Expect $1 billion price tag for Bottineau LRT to go up, says project director

MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan
Dan Soler: "The main message that we’d like to get across … is we are at a very early stage, that the dollar amount that’s been set for the estimated cost of the project is based on a very preliminary identification of risks and scope items."

The project director for the planned extension of the Blue Line light rail, from Target Field to Brooklyn Park, had a not-so-subtle message for the members of a Metropolitan Council committee Monday: The $1 billion price tag is certain to go up.

During a bus tour of the proposed route — which doubled as a meeting of the council’s transportation committee — Dan Soler repeatedly pointed out all the ways that the current estimate will grow. That amount was placed on the project last summer when the engineering was at the 1 percent level, and is certain to look different when the staff presents an updated figure at the end of the year. That’s when engineering for the project will be at 15 percent.

And the estimate might be different again when the engineering reaches 30 percent next summer.

“The main message that we’d like to get across … is we are at a very early stage, that the dollar amount that’s been set for the estimated cost of the project is based on a very preliminary identification of risks and scope items, and as we continue to develop this we’ll continue to update those,” Soler told council members before they boarded the bus. Soler said he would use the tour to identify “this is stuff that’s in the current scope and here’s some of the stuff that’s not.”

Cost will depend on a familiar set of questions

For example, the current project description calls for a station at either Golden Valley Road or Plymouth Avenue. But both Minneapolis and Golden Valley would like stations at both locations. Adding a station at Plymouth Avenue, which would require stairs and elevators to move passengers down the tracks, would trigger rebuilding the roadway above to clear the way for both freight and light rail tracks. The plan for the Golden Valley Road station does not include park and ride facilities, but the city of Golden Valley wants them added, Soler said.

And while Met Council staff has been talking to BNSF about buying half of the company’s 100-foot-wide right of way between Golden Valley and Brooklyn Park, it is far from having a dollar amount set. That is critical because eight miles of the 13-mile alignment will share the rail right-of-way. Securing the deal will necessitate shifting the freight tracks to one side and making other improvements that the railroad will demand.

The Blue Line Extension will also face the costs of unknowns that are now familiar to those following the budget travails of the Southwest LRT project: the potential for poor soil conditions, environmental contamination, wetlands and floodplain, park impacts. One example of that was apparent during the tour when the bus stopped on the Olson Highway bridge as it passed over the tracks. Just east of the right-of-way are wetlands that will likely require bridges on pilings to support tracks.

If there is good news, it is that the current estimate has a 34 percent contingency — the share of the $1 billion not yet devoted to specific project costs. The closer the project gets to construction and the more detail designers and engineers have in hand, the less the federal government requires be held in reserve as contingency.

Courtesy of the Metropolitan Council
State funding remains unpredictable 

The Blue Line Extension, also known as Bottineau, would be the fourth major light rail line in the region (though, because of delays in the Southwest LRT project, it is only a year behind the Green Line extension.) It will travel from the Target Field station to Brooklyn Park via Minneapolis, Golden Valley, Robbinsdale and Crystal. Construction is set for between 2018 and 2020 with passenger operations set to begin in 2021. Ridership estimates by 2030 is 27,000 per weekday.

The route contains three distinct segments. After it leaves Target Field, it moves down the median of Olson Memorial Highway. At the border of Minneapolis and Golden Valley, just west of Wirth Lake, the tracks will swing down to the BNSF freight rail corridor. The line then leaves the corridor at 73rd Avenue North and swings east, where it will share West Broadway until passing over HW 610 on a new rail bridge before terminating near the Target’s North Campus.

Funding is similar to the plan for Southwest LRT, with one small but significant exception. With Southwest, the federal government will be asked for 50 percent of the cost, with the Counties Transportation Improvement Board (CTIB) paying 30 percent and the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority and the state paying 10 percent each. In the Blue Line Extension, the feds will be asked for 49 percent with the CTIB paying 31 percent. That 1 percent shift is the result of recent changes in federal funding policies that give priority to projects that have a majority of funding from nonfederal sources.

Bottineau will have one funding issue in common with Southwest LRT, however. The state share — $166 million with Southwest and currently $100 million with Bottineau — is uncertain at best. Majority House Republicans have stated they don’t favor additional light rail construction and have not yet offered any money for the Green Line extension.

Transit advocates have been pushing Gov. Mark Dayton’s proposal to add to the quarter-cent  five-county sales tax now administered by CTIB. The additional half cent would shift the state’s 10 percent share of the projects to the region. That plan also was not accepted by the House GOP.


Bottineau Transitway alignment simulation video

Will people sue? 

The ongoing political, environmental and funding issues facing the Southwest LRT project were on the minds of some of the council members Monday. While passing through a leafy, suburban street that abuts the rail corridor, Council Member Jennifer Munt of Minnetonka asked Soler, “Is this another Kenilworth? Where people will sue?” That refers to the federal litigation filed by residents who don’t want the existing rail corridor through the Kenilworth Corridor near their homes to be used for both freight trains and light rail.

“I’m not getting that vibe right now,” Soler said.

Another budget risk is any political decisions to change how the light rail line transitions from the freight tracks to the surface streets near 73rd Avenue in Brooklyn Park. Currently the plan is for tracks to pass through a complex intersection at grade, with signals controlling car traffic and light rail. But Soler said Met Council leadership thinks the conflicts might be too much, and are suggesting a bridge over Bottineau Boulevard on its way to West Broadway.

The alignment has been adjusted here to avoid having to purchase houses that line the street. “We’re not going to buy any homes, but we’re going to get close to some,” Soler said.

Why use W. Broadway at all when the BNSF tracks continue north? Soler said planners and politicians want the light rail to pass near Hennepin Community College, a new county library and end nearer the Target Campus, which he said has vast vacant land with development potential. The company owns much of the land around the terminus, and has discussed expanding its campus, providing space for other companies, building housing and some retail, Soler said.

Soler was the director of construction on the Central Corridor project, the current Green Line between downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. His deputy project director, Mary Sue Abel, also worked on the Green Line. The project scope and budget will be updated in time for the beginning of the municipal consent process in December. The budget and scope will be updated again next summer to allow the project apply to the FTA for permission  to move into the engineering phase.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Sean Fahey on 07/28/2015 - 01:38 pm.

    Rushing Municipal Consent

    Despite all of the unknowns, the Met Council has pushed up the schedule for municipal consent from the cities along the route. At only 15% design completion, cities are expected to commit to this project. [1]

    Would anyone ever sign onto a project with only 15% of the information, knowing that the process will reveal more issues? We should at least have all of the facts. Let the engineering and budget get sorted out first. That will decrease the risk of a lawsuit and political embarrassment in the future.

    [1] http://www.metrocouncil.org/getdoc/755cdc19-401a-48db-ba67-aba8d9b1abdb/Presentation.aspx slides 35, 36

    • Submitted by Dan Berg on 07/28/2015 - 03:54 pm.

      Political Project

      These projects are political an nature and have nothing to do with good design of transportation systems so the fact there is only 15% of the design complete is really beside the point.

  2. Submitted by Gail O'Hare on 07/28/2015 - 06:26 pm.

    Old streetcar lines

    Take a look at maps of the old lines before they ripped them out. Some are here:
    http://www.trolleyride.org/History/PDFs/TCRT_Mpls_map_1946.pdf

    With far fewer people, the old system was much more complete and accessible than these LRT boondoggles can possibly recreate. We need fuel efficient buses, flexible jitney service like Metro Mobility but for everyone who isn’t near main routes – in short, we need genuine creativity and futuristic thinking. We do not need fixed rail. Period.

  3. Submitted by Madge Thorsen on 08/17/2015 - 01:00 pm.

    People will sue

    Hard to believe that Mr. Soler is not “getting the vibe” of potential lawsuits related to Bottineau, since I myself have tried very hard to send them, including in lengthy comments at public meetings and on the DEIS! Alignment D-1 is the “leafy” area referred to and is in fact acres of natural parklands which the LRT will turn into rail yards (two LRT tracks, one BNSF track and a service road with all the overhead catenaries and maintenance buildings will replace deer, fox, ducks, geese, birds, opposum, greenery, trails, and natural peace and quiet). I am not an environmental lawyer but am a lawyer and I believe the current plan violates federal law protecting parks and will do monetary damage to hundreds of homes due to noise, vibration and air pollution. Lawsuits are inevitable.

Leave a Reply