203 million contingency fund is basically exhausted, according to public documents. An additional $200 million contingency, demanded by federal transit regulators, remains to be tapped. No one is quite clear if that will be enough to deal with the remaining overruns.

SWLRT began initial brush removal and clearing in late 2018, heavy construction and work on the tunnel began in 2019, says the project office. Completion had initially been planned for late 2022 (with public ridership in 2023). As of this writing, the line is 50 percent built, not substantially off that pace, but the Kenilworth tunnel excavation is only 10 to 20 percent complete. And the secant retaining wall has yet to start. It’s difficult then not to infer that the half-mile tunnel may be a five or six-year effort.

The project also recently booked a $9 million change order for up to three years of storage for purchased components, leading to an indication of the measures of delay anticipated.

The neighborhood’s city council member, Lisa Goodman (DFL), who has never supported the Kenilworth routing, is asking for greater transparency. “This is the largest taxpayer funded transit project in our region,” she says. “[Residents] have the right to know how much longer their lives and the neighborhood will be disrupted, what the likely cost overrun is going to be, and when they can expect to see transit service begin.”

A sympathetic voice is Hennepin County Commissioner Debbie Goettel, a civil engineer who represents Bloomington, Richfield, and Eden Prairie, and serves on the line’s Executive Change Control Board (ECCB), which approves each budgetary deviation. She says Hennepin County is pushing back against the Met Council’s penchant for finessing difficult topics, but accepts its rationale that it is impossible to estimate the line’s rough completion date or cost.

Goettel says she is not certain the project can be finished within its remaining contingency dollars, which concerns her because it will be Hennepin County taxpayers making up any overage. There are just too many unresolved factors driving delay and inflating the project’s cost, she says. Goettel is “concerned about transparency. I ask a lot of probing questions.

“Materials are difficult to find right now, and their cost is rising,” she says. Specialists in designing and constructing the tunnel are expensive and hard to schedule. She blames two to three years of initial delay on the Trump Administration, where the project moldered awaiting funding. (Those delays were compounded by the local lawsuit.)

Even other trains are delaying the line. All work needs to stop every time a BNSF freight moves through downtown, which is several times a day, even work on the $93 million, mile-long wall BNSF demanded between its trains and SWLRT’s. Because the wall is much larger than the Met Council anticipated, and will take much longer to build, these delays add up to something quite substantial. Project spokesperson Trevor Roy says he expects wall construction to take almost as long as the tunneling work.

But in the end, Goettel says, stopping remains an absurd prospect, noting that hundreds of millions of dollars of spent federal funds would need to be returned to the U.S. Treasury, not to mention leaving dozens of partially built bridges and other structures scattered across the southwest metro. “It will take years to build transit usage back [from the pandemic],” Goettel admits, “but this will be a very well-utilized line one day.”

Adam Platt has covered Twin Cities LRT development since the 1990s.

 

Join the Conversation

45 Comments

  1. Ultimately, I think it would have been much cheaper and certainly less disruptive to purchase the closest row of low-rise townhouses along the west side of where the tunnel is being constructed… which would have provided enough right of way to have the existing railroad, the Kenilworth Trail, and the LRT tracks all at grade through that half-mile pinch point.

    1. you may be right. I know that option was explored but I can’t remember why it was ruled out. Could be because the owner of those town houses didn’t want to pushed out. One thing about the way this whole project ended up, in theory anyways, was no housing had to be torn down.

      I know that happened here in SLP with the original freight rail design. Most of us didn’t have a problem with it because the original plan just put trains down the existing track more frequently. Then all of the sudden the rail company wanted to double the size of the trains, and increase the speed, and we were looking at 20-30 tear downs, a 20 foot berm, and line running through the middle of our high school football field. That was a good to remember we never actually agreed to this.

      1. Taking down a row of townhomes would cripple the HOA and make the association non-viable. That was one of the considerations. And as you pointed out, one of the principals in creating the line was not to destroy housing.

    1. Thanks Pat, I was going to point this out as well. Last I remember the project was delayed by at least two years not only by failed lawsuits but also Dayton at the time who suddenly demanded yet another study to satisfy his DFL constituents in the area. If I remember correctly those delays cost at least $100 million at the time.

      These folks don’t get any credit for the current scenario because they weren’t demanding more diligence, the were simply trying to block the project. Not only that but one of the objectives was to force a longer deeper tunnel that would likely have faced even bigger obstacles and problems had it been adopted as the plan. You can imagine the problems they would have encountered if they’d tried to dig twice as long of a tunnel under the channel?

      1. Paul, the primary lawsuit filed by the neighborhood was to have a more detailed environmental study because of various changes since the first one was done. The endgame may have been to force a change in the route but the lawsuit concerned an environmental issue. IF the delay cost $100 million it will be a fraction of the delay and extra cost caused by the issues now surfacing.

        For anyone following this project for the last dozen years or so two things were apparent:the pinch point at the Kenilworth corridor was going to be a major challenge and digging a tunnel under the water table between two lakes and vey close to a multistory condo building in a contaminated former rail corridor was going to be a mess. And remember the city of Minneapolis didn’t request this tunnel—it was Gail Dorfman who proposed it at a Corridor Management Committee meeting.

        1. Nonsense. The lawsuit was completely frivolous. If only they could make the neighborhood NIMBYs pay the extra costs.

          1. Sure, it was frivolous. That’s why the issues it raised are causing cost overruns and adding 2 years to the previous start date.

            1. Exactly. It accomplished nothing other than delaying the project and driving up the cost. That’s what frivolous litigation does. And this was as frivolous as it gets. No merit whatsoever. Pure bad faith.

              1. So raising environmental issues in a lawsuit BEFORE construction started was frivolous? Even when those concerns raised in the lawsuit turned out to be real issues? Even now that most of both $200 contingency funds have been drawn to address these issues? Really?

      2. Everything I’ve read over the last few years has said essentially this…. People are not using light rail as projected, and the crime that continues to take place on every line has made it far worse. I took it years ago to go to Lynx games, but we did run into some guys who harassed us. The projected numbers have not materialized. I understand the need to move away from carbon emitting cars, but isn’t there some other way to do this? I just don’t know but this seems like a colossal waste of money.

        1. I’m afraid your readings have failed you. All of the LRT lines met and exceeded ridership projections, as has transit related development along those corridors. Ridership bottomed out during the pandemic, but so did commuting in general.

  2. A tax payer funded transit program over budget and years late….. Who would have guessed that one? Sadly our tax dollars mean very little to the folks in charge of doling it out.

  3. Correct if I’m wrong, but I keep hearing that the tunnel come within inches of the silo/condos… but it’s actually just comes close the parking garage, the condos themselves are quite a bit further away.

    Those bridges their building in Hopkins (the photo is quite old, I have much newer photos) are quite the operation. They are pouring concrete out from the support columns in such a way that it’s balanced on either side without temporary bracing… quite a trick. Maybe this ends up being the strongest bridge you can build, but it’s certainly not the quickest or least expensive way to do it.

    1. Paul, the point is LRT has a fiduciary responsibility to give a report prior to the granting of tax payer dollars, giving estimates on construction cost and time. On a private job, the engineers would be fired for this travesty, what will happen to the civil engineers for this boondoggle?

      1. Joe, no… that’s actually not the point. And abandoned private projects like those sprinkled all over the state are not a feature of private sector efficiency, they’re costly failures that leave communities and neighborhoods in crises.

        1. Paul. If the private sector screwed up this bad, they would be out of business in a heartbeat. Please show me private sector projects that are constantly 10’s of millions over bid and years late…. Those private businesses do not exist because you GO BROKE and are out of business. Government never goes broke, more tax dollars coming yearly ad in levees, state bonds and special spending….. Endless supply of tax payer dollars. The reason this happens over and over and over again with tax dollar projects is no accountability and certain citizens accepting plus defending the reckless spending.

          1. “Please show me private sector projects that are constantly 10’s of millions over bid and years late”

            American Dream is a retail and entertainment complex in the Meadowlands Sports Complex in East Rutherford, New Jersey

            That Mall of America thing they did before this one has worked out I hear…

            1. As I stated there are bad private businesses too, good news is they go out of business quickly. Government is steady over budget and late on projects, they just get more tax dollars. I and most folks who understand business will take private over Government projects every time. Unfortunately for us tax payers we put in lawmakers that have no business sense and fall for every project that can be peddled to the public easily. This is exactly how LRT is in the situation they are in.

              1. Joe, government isn’t a business… again you need to study up the economic differences between private sector and public sector activity. You’re comparing apples and oranges, you’re expecting the public sector to conform to private sector expectations. The public sector is non-profit… of course it doesn’t make a profit.

                I know there are people who simply don’t believe the public sector should exist… they think EVERYHING should be done for profit… but thousands of years of human experience with civilization have shown us that some things work well in one sector, and not in the other.

    2. Take a trip over to the Calhoun-Isles condominiums and check out the site. The shorter of the two silos is very close to rail line. It isn’t just the parking garage. And, you could feel vibrations from trains on the old Milwaukee Road line which is now the Greenway when trains still ran there. I lived in the Calhoun building (the taller of the two silos) from the opening of the condos in 1982 to 1990.

      1. I did take a walk/bike over there before the construction began… I didn’t see any condos mere inches away from the tracks or tunnel. I assume you chose to live there when you felt the vibrations?

  4. Remember when anyone that had questions or doubts of these issues was just poo-poo’ed and they just pushed this thing through?

      1. The North Star was designed to fail from the start by people who always doubted it could be successful. Of course no one wants to ride a train that doesn’t run all day and doesn’t even travel to its promised destination.

        It’s like if you built a freeway to Saint Cloud didn’t actually go that far and stopped outside city limits, and this roadway only let you travel in one direction in the morning, the other direction in the evening, and it closed entirely during the middle of the day.

        Run trains every twenty minutes all day in BOTH directions and finish the leg to Saint Cloud, you’d see a significant increase in ridership. Because then it would actually be useful to more people.

        I’ve always wanted to see Anoka’s Halloween festival. Too bad the North Star can’t actually take me there, despite my home being close to Target Field Station and the festival being near Anoka Station, because the people in charge don’t see the value in offering that level of service operations.

        1. Yeah, Republicans couldn’t kill the line altogether so they just made as unviable as they could.

    1. No, I remember several lawsuits, and years of delays while concerns were addressed.

  5. An interesting note on the SW LRT is that this is the first MN LRT project with a bunch of commuters at one end and employers at the other end. The Hiawatha line was essentially Jesse paying back his old neighborhood with a revitalization project. The Midway line connects the two cities and makes sense based on that. This one finally gets at what Chicago and NYC have long had: a viable commuting solution. Or you could just accept the Center for the American Experiment solution and just wait for the teleporters.

    1. Thanks Edward… the idea of connecting employers in one part of the metro with workers in another via affordable transportation simply escapes those consider anything other than more lanes for cars and trucks to be “boondoggles”.

    2. “The Hiawatha line was essentially Jesse paying back his old neighborhood with a revitalization project.”

      Well, no. The Hiawatha Line was discussed when Jesse Ventura was still flaunting his boa on TV. The reason the Hiawatha Line was built first is that the land had been acquired years before, for a poorly thought out plan to turn Hiawatha Avenue into a controlled access freeway. Widespread opposition to a freeway through Minnehaha Park caused rethinking of that plan.

      The project came to fruition under Ventura, but was actually pushed through the process by Arne Carlson (who also lived in that area for a time).

      1. And Jesse’s old neighborhood was up in the other direction, Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove.

        1. Insofar as he ever grew up, it was in south Minneapolis. Jesse is now the most famous graduate of Roosevelt High School (pushing aside that little nerd who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry).

          1. OK, but SWLR runs through the Kenwood neighborhood… we’re still off from Ventura’s roots by a few miles eh?

    3. The SW LRT has a bunch of commuters at each end (and all along the line) and employers at each end. Both downtown Minneapolis and the SW suburbs have a huge number of employers and jobs. Employees live all along the line. The reverse commute is not so reverse anymore.

  6. Just to get back to something Joe said about the private sector… the idea there’s more accountability, people would lose their jobs etc. etc. Bushwa!

    Anyone who pays attention to the private or works in it can give you multiple examples incompetents rising thought the ranks rather than ending up out on their butts. And the higher you are in the executive structure the more protected you are, even if you get fired. How many times do we see multi million dollar executives leave with huge bonuses even when they get forced out? And how many times do you mediocre executives simply bounce from one corporate office to another? Executives in the private sector are far less accountable than their counterparts in the public sector. There are no golden parachutes for failed executives in the public sector.

    This libertarian myth of meritocracy wherein only the best of the best survive in the private sector is simply fantasy pretending to natural law.

    1. Meritocracy
      Political ideology
      Meritocracy is a political system in which economic goods and/or political power are vested in individual people on the basis of talent, effort, and achievement, rather than wealth or social class. Advancement in such a system is based on performance, as measured through examination or demonstrated achievement. Wikipedia

      Oligarchy
      Form of government
      Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as nobility, fame, wealth, education, corporate, religious, political, or military control. Wikipedia

  7. This is a perfect example of politicians making decisions for something they know nothing about. Kudos!!

Leave a comment