Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

UCare generously supports MinnPost’s Second Opinion coverage; learn why.

Minnesota’s adult obesity rate is 30.1%, up from 28.4%

Minnesota’s adult obesity rate is 30.1 percent, up from 28.4 percent the previous year, according to the 16th annual State of Obesity report released on Thursday by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).

That rate means Minnesota is now ranked 30th — along with South Dakota — for adult obesity among all 50 states and the District of Columbia. That’s five slots higher than in last year’s report.

The national adult obesity rate is 30.9 percent, the report says. Colorado has the lowest rate (23 percent), while Mississippi and West Virginia have the highest (39.5 percent).

Just seven years ago, no state had an adult obesity rate above 35 percent. Now, nine states do.


“These latest data shout that our national obesity crisis is getting worse,” said John Auerbach, TFAH’s president and CEO, in a released statement. “They tell us that almost 50 years into the upward curve of obesity rates we haven’t yet found the right mix of programs to stop the epidemic.”

“Isolated programs and calls for life-style changes aren’t enough,” he adds. “Instead, our report highlights the fundamental changes that are needed in the social and economic conditions that make it challenging for people to eat healthy foods and get sufficient exercise.”

2018 adult obesity rates

The State of Obesity report, which is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is based on TFAH’s analysis of the latest data from two federal sources: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2018 state data) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2016 national data).

A major health problem

The obesity epidemic is an urgent public health problem. Obesity takes a huge toll on individual lives, as well as on the U.S. and state-level economies.

People with obesity are at increased risk for many health problems, including high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, certain cancers (including breast, colon and kidney), osteoarthritis and clinical depression.

Obesity is estimated to cost the U.S. economy at least $149 billion each year in increased medical expenses — half of which is paid for by Medicare and Medicaid. Minnesota’s obesity-related health care costs are estimated at $3.2 billion annually.

This year’s State of Obesity report focuses on how obesity levels are closely linked to social and economic conditions:

While obesity affects all populations, obesity rates are higher in certain populations where social and economic conditions contribute to persistent health inequities — almost half of Latino (47 percent) and Black (46.8 percent) adults had obesity in 2015-2016, which is 24 percent higher than Whites (37.9 percent). …

Currently too many Americans, particularly those who live in poverty and/or face racism and other forms of discrimination, face barriers to healthy behavior. All Americans — no matter where they live, how much money they make or what their racial or ethnic background is — must be able to make healthy choices for themselves and their families, and communities must support them in doing so through innovative programs and services.


Policies that work

The report points to two policies that have been shown to be effective in reducing obesity rates.

One is the creation of healthier food packages for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), a federal assistance program for low-income pregnant and breastfeeding women and children under the age of 5.  The new food packages, which were introduced in 2009, are better aligned than past ones with recommended dietary guidelines and, thus, contain more fruits, vegetables and whole grains.

“Program data released in 2019 show a steady decline in obesity rates for children ages 2 to 4 enrolled in the program between 2010 and 2016 (from 15.9 percent to 13.9 percent), [and] two other 2019 studies also found benefits among enrollees,” the report notes.

The other policy that appears to be effective — at least, in reducing people’s consumption of added sugar — is the increasing of taxes on sugary drinks. Such taxes have been shown to change consumer behavior, as evidenced by what happened in Philadelphia, the largest municipality to date to enact a beverage tax — a raise of 1.5 cents per ounce on all sugary drinks in 2017.

“New research on the first year of the tax found that consumers in the city purchased fewer sugary drinks on average, and retailers stocked more bottled water and less soda,” the report explains. “The effect on consumers was not uniform, rather it tended to primarily affect those who drank higher amounts of soda. This includes declines in total sugar consumption among children who drank more sugary drinks before the tax went into effect.”

The frequent consumption of sugary beverages, such as sodas, sports drinks, energy drinks and sweetened teas, is considered a major factor behind the obesity epidemic, both globally and here in the United States.

“Policies such as these are proving effective in changing behavior,” said Auerbach. “But, no single solution — however promising — is sufficient. Obesity is a complex problem and will need multi-sector, multi-factor solutions.”


Policy recommendations

The report includes a long list of policy recommendations for federal, state and local governments, including expanding efforts to increase the price of sugary drinks through excise taxes and making access to nutritious food a core tenet of all anti-hunger and nutrition-assistance programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Here are some additional recommendations in the report:

  • Make it more difficult to market unhealthy food to children by ending federal tax loopholes and business costs deductions related to the advertising of such foods to young audiences.
  • Fully fund the Student Support and Academic Enrichment program and other federal programs that support student physical education.
  • Encourage safe physical activity by funding Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS), Complete Streets, Vision Zero and other pedestrian safety initiatives through federal transportation and infrastructure funding.
  • Strengthen and expand school nutrition programs beyond federal standards to include universal meals, flexible breakfasts and eliminate all unhealthy food marketing to students.
  • Enforce existing laws that direct most health insurers to cover obesity-related preventive services at no-cost sharing to patients.

Solutions must address structural causes

This year’s “State of Obesity” report includes an interview with Xavier Morales, executive director of the Praxis Project, a national nonprofit organization that works to advance health justice and racial equity. When asked what was the single most important policy action that needs to be taken to address obesity, Morales emphasized the need for more structural change.

“We need to be more intentional to ensure that investments are changing the underlying structures that promote health inequities and obesity,” he said. “The way we are currently approaching the obesity epidemic — in silos and with national campaigns/priorities that may not fit all local complexities, resources, and priorities — is creating “solutions” that often don’t address the structural causes of obesity.”

“As I work across professional and organic public health, I feel we have reached the limits of what professional public health alone can do going up against powerful moneyed interests,” he added. “We have to bring in the rest of the team (organic public health) in a manner that is authentic, dignified, equitably valued, and funded. The power of those profiting from the obesity epidemic is immense. Our public health solutions need to be equally powerful.”

FMI: There is a link to the full report on TFAH’s website.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Robert Gauthier on 09/12/2019 - 09:59 am.

    When you get outside of the metro area, the incidence of obesity is really staggering. Are used to be that 300 pounds was heavy, now it’s 350 to 400 pounds. Add to that drug and alcohol abuse and you have some very expensive future medical consumers. And many of them smoke!

  2. Submitted by Andy Briebart on 09/12/2019 - 11:29 am.

    Just wait until we legalize pot.

  3. Submitted by joe smith on 09/12/2019 - 11:49 am.

    High sugar, processed food with no exercise = fat people. Low sugar non processed food with exercise = good shape. Your choice! I like the fact that folks think the Federal Government can mandate health. It is a personal choice that folks either will or will not follow.
    The let’s do something even if it doesn’t work and costs taxpayers billions idea is worse than doing nothing…. Doing nothing is free.

  4. Submitted by Alan Straka on 09/12/2019 - 02:06 pm.

    If sugary drinks are such a problem and if the poor suffer more from obesity then why do we allow food stamps to be used to purchase such items? It is time to put restrictions on food stamp eligible items. That goes for other calorie dense, nutrient poor items. No more junk food. It is also time we stop subsidizing those agricultural products that are the major contributors to the obesity epidemic. The worst culprits are the ones who benefit most from subsidies, corn, wheat, soy beans, and worst of all, sugar. Fruits and vegetables are ineligible for federal subsidies. Where the hell are our priorities?

Leave a Reply