Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Minnesota must do more to address childhood obesity

Kari Winning

In 2016, 27.7 percent of children in Minnesota ages 10 to 17 were considered overweight or obese. Those children face a higher risk of serious health conditions, including hypertension, hyperlipidemis, type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, depression, anxiety, osteoarthritis, and some cancers. This is not a problem that arose overnight. Between 1980 and 2008, the number of overweight children in Minnesota more than tripled

With more than a quarter of Minnesota’s children having a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 85th percentile, one might ask what the future looks like. The majority of overweight children will be overweight or obese in adulthood. Most of the children already suffering will struggle their entire lives with obesity and the havoc it wreaks on their bodies. The impact is not only felt by those with personal struggles but also by family members who love and care for them. 

A costly collective struggle

It is also a costly struggle for everyone. Collectively, the total estimated financial costs of obesity in Minnesota were estimated to be $2.8 billion in 2006, a number that undoubtedly grows as health costs increase along with the obesity rates. 

How could we have let this happen?  With such a significant impact on our children, the health of all Minnesotans, the quality of our workforce, and the financial burden to everyone, how could Minnesotans have allowed the childhood obesity problem to escalate to this level of severity?  The answer is simple: Minnesotans everywhere did very little, and in so doing, failed our children. The only step Minnesota has taken is the Safe Routes to School grant program, which aims at making it easier for kids to walk or bike to school. While this is a start, it is a small one and ignores the larger causes of childhood obesity.

While there was an effort made to address childhood obesity at the state legislative level with the formation of a Childhood Obesity Legislative Working Group, that group was an informal legislative group that met only four times during the fall of 2009 and the winter of 2010. The result of that group was to recommend the creation and funding of a Safe Routes to School grant program that would make it easier and safer for children to walk and bike to school, which recommendation was enacted by the state Legislature. Unfortunately, the group has not been active for approximately eight years and little has been done since that time to address childhood obesity. While their work has been a step in the right direction, it has ignored many of the causes of childhood obesity.

A need for state commitment

The causes of childhood obesity are relatively simple to identify: poor diet, lack of adequate sleep, a sedentary lifestyle, and lack of family and community support. Unlike other public health crises, childhood obesity could easily be addressed with a commitment to the cause by the state Legislature and the Department of Health. This is a struggle for which we already have the answer key. All of the causes must be addressed in order to reduce the rates of childhood obesity and to improve the lives of Minnesota’s children.

Steps must be taken toward increasing physical activity, and educating about the importance of a healthy diet is necessary to address the childhood obesity problem Minnesota is currently facing. To that end, the legislative working committee should be reinstated to address all causes of this crisis and remain committed to its mission until we see a real change in the numbers and in our children.

Kari Winning is an attorney and is also pursuing a master’s degree in health care administration at the University of Minnesota.


If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see our Submission Guidelines.)

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Jim Bernstein on 05/04/2018 - 04:35 pm.

    Why Always Blame Government?

    Let’s start pointing the finger at the health care profession which loves to study weight related issues but lack the will and resources to do much about them and the health insurance/HMO industry which refuses to help many who are seeking help with weight issues. For both health care providers and the insurers, if one is bulimic or anorexic you have a medical problem and we will help you but if you are overweight, you are just too lazy or undisciplined so its bariatric surgery or else.

  2. Submitted by Paul Yochim on 05/05/2018 - 07:15 am.

    Better yet,

    let’s point the finger and assign blame exactly where it belongs, the parents. Many times the parents are obese as well and that is all the child knows.

  3. Submitted by Misty Martin on 05/07/2018 - 10:50 am.

    It’s more than parents who are blame for this epidemic.

    Under President Obama’s presidency, the first lady, Michelle Obama, tried to get public schools to address this problem by providing healthier school lunches for the students, but many of the students rejected this plan, claiming to not be getting enough calories to keep them from feeling hunger pains. Poor eating habits are certainly a learned behavior as are sedentary lifestyles (video games, too much television, lack of outdoor activities and sports, etc.) HOWEVER, we must consider the monetary cost of healthier food options as well.

    Have you ever tried to buy fish and fresh fruits and vegetables while existing on a minimum wage
    income or a fixed income? Pretty pricey. Some of the unhealthier options must simply be chosen if the rent/mortgage payments, utilities, car payment/repairs, insurance, etc., are to be met each month.
    And we’ve all read those horrifying stories where public school employees are told to “dump” a child’s lunch into the garbage, rather than let a child eat a lunch if their school lunch bill is in arrears. That makes no sense to me whatsoever. If the food is going to be wasted ANYWAY, what is the harm in feeding a hungry child? Does it help anyone to embarrass the child, whose fault it is most certainly NOT anyway, and make him/her eat a peanut butter sandwich at the additional cost of $1?

    I believe a lot of funds could be allocated for feeding our children, but then some politicians might have to forego future raises, extravagant spending on unnecessary expenditures, case in point: HUD secretary, Ben Carson’s $31,561 purchase of new furniture for his executive dining room, while proposing to triple the rent for some of the poorest households receiving household assistance. I admire the way Whoopi Goldberg addressed this issue recently on “The View”, admonishing Mr. Carson to “do his homework” before trying to get this proposal of rent increases passed.

    It’s easy enough to pass judgment when you are standing in the opposite position of the one you are judging – it’s much harder to put on another’s shoes and actually walk in them.

Leave a Reply