Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate
This coverage is made possible by a grant from The Saint Paul Foundation.

Minneapolis redistricting group signs off on tentative new wards

With its latest revisions complete, the Minneapolis Redistricting Group is ready to present its proposed ward maps for public input.

To view the proposed map for all 13 city wards, go here (PDF).  To view maps of the individual wards, go here (PDF).

Here’s a look at some of the latest changes:

The Somali and East African immigrants would get a ward where a majority of its residents are minority members, but in the process, the redistricting commission’s proposed plans end up splitting the Somali community between two wards.

The new Ward 6 would have a population that is nearly 34 percent black and 20 percent Hispanic. The ward would include the western end of the Cedar-Riverside Neighborhood, which is home to many from Somalia and East Africa, but does not include the eastern end of the neighborhood or the area just south of Interstate 94 that has many African residents.

Members of the Redistricting Group are eager to create a second city ward that has a majority of minority residents to increase the chances of minority representation on the City Council.

“I would put before you that the characteristics of the Minneapolis population have changed quite a bit,” said Hazel Reinhardt, a demographer hired by the Citizens Committee for Fair Redistricting, which represents residents from Somalia and East Africa.

“The new realities are not going to take us back to where we were,” said Reinhardt, who worked with the African group to create their own version of a new Ward 6.

Ward 6 is currently represented by Robert Lilligren, one of two minority members serving on the Council.  He is an American Indian. Ward 6 does not currently have a minority majority. Ward 5, with a majority of black residents, is represented by Don Samuels, who is black.

Members of the Redistricting Group listened to suggestions about how the African community could be kept together in one ward but decided to keep the boundaries as they are for now to give the community at large two weeks to study the new maps before two upcoming public hearings.

Anticipating that the public hearings will produce more requests for changes, they decided to get more input before moving any more lines. They also acknowledged that the new legislative districts maps — due out Tuesday — could also dictate the need to change ward boundaries.

The group also spent several hours moving lines on the city’s proposed 13 ward maps. They started by moving the proposed line between Ward 1 and Ward 3 in northeast Minneapolis.  They also moved the lines between Ward 5, which is north Minneapolis, and Ward 7, which includes half of downtown and the neighborhoods around Cedar Lake and Lake of the Isles.

They debated using major streets as ward dividing lines. They noted that even though streets are natural boundaries, using them for boundaries can end up splitting neighborhoods and business districts.  They also suggested that splitting groups into two wards could give them two advocates on the council instead of one.

 Commission members discovered the reality that adding needed population to one ward can reduce the population in neighboring wards. To that end, they worked their way down the eastern border of the city adding and subtracting people and then worked their way back up the eastern border undoing what they had just done.

“It’s the cascade effect,” said commission member Andy Kozak, a veteran of redistricting efforts.

Trying to fine-tune the maps, they also adjusted the lines around Lakewood Cemetery and the Rose Garden, even though no one lives.

Redistricting Public Hearings

Two hearing to get public input on city redistricting have been scheduled:

Feb. 29: 5 to 7 p.m., Webber Community Center, 4400 Dupont Ave. N.

March 1: 5 to 7 p.m., Hosem Community Library, 347 E. 36th St.

Two Cities blog, which covers Minneapolis and St. Paul City Halls, is made possible in part by grants from The Saint Paul Foundation and the Carolyn Foundation.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Connie Sullivan on 02/17/2012 - 01:14 pm.

    redistricting wards

    This article would have been more helpful if it had given readers some idea of what the February 15 changes were, then which of those changes were changed back again. Detail, in other words, instead of a TV-style “sound-byte” generalization.

    For example, those who live on the East Side of Minneapolis might like to know how the northern part of the current Ward 2 fared at the 2/15 redistricting meeting, versus the riverine neighborhoods in south Minneapolis, beginning with Cedar-Riverside. What lines were moved, then moved back?

    As it is, all we know of what the Commission thinks is that they are holding back on anything significant in eastern wards’ changes until they hear from people on. . . nothing changed 2/15!

    Can you see the frustration of those who were not present at that meeting, in not knowing the thinking of the people who will be deciding?

  2. Submitted by Neal Krasnoff on 02/17/2012 - 05:23 pm.

    Minority District

    Translated: affirmative action.

  3. Submitted by Vic Thorstenson on 02/19/2012 - 08:51 am.

    This map can be improved

    I drew up my own proposal, which you can find here: http://bit.ly/xADITs

    It’s much more compact – in fact, it uses ten miles less border than the city’s draft map. It also creates wards that more closely reflects Minneapolis’s total minority population, creates a true downtown ward, and is far closer in population deviation.

    The one factor I didn’t consider – or even much care about – is where current council members live.

    Let me know what you think!

Leave a Reply