Capitol staffers preparing the Minnesota Senate chambers on Monday.
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan[/image_credit][image_caption]The state Senate now appears to be beyond the DFL’s reach.[/image_caption]
It was one of the top three 2020 election goals for the DFL, and millions of dollars were raised and spent to accomplish it: to take control of the Minnesota Senate from Republicans and create a Democratic governing trifecta: governor-House-Senate.

The party’s other two goals — to continue its dominance in delivering the state for the Democratic presidential candidate and re-electing U.S. Sen. Tina Smith — were met. But the state Senate now appears to be beyond the DFL’s reach.

For two more years, Minnesota likely will have the distinction of having the only divided Legislature in America. Despite being happy with the recruitment of challengers, despite out-fundraising the GOP and its interest groups two-to-one, and despite attracting attention from national activists, the DFL will remain in the Senate minority. The margin could be a single seat.

The 2021 Legislature is now likely to convene with a 34-33 GOP majority or a 35-32 majority, the same advantage Republicans had when this election began. The House DFL will retain its majority but at a reduced level from the 75-59 spread with which it started the year. 

House Minority Leader Kurt Daudt said Wednesday the best-case scenario, based on current results, is a 69-65 DFL majority come January, with the House GOP successfully defending all of its incumbents and open seats that had been held by Republicans. Some in the GOP now believe they can skim away a few DFLers to overturn Gov. Tim Walz’s emergency declarations.

State Sen. Warren Limmer
[image_caption]State Sen. Warren Limmer[/image_caption]
The situation is the result of a hoped-for blue wave by the DFL that did not materialize beneath the Biden and Smith victories. In fact, there is evidence that voters split tickets in critical races around the state. In what was perhaps the DFL’s No. 1 target for defeat — Senate Judiciary Chair Warren Limmer, in District 34 — Limmer has a tight but likely sustainable 2 percent edge. Yet Biden beat Donald Trump in the Maple Grove district by 8 points. In Rochester’s District 26, GOP incumbent Carla Nelson is up 51-49 over DFLer Aleta Borrud while Biden carried the district with 53.5 percent. In the east metro’s Senate District 39, Karin Housley is fending off an expensive challenge from Josiah Hill; Biden narrowly carried the district.

Even where the DFL managed to flip a seat — as it did in Burnsville’s Senate District 56 — Lindsey Port’s defeat of GOP incumbent Dan Hall came with 53 percent of the vote, while Biden won the district with 55.6 percent. 

One issue that was raised during the election — the legitimacy of marijuana legalization party candidates in battleground Senate races — is taking on new importance. In two cases, Jaden Partlow in Senate District 14 and Tyler Becvar in Senate District 27 are capturing enough votes that the DFL candidate would be winning had they gotten most of those votes. Both Partlow and Becvar were endorsed by Legal Marijuana Now, but Becvar has been accused of having marginal connections to the legalization movement and strong ties to the GOP.  

Day-after press releases from national party organizations show how the split decision is being spun.

“RSLC Applauds Republicans on Holding Majority in Minnesota Senate,” read a statement from the Republican State Leadership Committee.

“Breaking: Democrats Defend Minnesota House Majority,” wrote the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee.

Both bragged about their spending in the state and even cited the same issue, public safety, as significant in the outcome. Even though legislative DFLers were careful to distance themselves from Minneapolis City Council efforts to reallocate public safety spending to non-police responses, many DFL candidates faced a barrage of mailers and digital ads accusing them of wanting to “defund” the police.

Through Oct. 19, the latest reporting date to the state Campaign Finance Board, DFL-affiliated independent expenditure committees and political funds spent $24 million, with two-thirds of that going to Senate races. That number will certainly go up once the final reports come in in January.

The national parties were interested in the Minnesota Legislature mostly because the Senate was so closely held. Flipping it would give DFLers complete control over post-Census redistricting, a process that will be even more stressful next year because of the likely loss of one of Minnesota’s congressional districts due to reapportionment.

The divide suggests the Legislature and Gov. Tim Walz will not be able to reach a deal on redistricting, turning it over to the courts for the fifth consecutive time or perhaps reach a compromise on a commission, as 14 states have done.

But DFL-leaning activists will be more disappointed because the split Legislature means legislation they favor will again languish in the Senate. Limmer, for example, stopped bills aimed at legalizing recreational use of marijuana and to allow those with felony convictions to vote after they leave prison rather than when their supervision expires. 

The lack of big shifts was the common storyline not just in Minnesota but across the country. With both parties trying to swing state chambers in advance of redistricting, the seeming draw is a win for the GOP. Governing Magazine reports that Republicans entered the year with 59 of the 99 state legislative chambers and picked up two more — the House and Senate of New Hampshire. And election eve dreams of gaining ground in Texas, Iowa, Michigan and North Carolina were not realized. 

If there is any consolation for the DFL, because of redistricting it will get another chance in two years, when all 134 House seats and all 67 Senate seats will again be on the ballot.

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. The significance of Minnesota having the only (current) split legislature in the nation has been overblown. (Historically 3-4 have had legislative house splits in recent years.)
    Governments in 49 states (Nebraska’s unicameral legislature is the exception) aren’t “two-legged stools.” There is a vital “third leg” – control of the governor’s office. It does a political party little good to control both legislative houses if the governor is of the opposite party. After Tuesday’s elections, 11 states had “split” governments (two others still in question). It is only significant if one party has a “trifecta” – control of both legislative houses and the governor’s office. There are 37 states currently with one-party control of government (22 Republican, 15 Democratic) plus the 11 split and two still in question.

    1. The Republicans have considerable power in their perpetual obstruction and refusal to compromise on anything.

      The article points out their new wish to gain a couple Dem seats, simply to force the governor to release COVID in hopes of making more money for the businesses that spread the virus.

      It would never occur to them to try to use state government to help those very businesses.

      Pretending the neighboring states who are doing Republican virus management are not raging centers of infection and full hospital beds and exhausted medical workers is DELUSIONAL.

      Legislators should make their plans with Mike Osterholm’s guidance, not Republican legislators.

      (Thanks Tim Walz for trying to keep us all safe.)

      1. Where has the Governor been in the last few weeks as Metro hospitals are at 98% ICU capacity?

        Osterholm said that all we needed was a six week complete hard shutdown and everything would be good. Look at Italy, France, the U.K. , who did that, and where they are now? The virus will not go away until there is a vaccine (and people take it) and this will take months, well into 2022. Are we prepare to shut down all business until then?

      2. “The Republicans have considerable power in their perpetual obstruction and refusal to compromise on anything.”

        Or perhaps, they want to have a chance to represent their constituents outside of Emergency powers that shut them out.

        1. They’ve demonstrated for former, the latter not so much.

          “Where has the Governor been in the last few weeks as Metro hospitals are at 98% ICU capacity?”

          If he did anything you’d criticism him for that. And apparently you don’t think it’s a big enough deal to use emergency powers. Which side of your mouth will your next inane comment come from?

      3. “It would never occur to them to try to use state government to help those very businesses.”

        Can you please elaborate as to how that would work or what that would look like?

        1. Well, for starters we could recognize that we are in fact ALL in this together. No matter how careful I am with social distancing, washing hands and wearing my mask, a few thousand people in “greater” Minnesotaare doing nothing to help us advance collectively to a better place. So for starters, wear a mask, you fool!

          Where has Walz been? Since March I have heard him pleading with people to be smart, follow the science, let’s not fill up our hospital beds. What if we had listened to the crazies who think mask-wearing is a “personal choice” and refuse to be “oppressed” by the guvment.

          My goodness, I am thankful every day that we still have people like Tim Walz and Jan Malcolm to remind me that I have not moved to Loony Land.

          1. Hi Tom, Thanks for your reply. Please note that I do not see the world in terms of team red or blue. I try to be interested in good ideas that promote prosperity, responsibility, and liberty for all.

            That said, do you have any more concrete or actionable ideas? Seems to me that the state leaders have been pretty inconsistent in their lockdowns. Case in point that the corporations were allowed to continue business a pretty much usual while small business was forced to shutter and then operate at 50% or less capacity. As I recall Menards mandated masks before the state.

            How can state government help businesses? I personally do not see loans (forgivable or otherwise) as the answer.

            Take Care!

            1. The governor has been consistent with his mask-wearing pleas. The Senate Republicans have not been nearly so vocal, and give a wink-wink to their constituents who don’t want to wear masks. Now “greater” MN is soaring in COVID cases. That brings us all down.
              What I would really like is for the Republicans to act like grownups and give the same sane healthy line Walz and Jan Malcolm do: mask up, social distance, cut out the socializing unless it’s at a distance, etc.
              My goodness, why does it matter if you are a Dem, Repub, or independent to state it simply? Mask up, social distance, help one another by inconveniencing yourself.

              1. In my travels- various areas around the metro and NE MN, I see mask compliance at 95% wherever I go. Tables space apart. Servers wearing PPE Yet the positivity rate is increasing. Hmmm. Maybe pieces of tee shirt are not really effective against a particle that averages 0.3 microns in size. You think? The science doesn’t work.
                I continue to wear one for the show.

                PS Waltz wants buy in. Include the GOP. Then maybe you’ll get some.
                I’m not impressed by somebody who never has had to ever worry about being laid off, fired, or downsized. Let’s lay him off in two years

      4. I echo Mr. Owens gratitude to Gov. Walt for his efforts to keep us safe and for his stamina and stoicism, despite the fact he may have endured Covid 19 himself. Raised and worked in the Twin Cities, including Minneapolis and still have younger relatives in Minneapolis. Only moved to Central Minnesota to be with a dying brother, an engineer, who ran a business partially involving removing asbestos and dangerous strains of mold from commercial and residential property. In regards to all the comments about people in Central Minnesota not wearing masks – that is not true of the majority. In regards to all the Trump signs, see it for what it really is. Not an endorsement of Trump but a rebuke and rejection of certain Minnesota DFL endorsed candidates, particularly one, along with others from different states, are encouraging their very young followers to expect everything free ( before) Covid 19 emerged. Health care providers and educators cannot
        be expected to work for free so this person’s very young
        followers can then get everything on their wish list free.
        Very, very, tired and disgusted with demagogues, from
        any political party. Many people here are elderly and
        realize if something is to good to be true, it probably
        isn’t and there really is no free lunch for adults, much as we all want that. Last post and last contact with MinnPost. Did however learn alot from the articles and the majority of the comments. Just tired of the stereotyping of people from this area or for that matter from any area.

  2. Republicans are very comfortable in being in the minority as long as they have enough strength to retain a veto power over state government. This helps to explain why they have disappeared from the cities, and are fading away in the suburbs. It’s why they no longer wage serious statewide campaigns.

  3. Really, from a DFL perspective, it’s a question of whether things get better at a faster pace than they get worse.

Leave a comment